Mini 663 - Mind Screw Mafia II - Over

[Wall-E]

It is a real vote. I don't really know what you mean by "serious."

[dahill1]

It is a real vote. I don't really know what you mean by "serious."

as in, not random.
do you really think two votes is bandwagoning?
also, do you think early Day 1 bandwagons are good/bad and why?

[Wall-E]

It is a real vote. I don't really know what you mean by "serious."

as in, not random.
do you really think two votes is bandwagoning?

Sure, why not.

also, do you think early Day 1 bandwagons are good/bad and why?

I think that day one voting is a bit random at best, but I've seen scum lynched day 1 enough to put some stock in the discussion part of the process. I prefer the lynch to occur as close to deadline as possible so the scummiest person possible is killed.

[dahill1]

It is a real vote. I don't really know what you mean by "serious."

as in, not random.
do you really think two votes is bandwagoning?

Sure, why not.[/quote[

X

I think that day one voting is a bit random at best, but I've seen scum lynched day 1 enough to put some stock in the discussion part of the process. I prefer the lynch to occur as close to deadline as possible so the scummiest person possible is killed.

i don't mean a Day 1 bandwagon that is necessarily carried out into a lynch, but just Day 1 bandwagons in general

[dahill1]

argh messed up the tags
real post:

It is a real vote. I don't really know what you mean by "serious."

as in, not random.
do you really think two votes is bandwagoning?

Sure, why not.

X

I think that day one voting is a bit random at best, but I've seen scum lynched day 1 enough to put some stock in the discussion part of the process. I prefer the lynch to occur as close to deadline as possible so the scummiest person possible is killed.

i don't mean a Day 1 bandwagon that is necessarily carried out into a lynch, but just Day 1 bandwagons in general

[Wall-E]

I still don't know what you mean. Do I think bandwagons on day one are a good idea? I'm going to say yes. Pressure is our sharpest tool.

[Wall-E]

It is a real vote. I don't really know what you mean by "serious."

as in, not random.
do you really think two votes is bandwagoning?

Sure, why not.

X

Next time make it multiple choice... I promise to do better.

[Wall-E]

Vote: Wall-E

I'm interested to see what this does.

What what does?

[dahill1]

Do I think bandwagons on day one are a good idea? I'm going to say yes. Pressure is our sharpest tool.

Vote: Cyberbob

for bandwagoneering.

unvote vote Wall-E

[Wall-E]

dahill1: Do you think a bandwagon with no reason behind it is a good idea?

[DrippingGoofball]

Major bus'ing going on here, I suspect.

[dahill1]

dahill1: Do you think a bandwagon with no reason behind it is a good idea?

first of all, this is (was?) the random voting stage, so when people make their first vote, they usually don't have an incredible amount of reasoning

second, 2 votes =/= a bandwagon

[Wall-E]

Vote: Cyberbob

for bandwagoneering.

I said "Bandwagoneering." I don't think it's a real word, so I'll define it:

"To add one's vote to another person's for the purpose of trying to start a bandwagon."

[dahill1]

Vote: Cyberbob

for bandwagoneering.

I said "Bandwagoneering." I don't think it's a real word, so I'll define it:

"To add one's vote to another person's for the purpose of trying to start a bandwagon."

vote still stands. you said bandwagons on day 1 are beneficial. yet you attack Cyberbob for trying to start one.

die hypocriticalscum die

[Wall-E]

I stand by it. It's as good as anything early day 1.

[iamausername]

Major bus'ing going on here, I suspect.

What makes you think that over the other possibilities?

[Wall-E]

I just realized the flaw with your logic, dahill1.

I voted for Cyberbob for starting a bandwagon with no stated reason. Translation: I approve of bandwagons so long as they have a stated reason.

I hope that is clearer. Now that you've strawman'd me and I've pointed out the flaw in your strawman I'll give you a chance to respond or retract your stance before I FoS you.

[Wall-E]

I just realized the flaw with your logic, dahill1.

I voted for Cyberbob for starting a bandwagon with no stated reason. Translation: I approve of bandwagons so long as they have a stated reason.

I hope that is clearer. Now that you've strawman'd me and I've pointed out the flaw in your strawman I'll give you a chance to respond or retract your stance before I FoS you.

[Wall-E]

hooray for macintosh

[Tarhalindur]

Point of Order!

"Cannot run out of time. There is infinite time. You are finite. Zathras is finite. This, is wrong tool... No, no, no. Not good. No, no... Never use this."

The Fourth Vote Count (aka the "Present Day. Present Time." Vote Count):

Vote Count:

iamausername (2) - Battousai, MafiaSSK
malthusis (0)
Jebus (0)
dahill1 (2) - Wall-E, Cyberbob
Cyberbob (0)
DrippingGoofball (0)
DragonsofSummer (0)
MafiaSSK (0)
Natirasha (2) - Natirasha, Jebus
Wall-E (3) - DragonsofSummer, malthusis, dahill1
Battousai (1) - iamausername

Not Voting (1): DrippingGoofball

Votes required to lynch: ???

FoS Count:

iamausername (0)
malthusis (0)
Jebus (0)
dahill1 (0)
Cyberbob (0)
DrippingGoofball (0)
DragonsofSummer (0)
MafiaSSK (0)
Natirasha (0)
Wall-E (1) - Jebus
Battousai (0)

Current Deadline:

???

End Point of Order!

[Battousai]

Unvote

Votes don't move this time. I'm on my laptop now, thus unreliable internet, so I'll have to make this post short.

[Jebus]

unvote
Vote: Tue Aug 26, 2008 4:36 pm

I'm confused now, but lets see where random experimenting can get mE.

[dahill1]

I just realized the flaw with your logic, dahill1.

I voted for Cyberbob for starting a bandwagon with no stated reason. Translation: I approve of bandwagons so long as they have a stated reason.

I hope that is clearer. Now that you've strawman'd me and I've pointed out the flaw in your strawman I'll give you a chance to respond or retract your stance before I FoS you.

please, no!!!! anything but FoSing me!!!!
my vote still stands, but i have to go so i'll explain more when i get the time to post

[malthusis]

Well, it looks like double posting or triple posting doesn't seem to cause a rule infraction. That theory gets thrown out the window.

Wall-E is acting very strangly with his votes, but seems to be not scummy. I'm thinking maybe he could be a Jester? (Side note: Does anyone notice Tar The Almighty Mod hasn't listed how many people we need to lynch? Be careful with your voting.)

Might as well experiment with random thoughts while I'm at it.

FoS Wall-E on Aug 27 at 11:11am

[Wall-E]

Can you define "strangely" at all?