is vengeful
a normal role?
is vengeful
won't the timer tell us if we have a vengeful?In post 15, Andresvmb wrote:It is. Not sure how that relates to the part of the rules you quoted, but I very much believe so.
but isn't it not actually elo if there's a vengefulIn post 17, Andresvmb wrote:It shouldn’t, no.In post 16, angela wrote:won't the timer tell us if we have a vengeful?In post 15, Andresvmb wrote:It is. Not sure how that relates to the part of the rules you quoted, but I very much believe so.
hello friend +)In post 19, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:hi angela!!!!
i am town! isis is jealous of how often i roll town
In post 25, Andresvmb wrote:angela I’m not going to lie - I find your concern for disclosure around a Vengeful role Scummy. The impact from there being a Vengeful role in the game is that the Scum can’t be certain that a coordinated hammer would end the game in what’s presumed to be ELo. Other than that, there’s no true downside for Town unless the Vengeful Town, if it exists, shoots incorrectly prior to Endgame. At Endgame, there isn’t much of a downside to shooting incorrectly since the game would’ve been lost if their role didn’t exist.
it is something that interested me about the rules and i wanted to see if you'd engage with it because you had just mentioned the rules and i found it unlikely enough for it to actually be the case here to feel there was any risk to discussIn post 27, Andresvmb wrote:Having said that, I suspect you would have asked your Scum buddies these questions outside of this thread, so perhaps too brazen for Scum. I just don’t think this conversation is helpful for the Town.
In post 67, Nero Cain wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
i mean,In post 69, Save The Dragons wrote:this game is hoppin
could you maybe put to words why?In post 71, Scorpious wrote:just to clarify,This is the question I would like answered. Not GalronIn post 42, Scorpious wrote:Is that including this game?In post 28, Andresvmb wrote:I have rolled Town 96.2% of the time on this forum. Unbeatable.
or what this game being included vs this game not being included would mean in terms of alignment and so forthIn post 73, angela wrote:like what can be gained from this/have you checked the math yourself/would it mean anything if it was untruthful
though i guess it is also possible that nero's zzzzzzzzzzzzz was implying boredom with being voted for what seemed to be a tongue in cheek music comment and i misinterpreted it at firstIn post 72, angela wrote:In post 67, Nero Cain wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzi mean,In post 69, Save The Dragons wrote:this game is hoppin
it's not like either of you have adopted a particularly proactive sorting role here?
which would kinda be the expected next step from
'hm, the game seems to be moving slower than i'd prefer,'
yeah?
like at least nero cain has shared some thoughts on the game
guess i don't really understand the purpose of 'this game is hoppin' then
hmIn post 79, Scorpious wrote:because I was going to lead into my analogy of Roulette at a casino. They tell you what numbers have fallen and people use that to "predict" what numbers will come next.
But probability states that the past rolls have zero bearing on the next one, meaning you could be town in 99% of your games up to thins one, but that means nothing this time around.
Does that help?
i guess it doesn't really seem like andres was trying to sayIn post 80, angela wrote:hmIn post 79, Scorpious wrote:because I was going to lead into my analogy of Roulette at a casino. They tell you what numbers have fallen and people use that to "predict" what numbers will come next.
But probability states that the past rolls have zero bearing on the next one, meaning you could be town in 99% of your games up to thins one, but that means nothing this time around.
Does that help?
taking the long road to gambler's fallacy i see
hmIn post 87, Scorpious wrote:I found it weird that post 25 and post 27 were so pointed..In post 86, MalcolmTucker wrote:In post 25, Andresvmb wrote:angela I’m not going to lie - I find your concern for disclosure around a Vengeful role Scummy. The impact from there being a Vengeful role in the game is that the Scum can’t be certain that a coordinated hammer would end the game in what’s presumed to be ELo. Other than that, there’s no true downside for Town unless the Vengeful Town, if it exists, shoots incorrectly prior to Endgame. At Endgame, there isn’t much of a downside to shooting incorrectly since the game would’ve been lost if their role didn’t exist.Dunno about anyone else but got a bit of a weird vibe from these two posts in sequence. Andre goes in on Angela potentially being mafia, but then very much appears to walk it back almost immediately afterwards as if wary they've perhaps gone in too heavily for such an early point in the game.In post 27, Andresvmb wrote:Having said that, I suspect you would have asked your Scum buddies these questions outside of this thread, so perhaps too brazen for Scum. I just don’t think this conversation is helpful for the Town.
