Realistic Mafia - Game Over

Crub · Post Post #1700 (ISO) » Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:50 pm

how do you know the setup so well to be able to define what's absurd?

armlx · Post Post #1701 (ISO) » Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:58 am

General knowledge of game balance.

SensFan · Post Post #1702 (ISO) » Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:12 am

Crub's insistence that it's a Nat/Sens scumpair is noted.

armlx · Post Post #1703 (ISO) » Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:25 am

Crub's insistence that it's a Nat/Sens scumpair is noted.

Especially while every other post is accusing me.

SensFan · Post Post #1704 (ISO) » Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:31 am

For the record, armlx, I don't consider you as confirmed.

NabakovNabakov · Post Post #1705 (ISO) » Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:36 am

No access until next wednesday (China)

armlx · Post Post #1706 (ISO) » Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:51 am

SensFan wrote:For the record, armlx, I don't consider you as confirmed.

I agree, but thats not my point. He's throwing suspicion on everyone he can is my point.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1707 (ISO) » Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:55 pm

I'm getting pretty tired of the people leaving for a whole week without notifying me first some time in front of it. I really hate it to replace anyone at this point, and I don't want this game to drag for some more weeks. I'm pushing the deadline a bit ahead, but that's final. If you haven't made up your mind by then, it's your own problem

Crub · Post Post #1708 (ISO) » Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:18 pm

SensFan wrote:Crub's insistence that it's a Nat/Sens scumpair is noted.

I'm not insisting anything, I'm saying it's something that should be considered as possible.

SensFan · Post Post #1709 (ISO) » Wed Jun 25, 2008 3:10 am

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]I'm getting pretty tired of the people leaving for a whole week without notifying me first some time in front of it. I really hate it to replace anyone at this point, and I don't want this game to drag for some more weeks. I'm pushing the deadline a bit ahead, but that's final. If you haven't made up your mind by then, it's your own problem[/quote]
Is now a bad time to mention I'm gone from Sunday-Wednesday?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1710 (ISO) » Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:11 am

No. It's fine. You'll have to next saturday anyway

armlx · Post Post #1711 (ISO) » Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:29 am

So, yeah. Still NLing?

SensFan · Post Post #1712 (ISO) » Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:07 am

I'd rather we wait until I get back from V/LA, personally. I want to be sure I'm here for night.

armlx · Post Post #1713 (ISO) » Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:22 am

I'd rather we wait until I get back from V/LA, personally. I want to be sure I'm here for night.

Sure. No reason to rush it. I just felt like something needed to be posted.

SensFan · Post Post #1714 (ISO) » Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:31 am

armlx wrote:
I'd rather we wait until I get back from V/LA, personally. I want to be sure I'm here for night.
Sure. No reason to rush it. I just felt like something needed to be posted.

Sounds good. Just wanted to make sure that NL wasn't voted, especially with Nat coming back soon.

armlx · Post Post #1715 (ISO) » Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:39 pm

Yeah, voting NL is pretty much a waste compared to just stalling out till deadline.

Natirasha · Post Post #1716 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 2:24 pm

Alright, I'm back(Your also lucky this game is rather slow).

Right now, I'm thinking either Crub, Armlx, or a Crub/armlx scumteam is the way to go.

I am actually ashamed of myself that I've let armlx slide as long as he has. I don't trust my investigations, and he really has nothing in any sense of anything to prove himself town. Heck, even Crub has the whole singing thing going on a bit. Plus, his recent posts unnerve me a bit.

Crub · Post Post #1717 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:47 pm

so I spend a night out in the open making as much noise as I canand that makes me more likely to be scum

SensFan · Post Post #1718 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:52 am

Crub wrote:so I spend a night out in the open making as much noise as I canand that makes me more likely to be scum

No, I think he was saying that your singing is worth about as much as an investigation on armlx...

armlx · Post Post #1719 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:28 am

Natirasha wrote:Alright, I'm back(Your also lucky this game is rather slow).

Right now, I'm thinking either Crub, Armlx, or a Crub/armlx scumteam is the way to go.

I am actually ashamed of myself that I've let armlx slide as long as he has. I don't trust my investigations, and he really has nothing in any sense of anything to prove himself town. Heck, even Crub has the whole singing thing going on a bit. Plus, his recent posts unnerve me a bit.

Nat, do you have any objections to a NL + try to get more info at night?

Natirasha · Post Post #1720 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:31 am

armlx wrote:
Natirasha wrote:Alright, I'm back(Your also lucky this game is rather slow).

Right now, I'm thinking either Crub, Armlx, or a Crub/armlx scumteam is the way to go.

I am actually ashamed of myself that I've let armlx slide as long as he has. I don't trust my investigations, and he really has nothing in any sense of anything to prove himself town. Heck, even Crub has the whole singing thing going on a bit. Plus, his recent posts unnerve me a bit.
Nat, do you have any objections to a NL + try to get more info at night?

No, although something is nagging me about, I'm not sure what, though...

armlx · Post Post #1721 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:32 am

My one concern would involve 2 deaths happening vs a 2 player scum group.

SensFan · Post Post #1722 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:44 pm

There's 6 alive, though.

SensFan · Post Post #1723 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:45 pm

Gah, what am I saying? 6 alive means 2 deaths is a loss if there's a 2-man scumgroup...

armlx · Post Post #1724 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:08 am

So..... anyone got any other thoughts/concerns/comments?