Yeah dude you're overreacting pretty hard to a semi-joke vote on you. That seems pretty scummy to me so I'm going to have a drop a vote here.curiouskarmadog wrote:now that just hurts BM...Battle Mage wrote:Vote: CKD
bandwagon much?
I placed a second vote on Lazy...you place the second vote on me...you say I am bandwagoning...
I say you are (fill in the blank), the circle begins a new?
are we going to start bumping heads again?
Agreedwaar wrote:Yeah dude you're overreacting pretty hard to a semi-joke vote on you. That seems pretty scummy to me so I'm going to have a drop a vote here.curiouskarmadog wrote:now that just hurts BM...Battle Mage wrote:Vote: CKD
bandwagon much?
I placed a second vote on Lazy...you place the second vote on me...you say I am bandwagoning...
I say you are (fill in the blank), the circle begins a new?
are we going to start bumping heads again?
Vote: curiouskarmadog
ok I will bite,waar wrote:And now you're trying to downplay your scum slip from before by pretending it's nothing. Just keep digging your own grave buddy.curiouskarmadog wrote:lol, BM, see what you have caused?
Townies should be stoic and logical. Emotions are scummy.curiouskarmadog wrote:ok I will bite,waar wrote:And now you're trying to downplay your scum slip from before by pretending it's nothing. Just keep digging your own grave buddy.curiouskarmadog wrote:lol, BM, see what you have caused?
how did I over react, by asking questions?
I will even humor you further, if I did overreact, how does that =scum?
" because there's no way that you didn't notice waar and 50's votes directly above yours. Even if you missed Tar's, that would've put CKD at at least 3 votes with yours being the 4th which is, again, an awful lot to tack on to someone without even giving themselves a chance to explain what they meant or defend themselves against the accusations. I am not sure how one posts and answer to a question without anwsering a question...not to mention answering a question that wasnt even directed to you...but now I will direct it to you.50 pounds of bread wrote:Townies should be stoic and logical. Emotions are scummy.curiouskarmadog wrote:ok I will bite,waar wrote:And now you're trying to downplay your scum slip from before by pretending it's nothing. Just keep digging your own grave buddy.curiouskarmadog wrote:lol, BM, see what you have caused?
how did I over react, by asking questions?
I will even humor you further, if I did overreact, how does that =scum?
Just playing around.WomensRights wrote:I'm pretty sure that taking someone halfway to lynch on a dubious scumtell while not giving himself a chance to explain what's going on is far, far more scummy than CKD questioning the jokevote.
Serious vote!
##unvote: Alasdair
##vote: Lazy
You didn't even provide an explanation as to your vote. It looked like you just hopped on the first bandwagon picking up some steam. And I won't buy an excuse of "But I didn't know how many he had
Joking around or not bringing someone halfway to lynch is still quite scummy in my opinion. Also absolutely nothing in your post even hinted that you were joking about it because you didn't post anything at all.Lazy wrote: Just playing around.
We're hardly out of jokevoting and I've never done blatant bandwagoning yet, so now was a good time to try it out.
I fully expected to be called for it and now it happened.
Well, you're entitled to think so and that's probably what I'd do as well in your situation.WomensRights wrote:Joking around or not bringing someone halfway to lynch is still quite scummy in my opinion. Also absolutely nothing in your post even hinted that you were joking about it because you didn't post anything at all.Lazy wrote: Just playing around.
We're hardly out of jokevoting and I've never done blatant bandwagoning yet, so now was a good time to try it out.
I fully expected to be called for it and now it happened.
Are you seriously trying to make your only defense a WIFOM defense? Oh good lord. I wish I had two votes Mister.Lazy wrote: Well, you're entitled to think so and that's probably what I'd do as well in your situation.
However, I would know better than that if I were scum. It's ever so easy to hide in a game where lurkers are a plenty, so why would I choose to do something as risky and obvious as bandwagoning without a reason?
WIFOM and "too scummy to be scum", I know, but I WAS only fooling around, you know
A townie would react calm. Your reply to his jokevote gave me the impression that you were nervous about something. Nervousness is often-times a sign of guilt.curiouskarmadog wrote: I will even humor you further, if I did overreact, how does that =scum?
And this deserves an FoS for not recognizing a joke.Peers wrote:Unvote
Vote: Garnasha
It just seems wrong to take a statement made while signing up for the thread as a scumtell when roles hadn't been handed out yet.
Now why would you add that? This actually makes me think you were more serious about that FoS than I thought, because you feel the need to correct yourself.ChronX wrote: FoS Lurkers. LOL LOL LOL LOL JK JK
Fixed
Ahh, :colbert: means this is serious...WomensRights wrote:Are you seriously trying to make your only defense a WIFOM defense? Oh good lord. I wish I had two votes Mister.Lazy wrote: Well, you're entitled to think so and that's probably what I'd do as well in your situation.
However, I would know better than that if I were scum. It's ever so easy to hide in a game where lurkers are a plenty, so why would I choose to do something as risky and obvious as bandwagoning without a reason?
WIFOM and "too scummy to be scum", I know, but I WAS only fooling around, you know