I don’t even know if everyone had popped in yet..
do youIn post 114, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm town though
i have played with not mafia before (and you!) i just feel likeIn post 117, Nero Cain wrote:angela, NM isn't going to do anything regardless of alignment.
i mean, at the very least it is really icky for shoshin to be doing so if trueIn post 125, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:is it really icky if its true
okay but where was anyone saying that the coin had a memory?In post 132, KittyTacky wrote:Exactly. It's the Gambler's Fallacy. While flipping a coin and it landing on heads 100 times in a row is very unlikely, the coin has no memory and each flip has a 50/50 chance of being heads.In post 79, Scorpious wrote:because I was going to lead into my analogy of Roulette at a casino. They tell you what numbers have fallen and people use that to "predict" what numbers will come next.In post 73, angela wrote:could you maybe put to words why?
like what can be gained from this/have you checked the math yourself/would it mean anything if it was untruthful
can wait until andres responds i guess if you'd like
but i don't really get it
But probability states that the past rolls have zero bearing on the next one, meaning you could be town in 99% of your games up to thins one, but that means nothing this time around.
Does that help?
hmIn post 141, Morning Tweet wrote:I don't like how X-1 is removed from the game
…In post 157, Not_Mafia wrote:No people are far too cautious about building wagons, it's why I quickhammer
also your doing so only really encourages the mafias to be less cautious (though they’d have to be sneaky about this) and towns to be more cautious in generalIn post 157, Not_Mafia wrote:No people are far too cautious about building wagons, it's why I quickhammer
i mean, trying to apply a fallacy to a post that doesn’t seem present in said post feels like assigning to meIn post 163, Scorpious wrote:incorrect. I am not assigning anything. Please don't associate a concept(oushing a narrative) that I am not doing with me. You asked me to clarify a question and then I answered. I was just trying to make a point.In post 155, angela wrote:like now both of you are assigning a narrative to a post that is kinda hard for me to see
What's concerning to me is that you have made N_M's existence in this game the focal point ofyournarrative.
Most of us already know what to expect, and in they're own way it does look like they are trying moreso than usual.
What they do sets them up to be perfectly hidden scum in any way and I think that,s the point. comes of as a person that just enjoys ending people's experience, for better or for worse.
"Well N_M hammered"
"N_M always hammers"
This is the last I'll really comment on it unless prompted, but N_M's existence in this game should not be being analyzed so deeply.
quoting this so i don’t forget it happenedIn post 149, Scorpious wrote:Are you going to give us some insight into these “thoughts”?In post 77, Save The Dragons wrote:actually i think you and kittytacky are town so i guess i have thoughts
sorry for quoting everything; phoneIn post 167, Scorpious wrote:? i asked not mafia two questions then clarified that i was familiar with not mafia and that the not mafia elimination others were suggesting seemed eh to me at this time; how is that the focal point of my narrative?In post 115, angela wrote:do youIn post 114, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm town though
think it is noteworthy that pooky would suggest policying you now?
/
do you
think anything noteworthy has happened so far?In post 118, angela wrote:i have played with not mafia before (and you!) i just feel likeIn post 117, Nero Cain wrote:angela, NM isn't going to do anything regardless of alignment.
like like like
not mafia's not doing anything is often compounded by no one expecting not mafia to do anything
or encouraging not mafia or engaging not mafia
like if i were clever maybe i could have thought of a good response to not mafia's request to be bought dinner first
that maybe not mafia would have thought was clever enough to answer the question
and maybe that answer possibly would have been alignment relevant
but i couldn't think of anything that even i thought might be funny let alone something i would expect someone else to think was funnyIn post 121, angela wrote:ehhhhhhhh
pretty opposed to policying not mafia for being not mafia
and the shoshin thing is in super super icky territoryIn post 158, angela wrote:…In post 157, Not_Mafia wrote:No people are far too cautious about building wagons, it's why I quickhammer
it’s just like
less likely to hit mafias
and!
gives mafia opportunities
and!
ends the dayIn post 159, angela wrote:also your doing so only really encourages the mafias to be less cautious (though they’d have to be sneaky about this) and towns to be more cautious in generalIn post 157, Not_Mafia wrote:No people are far too cautious about building wagons, it's why I quickhammer
though i have seen enough towns try to use you as a pseudo double vote in certain situations to know that not everyone views this the way i do
Perhaps it's not entirely your focal point, but it 's been a good portion of your content so far. I'm not pushing it as AI at this point, just merely pointing it out,and responding to you telling me I'm doing the same.
i am not twisting words though?In post 169, Scorpious wrote:whoa you are pretty good a twisting words,so we'll use lessIn post 168, angela wrote:sorry for quoting everything; phone
i don’t understand why you think these are comparable things?
like it felt to me like you’re saying andresvmb was possibly doing something and i don’t really see that something at all, which isn’t similar to my interactions with/about not mafia at all?
it’s also strange to me that you say you are opposed to not mafia policy elimination, which is what half-ish of my posts about not mafia were about, but you also are opposed to me talking about not mafia?
like
…
?
-I asked Andres a simple question,then decided to respond to you instead of waiting for them. I'm impatient.
