Generic uPick - Sentence fragments aside, the game is over.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:52 pm

ShadowLurker wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote:
ShadowLurker wrote:Is post 64 not setting off major red flags for anyone else?

Because you would never try to prevent a speed lynch, right?
He jumped off when the momentum for the wagon had completely derailed and said he might jump back on again later.

Scummy as hell, that is.

That's actually a valid point. I'm repeating it in the hopes that PokerFace will notice it between all the spam and respond to it.

Ether · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:52 pm

Votecount wrote:1 xyzzy (Flameaxe)
1 bird1111 (Yosarian2)
1 PokerFace (ShadowLurker)
1 ShadowLurker (xyzzy)
1 Yosarian2 (bird1111)

1 Unvote (PokerFace)

6 alive; 4 to lynch.

xyzzy · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:52 pm

Flameaxe wrote:
bird1111 wrote:The same behavior which I have been exhibiting all day regardless of allignment? Yes.
Fragment. Consider revising.

He misspelled alignment in addition to the fragment.

Flameaxe · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:53 pm

xyzzy wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
bird1111 wrote:The same behavior which I have been exhibiting all day regardless of allignment? Yes.
Fragment. Consider revising.
He misspelled alignment in addition to the fragment.

Sorry, the poor grammar clouded that from me.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:54 pm

Flameaxe wrote:
bird1111 wrote:The same behavior which I have been exhibiting all day regardless of allignment? Yes.
Fragment. Consider revising.

Are you that annoying micosoft paperclip guy, by any chance?

ShadowLurker · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:54 pm

Clippy is my friend. <3

PokerFace · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:54 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:
ShadowLurker wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote:
ShadowLurker wrote:Is post 64 not setting off major red flags for anyone else?

Because you would never try to prevent a speed lynch, right?
He jumped off when the momentum for the wagon had completely derailed and said he might jump back on again later.

Scummy as hell, that is.
That's actually a valid point. I'm repeating it in the hopes that PokerFace will notice it between all the spam and respond to it.

I gave my answer earlier. Use the bottom of the page thingy so you only have to view my posts and thus avoid the spam. the simul posting made me think that wagon be going to fast possibly.

xyzzy · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:54 pm

Flameaxe wrote:
xyzzy wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
xyzzy wrote:
ShadowLurker wrote:Is post 64 not setting off major red flags for anyone else?
no not really

JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
No, not really.*
While it is correct that I was being gramatically incorrect, I was using incorrectness in a manner intended to convey irony. Surely actual literary techniques surpass grammar, BBM?
Nothing is better than grammar. Grammar is god.

Are you implying that non-sequitors that use correct grammar are more historically relevant* than a speech by our President?

*Relevant not necessarily meaning useful in this usage.

bird1111 · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:55 pm

He's acting like it at least.

Flameaxe · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:55 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
bird1111 wrote:The same behavior which I have been exhibiting all day regardless of allignment? Yes.
Fragment. Consider revising.
Are you that annoying micosoft paperclip guy, by any chance?

No.

xyzzy · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:55 pm

Flameaxe wrote:
xyzzy wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
bird1111 wrote:The same behavior which I have been exhibiting all day regardless of allignment? Yes.
Fragment. Consider revising.
He misspelled alignment in addition to the fragment.
Sorry, the poor grammar clouded that from me.

It's alright. Poor grammar is traumatic.

xyzzy · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:55 pm

I suggest a massclaim.

ShadowLurker · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:55 pm

bird1111 wrote:He's acting like it at least.

What is this referring to?

Yosarian2 · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:56 pm

PokerFace wrote: I gave my answer earlier.

Yeah, I know, you simulposted it with my question.

Anyway, brb, laundry

Flameaxe · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:56 pm

PokerFace wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote:
ShadowLurker wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote:
ShadowLurker wrote:Is post 64 not setting off major red flags for anyone else?

Because you would never try to prevent a speed lynch, right?
He jumped off when the momentum for the wagon had completely derailed and said he might jump back on again later.

Scummy as hell, that is.
That's actually a valid point. I'm repeating it in the hopes that PokerFace will notice it between all the spam and respond to it.
I gave my answer earlier. Use the bottom of the page thingy so you only have to view my posts and thus avoid the spam. the simul posting made me think that wagon be going to fast possibly.

What is a "thingy"?

You need to add commas in your second sentence and capitalize the first word in the third, by the way.

bird1111 · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:56 pm

ShadowLurker wrote:
bird1111 wrote:He's acting like it at least.
What is this referring to?

Yosarian2 wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
bird1111 wrote:The same behavior which I have been exhibiting all day regardless of allignment? Yes.
Fragment. Consider revising.
Are you that annoying micosoft paperclip guy, by any chance?

This.

Flameaxe · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:57 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:
PokerFace wrote: I gave my answer earlier.
Yeah, I know, you simulposted it with my question.

Anyway, brb, laundry

Anyway, be right back. I need to do laundry. *corrected*

PokerFace · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:57 pm

ha ha flame

xyzzy · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:57 pm

You need to add commas in your second sentence and capitalize the first word in the third, by the way.

QFT

xyzzy · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:58 pm

PokerFace wrote:ha ha flame

I find it humorous that you mocked his lack of correct grammar! (corrected)

Flameaxe · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:59 pm

PokerFace wrote:ha ha flame

Ha ha Flameaxe.

xyzzy · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:00 pm

I feel my correction better represented the true nature of his sentence, considering the double meaning for "flame".

ShadowLurker · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:00 pm

Now we have two grammar nazis?

xyzzy · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:01 pm

vote: jathan

Let's massclaim.

JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08
JATH WAGON '08

Yosarian2 · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:01 pm

Is this a post restriction, Flameaxe? Because if it is, we might need to lynch you off in order to make you stop doing it. If it's not, we might need to lynch you off because you are being annyoing.