Pick your Poison 3 (Game Over)

[Patrick]

Votecount

2 shot vig (4) -- q21, Coron, Marmalade, Ether
Encryptor (5) -- JDodge, ashmite84, Incognito, Dave, babygirl86

18 alive, 10 to choose.

[Flameaxe]

Vote: Encryptor

[starkmoon]

vote encryptor

I missed a lot of the start of day... sorry guys. Been lying in bed convinced I am dying.

[armlx]

Why the hell are we giving the mafia a vig. The encryptor shouldn't screw us up unless we let it, the vig is a fricking blow out. The 1 mislynch = 2 vig shots doesnt take into account us not being dumb and the fact the night phase lets our roles work too.

Vote Encryptor

[q21]

Alright I am convinved.

Unvote: vig; Vote: Encryptor

I guess that lack of rolecop almost cuts the encryptor's powers in half.

[Mellowed Man]

vote: encryptor

[JDodge]

That should be 10. And I already know where my D1 vote is going. Hooray!

[q21]

Should be. Do is there a night now, or do we go straight into day 1 or what?

[q21]

Don't ask me what the "Do in the second sentence is for... I don't know.

[Patrick]

Final Votecount

2 shot vig (3) -- Coron, Marmalade, Ether
Encryptor (10) -- JDodge, ashmite84, Incognito, Dave, babygirl86, Flameaxe, Starkmoon, armlx, q21, Mellowed Man

18 alive, 10 to choose.

Godfather, 3 shot roleblocker and Encryptor have been given to the mafia. The mafia have up to 48 hours to talk amongst themselves and choose who gets what ability and who remains a goon. I'll call this night 0, even though no nightactions are taking place.

[Patrick]

The mafia have chosen their hierarchy, so the terms of the battle ahead have been completely decided. It's time to get to lynching.

Day 1. With 18 players alive, it's 10 votes to lynch. Deadline is May the 13th. Go and beat the other team.

[Coron]

Vote: StarkMoon

[Ether]

Vote: Incognito

, of course.

Q21, why the change of heart?

[q21]

Vote: Incognito

, of course.

Q21, why the change of heart?

People's comments along the way had made me start to question whether I was right to be worried about the Encryptor. I finally got a chance to read some of PYP 2, including the post game talk. The scum in that game admitted that the daytalk had hurt them. While that didn't prove to me that daytalk will always hurt the scum it did change my view to: Daytalk is as likely to hurt he scum as help them. A vig will always help he scum, so I changed my vote.

[Sarcastro]

Vote: Incognito

Bandwagon ahoy!

If you give us a list of your scumbuddies now, we'll consider letting you live. We already know that Mr. Incrediball is one, but you could still save us a lot of time by telling us who the other two are.

[scotmany12]

Vote: q21

[q21]

In my defence:... bite me...

[Sarcastro]

You know what would help your case, q21? Helping get Incogniscum lynched.

[q21]

Thing is, from his grand total of three posts I'm not sure why some of you seem to think he's evil. IS it because of his apparent nonchalance about which roles the scum get?

[Sarcastro]

First of all, there's his scummy, useless statement that it doesn't matter what powers the scum have. Not only is this statement totally incorrect, it also seems like a lame justification for 1) voting for the rolecop, and 2) not actually contributing any reasons for voting the way he did. His throw-in mention that the vig was somehow an exception to this statement (why, exactly?) looks like an attempt to seem like he actually is contributing something.

And then there's his second post, which is a hilariously bad attempt at excusing any "OMGUS" by claiming (ludicrously) that he's for some reason especially likely to be targetted by scum. Uh, yeah, sure.

[q21]

Okay, the inconsistency in his first post makes this a decent bandwagon.

Vote: Incognito

[Incognito]

First of all, there's his scummy, useless statement that it doesn't matter what powers the scum have. Not only is this statement totally incorrect, it also seems like a lame justification for 1) voting for the rolecop, and 2) not actually contributing any reasons for voting the way he did. His throw-in mention that the vig was somehow an exception to this statement (why, exactly?) looks like an attempt to seem like he actually is contributing something.

I stand by my statement. It really

doesn't

matter what power roles the scum have as long as the town does a good job of scum hunting and remaining active within the game. The exception to that (as I mentioned in my first post) is the two-shot vigilante. Reasoning: The two-shot vig allows for the scum to take down more members of the town in a shorter period of time.

You've used vague terms to describe my first post like "scummy", "useless", and "incorrect" but failed to provide reasoning as to why it's scummy, useless, and incorrect. I'm assuming that's coming soon?

And then there's his second post, which is a hilariously bad attempt at excusing any "OMGUS" by claiming (ludicrously) that he's for some reason especially likely to be targetted by scum. Uh, yeah, sure.

Meta-game me and look for instances where I've been accused of being scum while I was aligned on the side of the town. You'll see that a pretty good majority of those times the scum themselves were doing the accusing.

Okay, the inconsistency in his first post makes this a decent bandwagon.

Good luck with that. You're a moron for following along with a bandwagon and argument that has no actual substance.

Vote: Coron

Obvscum trying too hard to push for the acquisition of a two-shot vig.

[Coron]

Vote: Coron

Obvscum trying too hard to push for the acquisition of a two-shot vig.

[Elmo]

omgus is fun kids

[Sarcastro]

I stand by my statement. It really

doesn't

matter what power roles the scum have as long as the town does a good job of scum hunting and remaining active within the game. The exception to that (as I mentioned in my first post) is the two-shot vigilante. Reasoning: The two-shot vig allows for the scum to take down more members of the town in a shorter period of time.

No, Incognito, that doesn't explain your ridiculous assertion. Obviously the power roles

do

matter. Our power roles give us an advantage, and to say "Oh, it doesn't matter if the scum interfere with them, because we can win without them" is utterly ridiculous. I can only assume that that's your logic, by the way, because your "reasoning" doesn't explain anything except that *gasp* the vig is bad. Why don't you first explain why you don't think the scum having a daycop decreases our chances of winning the game?

You've used vague terms to describe my first post like "scummy", "useless", and "incorrect" but failed to provide reasoning as to why it's scummy, useless, and incorrect. I'm assuming that's coming soon?

"Useless" and "incorrect" are vague? How, exactly? "Useless" means that is without use. It does not contribute anything. It is unhelpful. I thought I made this rather clear. "Incorrect" means it is not correct. How is that vague? "Scummy" is indeed vague on its own, but I didn't just declare your post scummy with no explanation, did I?

Meta-game me and look for instances where I've been accused of being scum while I was aligned on the side of the town. You'll see that a pretty good majority of those times the scum themselves were doing the accusing.

I don't really care if scum happened to try to get you lynched once. Can you show me a meaningful trend of scum targetting you more than usual? Are you certain that this amazing claim (scum, numerically fewer, are more likely to find you scummy than town) is actually true? Can you postulate some reason why this might be so? Why do the scum single you out so? Why would I know to target you?

Stop trying to justify bullshit OMGUS.