-I am against a N_M Policy LIM(sorry)
-You keep saying you "are not seeing" what I'm saying they are foing,I'm not I just asked 1 single question . There is nothing to see,move along,making a mountain out of a molehill here..
my previously stated opposition to the not mafia policy elimination, which you also quotedIn post 121, angela wrote:ehhhhhhhh
pretty opposed to policying not mafia for being not mafia
and the shoshin thing is in super super icky territory
it is always possible that i am being unfair in interactions -In post 173, Scorpious wrote:I also stated previously That I'm not really used to there being so much taken out of what used to be an RVS.. This an adjustment for me.
I've been playing mafia for years and this is like the {REDACTED} game I've played with this pseudo RVS..
me too! and i am a mess regardless of level of distraction so if you feel issue is in communication please sayIn post 175, Scorpious wrote:I just feel content revolving around a PE and N_M specifically can be easily manufactured..
I'm just not articulating what I'm trying to say correctly, I'm also half distracted at work..
or even if you think i am having a similar issue in interaction with someone elseIn post 177, angela wrote:me too! and i am a mess regardless of level of distraction so if you feel issue is in communication please sayIn post 175, Scorpious wrote:I just feel content revolving around a PE and N_M specifically can be easily manufactured..
I'm just not articulating what I'm trying to say correctly, I'm also half distracted at work..
angela! please stop for a second!! i think we are misunderstanding eachother!!!
or something along those lines
i think morning tweet was referring to 185In post 222, Galron wrote:I"m not seeing what you're referring to.In post 206, Morning Tweet wrote:I do not get Galron's line of questioning to gera in 151
hm, but would you expect there to be in that conversation?In post 186, Galron wrote:but there isn't much by way of specific reads
kinda think both of these votes were pretty okay
mmm need to look at this closer in general tomorrowIn post 186, Galron wrote:They both sound earnest, I'll give you that, but there isn't much by way of specific reads. Although I guess I"m the one who started the Not_Mafia policy discussion, or at least contributed to it, and that kind of led into their conversation. But even with that, it could be an opportunity for two mafia to have a back and forth.
In post 180, KittyTacky wrote:This entire exchange is bizarre but I'm fairly sure angela and Scorpious are not both scum at least. Smells slightly of TvT.
i know a lot of people have already commented on this butIn post 184, KittyTacky wrote:It's a gut read. Not a strong one but it reads more like a town misunderstanding than mafia trying to discredit someone. And in any case it's very hard to see it as SvS.
hm
for me more than anything else if you will pretty pleaseIn post 229, angela wrote:203-206
feels kinda hmmmmmmmmmmm
like save the dragons was literally moving vote from morning tweet to rathe there
but there seems to be like
none of the expected resolution of the morning tweet vote from either side?
like it just seems to be forgotten due to rathe posts?
i didn't mean it as in 'i would have also made those votes'In post 234, Morning Tweet wrote:Whack
do youIn post 238, KittyTacky wrote:Like I really don't see why saying "this is likely TvT" is scummy.
more likely to come from scums*In post 240, angela wrote:like do any of them stand out to you specifically/what ways do they differ from the others that you think might be more likely to be scums?
(i would also be curious about your opinion of the save the dragons thing/why you didn't find save the dragons voting you/moving vote off of you noteworthy and such)In post 241, Morning Tweet wrote:
butIn post 249, Scorpious wrote:This is a moot point.
This is the last time I’m accepting N_M conversation as potential town content..
Anything beyond this will be considered scum filler by me. There is way to much discussion about a slot many of us know is kinda just there. Deal with it…
As I said. NOTHING they do is AI.. expect a quick hammer, maybe a quip or two(sometimes insightful) and a “mum” Joke here an there. that’s it …
No more N_M discussion please, unless it’s to vote.
like not mafia is generally considered to be a very good player by a lot of other very good playersIn post 257, angela wrote:but
how are you planning on sorting not mafia though?
are you just not? and you think that should be everyone's approach?
do you haveIn post 251, geraintm wrote:Kittytack is getting attention because they are one of the few players willing to try and explain their reasoning, and so just easy to keep pressure on them
VOTE: kitty
i have just heard a lot of different players i think are pretty good say this;In post 261, Not_Mafia wrote:And any mythos out there about me actually being a good player or having good reads is nonsense
i guess it is only a lot because total population of mafia players isn't all that manyIn post 262, angela wrote:i have just heard a lot of different players i think are pretty good say this;
do you have much experience with geraintm?In post 256, Nero Cain wrote:oh look gera is joining another bandwagon. nothing suspicious about that.
also interested in anyone else with experience with geraintm weighing in on thisIn post 264, angela wrote:do you have much experience with geraintm?In post 256, Nero Cain wrote:oh look gera is joining another bandwagon. nothing suspicious about that.
and if so,
would you say that town!geraintm generally functions under a blanket
"wagons are good"
playstyle?
like i might have time to look at some games myself later on in day but can't really right nowIn post 265, angela wrote:also interested in anyone else with experience with geraintm weighing in on this
who/whatIn post 260, Not_Mafia wrote:Why am I still being discussed?