The Pope’s Tiara wrote: I wasn't trying to say that at all. I know that it's hard to detect sarcasm when typed (sometimes) and that my posts weren't written by an idiot, just by someone who tends to quick scribble stuff down without thinking.
Even if we accept that you started out in the random vote stage being funny it was your own questions that led me and others to view that stage was ending, and that we should take each post more carefully and seriously. Sure you can still have fun with posts but a self-vote isn’t funny. It gives the impression that you are possibly bluffing, which doesn’t help town, or possibly can’t take criticism, which could mean you go defensive and overly cautious.
Simenon wrote:TPT is town, by the way.
I just want a clarification, but your defense against the Pope is that he is your partner?
nureins wrote:It seems this random vote is exploding...I want to know your opinions in the 4 points I wrote before (feel free to say all of them are ridiculous, i almost think they are ) and in the following extra two
nureins wrote: 1. Ythill QUICK vote after saying he doesnt like random-joke votes...
2. pope INSISTING on you so much
3. tpt voting back to Ythill in an OMGUS way
4. They playing to vote each other to DISTANCE in a semi-random phase...
1. I think his vote was serious, not random. He based the vote off a question from Pope’s #41 post, which does stick out if you don’t connect the Jack Nicholson joke after it. Pope’s question was loaded even though he did not FoS or vote matin.
2. Until he voted for Ythill it could be interpreted that Pope was focusing his random vote time too much on one person, creating something out of nothing.
The Pope’s Tiara wrote: I already know what you are. Your secret is safe with me.
3. Well the Pope says he knows and he wouldn’t be joking would he?[/sarcasm] Of course, if he did have information it wouldn’t be pro-town to keep it to himself, but I took this line with a grain of salt.
The pope’s Tiara wrote: OMGUS: (What does this mean?)
4. I don’t see if this was answered but OMGUS is when you vote for someone simply because they voted for you. But nureins, how are they trying to ‘distance’ each other? This seems to bring in more attention.
nureins wrote: 5. Ectomancer thinks all is a joke but he doesnt understand that tpt might also be joking and casts on him a fourth vote, SUSPICIOUS?
6. I ask u this because you are the only not voting now, and u unvoted ectomancer, so i guess your answer to five is NO (mine is also no) but want to know how you perceive all this struggle...random voting is typically unvoted when u put ur vote on someone else , were u planning to do it ?
5. I thought it could be a bluff like ‘you really want to try and lynch someone this early and get a dead townie?’ or maybe he was over anxious in the random voting stage and now that serious votes are cast on him he isn’t handling the pressure well. Regardless of the reason, self-votes are bad news.
I hope the Pope settles down and unvotes himself or we’ll never be able to take him seriously.
6. It’s more my style to question first and get responses before voting. But,
FoS: Simenon
You defend the Pope but give no reasoning. You also vote for the person on Pope’s offensive but again do not provide the reasons for why he is wrong. You said Ythill “backed down” but didn’t change his vote? What Ythill said was that he’d “consider that response” which is something you have do or it will lead to tunnel vision.