yeah i do, i fact i think i've got oneIn post 46, Oblivion wrote:Not as disappointed as it is in all of you. Do you truly think this is an acceptable method to find scum? There are members here whose votes it understands. For whom it believes there is merit and a town mental model for approaching a wagon in this manner. It does not make it less disappointed in the very existence of this wagon.
With all that being said, this is not a Town Players Reply to this interaction after the unvote, it thinks. It lacks a proper mental model to be certain, but against the Generic townie model, it... the joking brush off into everything else which reads as Mafia 101 Pamphlet? It gives it bad feelings.In post 47, Thomith wrote:Trust me I'm disappointed in myself too lol.
Of course it would have been funny if this had actually gone through, but I got cold feet
With that being said, I do want to get some information out of Day 1 that a quick lim probably doesn't get us.
Naerys is probably right that there is a decent chance that the scum might have been hiding on the wagon as it was growing
In post 46, Oblivion wrote:Not as disappointed as it is in all of you. Do you truly think this is an acceptable method to find scum? There are members here whose votes it understands. For whom it believes there is merit and a town mental model for approaching a wagon in this manner. It does not make it less disappointed in the very existence of this wagon.
The useful info is the reactions of involved and uninvolved players to the wagon itself.In post 48, Oblivion wrote: It dislikes the very idea. There's no foundation to base the reaction off of, so there's no baseline to test against.
Serious claim BTWIn post 16, Hu Tao wrote: I claim VT
while a big part of this will not be exploitable yet, it will get better as we get flips, since this is very early, these will also be very pure / unfiltered reactionsIn post 48, Oblivion wrote:What material? A Poisoned Well Opening to the game? Town or Scum, what player reacts within normal ranges to almost dying before ever hitting the thread? Do you think yourself so enlightened in the ways of player mentality that you will be able to discern town confusion and outrage from the scum variant? It doesn't think anyone can, reliably, and rather thinks that most natural responses from a player in that slot will be traditionally seen as scummy.In post 45, davesaz wrote: note to self: read the 2nd page first
I don't think it's a bad thing to hit an E-1 like that, it will certainly provide good material.
It dislikes the very idea. There's no foundation to base the reaction off of, so there's no baseline to test against.
In post 53, Thomith wrote:In post 46, Oblivion wrote:Not as disappointed as it is in all of you. Do you truly think this is an acceptable method to find scum? There are members here whose votes it understands. For whom it believes there is merit and a town mental model for approaching a wagon in this manner. It does not make it less disappointed in the very existence of this wagon.
Whose votes do you think are more likely to be town motivated?
These ones, it thinks.
Noting that I have thoughts on this but will leave it alone so that Oblivion can answer.In post 53, Thomith wrote: Whose votes do you think are more likely to be town motivated?
Can you elaborate please?In post 57, Oblivion wrote:In post 53, Thomith wrote:In post 46, Oblivion wrote:Not as disappointed as it is in all of you. Do you truly think this is an acceptable method to find scum? There are members here whose votes it understands. For whom it believes there is merit and a town mental model for approaching a wagon in this manner. It does not make it less disappointed in the very existence of this wagon.
Whose votes do you think are more likely to be town motivated?These ones, it thinks.
Gunslinger it is!
I mean, a quick day 1 also gives our PRs extremely potent cover, but i totally get where you're coming fromIn post 47, Thomith wrote:Trust me I'm disappointed in myself too lol.
Of course it would have been funny if this had actually gone through, but I got cold feet
With that being said, I do want to get some information out of Day 1 that a quick lim probably doesn't get us.
Naerys is probably right that there is a decent chance that the scum might have been hiding on the wagon as it was growing
Because of what each vote meant. Gypyx votes to induce pressure and create content, Titus votes to validate that pressure after the second vote and make it realized and Penguin votes to solidify said pressure.In post 59, Thomith wrote:Can you elaborate please?In post 57, Oblivion wrote:In post 53, Thomith wrote:In post 46, Oblivion wrote:Not as disappointed as it is in all of you. Do you truly think this is an acceptable method to find scum? There are members here whose votes it understands. For whom it believes there is merit and a town mental model for approaching a wagon in this manner. It does not make it less disappointed in the very existence of this wagon.
Whose votes do you think are more likely to be town motivated?These ones, it thinks.
Most people voted without a reason, why are those votes more townie?
In contrast, I'm finding myself disliking this reaction.In post 42, KayJayQueue wrote: Is this real? lol Day 1 is silly
SureIn post 39, Thomith wrote:To be fair mathematically that is probably true. I know there is likely not enough to go on right now, but in a few (irl) days, I'd like to know who you think is most likely if that's okay?In post 31, Naerys wrote:i think atleast 1 scum is hiding there
I find it crazy that it was that close to an elimination. I have done the random vote at the very beginning before but I’m much more tentative to make a real vote initially until I get a better feeling so I can’t tell if the speed voting is just for fun or is something that I’ll get used to with more games. I don’t know how to read the people that jumped on. I can say I don’t think it was bad from the first vote or maybe the second but I don’t know what jumping on is usually indicative, alignment wise. Or how to tell the 3-7 votes apart.In post 66, Thomith wrote:In contrast, I'm finding myself disliking this reaction.In post 42, KayJayQueue wrote: Is this real? lol Day 1 is silly
VOTE: KayJayQueue
Do you have any opinions on the speed wagon? Any votes you find weirder than the others?
Not sure what you mean by based?In post 68, PenguinPower wrote: because i'm based
In post 72, davesaz wrote:Not sure what you mean by based?In post 68, PenguinPower wrote: because i'm based
In post 34, Gypyx wrote: Penguin is based
What do you think of Oblivions reaction to the wagon?In post 70, KayJayQueue wrote:I find it crazy that it was that close to an elimination. I have done the random vote at the very beginning before but I’m much more tentative to make a real vote initially until I get a better feeling so I can’t tell if the speed voting is just for fun or is something that I’ll get used to with more games. I don’t know how to read the people that jumped on. I can say I don’t think it was bad from the first vote or maybe the second but I don’t know what jumping on is usually indicative, alignment wise. Or how to tell the 3-7 votes apart.In post 66, Thomith wrote:In contrast, I'm finding myself disliking this reaction.In post 42, KayJayQueue wrote: Is this real? lol Day 1 is silly
VOTE: KayJayQueue
Do you have any opinions on the speed wagon? Any votes you find weirder than the others?
