Mini 617 - Scottish Mafia, Game Over

q21 · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:44 am

dcorbe.... its page one. Everything I have said so far is a joke... though it does seem to be making you unnaturally touchy.

q21 · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:45 am

EBWOP: well it was page one until then...

dcorbe · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:11 am

fair enough.

Cybele · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:57 am

Kekekeke! THe game's finally started!

Hmmmm...

vote dcorbe

Spread the love!

starkmoon · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:15 am

[col color=white]Player[col color=white]Votes[col color=white]Voting [col color=white]roflcopter[col color=white]2[col color=white]CC09, Lowell [col color=white]CC09[col color=white]1[col color=white]q21 [col color=white]massive[col color=white]1[col color=white]cephrir [col color=white]Erratus Apathos[col color=white]1[col color=white]dRool89 [col color=white]Lowell[col color=white]1[col color=white]rolfcopter [col color=white]q21[col color=white]1[col color=white]kuribo [col color=white]dcorbe[col color=white]1[col color=white]cybele

[col color=white]Not Voting : [col color=white] dcorbe, Empking, Erratus Apathos, massive

CoheedCambria09 · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:24 am

Mod: Keep the votes in the format your using, its very nice

Empking · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:16 am

Vote: Erratus Apathos

If dcorbe is right then you gave a lieing reason for your vote.

Erratus Apathos · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:52 am

Erratus Apathos wrote:
Vote: dRool89

avatarless = SCUM

Since this didn't count for some reason, let me try again.

Vote: dRool89

avatarless = SCUM

q21 wrote:
Erratus Apathos wrote:
Vote: dRool89

avatarless = SCUM
How do you know he's avatar less? He hasn't even posted in thread yet. You sir are bussing your scum buddy. :lol:

I know he's avatarless thanks to psychoanalytical Internet technomagic the likes of which nobody here would ever comprehend. Also there's no avatar on his post in the signup queue.

Empking wrote:
Erratus Apathos

If that was your reason surely you'd at least FOS everyone else without an avatar.

Holy bejesus, there's two people without an avatar? If I was the third guy on your team I'd be really pissed at the both of you for giving away yourselves this early.

Lowell · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:05 am

unvote, vote coheed

ISO · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:26 am

Unvote, Vote roflcopter

Empking · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:49 am

Unvote Vote: Lowell

kuribo · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:04 am

What's with all the voting without any other text?

Empking · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:23 am

Aw you ruined it.

dcorbe · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:58 am

Erratus Apathos wrote: Holy bejesus, there's two people without an avatar? If I was the third guy on your team I'd be really pissed at the both of you for giving away yourselves this early.

The votes right now are pretty much random, but this this sounds like you're breadcrumming about your involvement with others.

Unvote Vote: Erratus Apathos

massive · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:49 am

I'm not sure I get how Erratus's post could be construed as "breadcrumming" (sic) ... mind explaining that one?

And I also think we can probably move past the "random voting" since we're on page three.

dcorbe · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:54 am

massive wrote:I'm not sure I get how Erratus's post could be construed as "breadcrumming" (sic) ... mind explaining that one?

I'm just trying to get a pressure wagon going on someone so we can do as you suggested below, rather than simply saying "we should move past the random voting stage now" and doing nothing about it. You've basically just ensured that no wagon will form.

And I also think we can probably move past the "random voting" since we're on page three.

FoS: Massive

for being anti-scumhunting

dcorbe · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:56 am

EBWOP because my quote tags came out messed up

massive wrote:I'm not sure I get how Erratus's post could be construed as "breadcrumming" (sic) ... mind explaining that one?

I'm just trying to get a pressure wagon going on someone so we can do as you suggested below, rather than simply saying "we should move past the random voting stage now" and doing nothing about it. You've basically just ensured that no wagon will form.

massive wrote:And I also think we can probably move past the "random voting" since we're on page three.

FoS: Massive

for being anti-scumhunting

Empking · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:04 am

Massive, you can't just change the number of posts per page and then expect us to follow your PPP.

ISO · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:11 am

FoWhatIsWrongWithYou: dcorbe

because I think it's pretty obvious that EA is not breadcrumbing, and exiting the random voting stage is not anti-scumhunting. Your posts are really weird and you take everything seriously, what's with that?

kuribo · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:15 am

dcorbe wrote: I'm just trying to get a pressure wagon going on someone so we can do as you suggested below, rather than simply saying "we should move past the random voting stage now" and doing nothing about it. You've basically just ensured that no wagon will form.

And you've just removed all pressure by stating that it's only for pressure.

TMYK.

kuribo · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:16 am

Erratus Apathos wrote: Holy bejesus, there's two people without an avatar? If I was the third guy on your team I'd be really pissed at the both of you for giving away yourselves this early.

How do you know how many players is on a team?

dcorbe · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:41 am

kuribo wrote:
Erratus Apathos wrote: Holy bejesus, there's two people without an avatar? If I was the third guy on your team I'd be really pissed at the both of you for giving away yourselves this early.
How do you know how many players is on a team?

Hi guys!! That's what I meant by breadcrumming! THANKS!

Cephrir wrote: FoWhatIsWrongWithYou: dcorbe because I think it's pretty obvious that EA is not breadcrumbing, and exiting the random voting stage is not anti-scumhunting. Your posts are really weird and you take everything seriously, what's with that?

What's wrong with taking anything seriously? You can take something seriously and still have fun with it. I'd be concerned about anyone who is able to coast through a game without making a serious attempt at scum hunting. It's in the town's best interests to take a few things seriously and it's in the scum's best interests not to.

kuribo wrote:And you've just removed all pressure by stating that it's only for pressure.

QFT and to state the obvious that you guys need to stop jumping on people for early votes. Most early D1 wagons fall apart anyways. It's time to start trying to turn up the pressure a bit here.

Lowell · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:58 am

kuribo wrote:
Erratus Apathos wrote: Holy bejesus, there's two people without an avatar? If I was the third guy on your team I'd be really pissed at the both of you for giving away yourselves this early.
How do you know how many players is on a team?

I'm also curious.

unvote, vote erratus

Erratus Apathos · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:13 am

massive wrote:I'm not sure I get how Erratus's post could be construed as "breadcrumming" (sic) ... mind explaining that one?

And I also think we can probably move past the "random voting" since we're on page three.

I agree, we should get away from random voting.

Unvote, Vote: Massive

for suggesting we get away from random voting while doing nothing to further that end. How's that for a nonrandom vote?

kuribo wrote:
Erratus Apathos wrote: Holy bejesus, there's two people without an avatar? If I was the third guy on your team I'd be really pissed at the both of you for giving away yourselves this early.
How do you know how many players is on a team?

Mini normals almost always have three mafia.

kuribo · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:15 am

Erratus Apathos wrote: How do you know how many players is on a team?

Mini normals almost always have three mafia.[/quote]

Not buying it. Everytime I've seen scum slip how many mafia there are, they tried to explain it in a way like you did. (And when they were lynched, they were still scum)