[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13607808 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 2109: Taco Hemingway | Game Over - Mafiascum.net
AurorusVox wrote:
How is him not voting any worse than you voting to no vote?
Also don’t like the “it’s not E-2”, “oh it doesn’t matter it’s E-2”, seems slippery.
Honestly, I would've understood if this fuss was about me accidentally putting someone at E-1. But even in that case, on a D1, I wouldn't have withdrawn my vote, since the slot in question hasn't posted their thoughts yet.
You wouldn't have minded putting someone at E-1 at page 1 on day 1? You do realise that allows a scum to "accidentally" hammer?
Post
Post #38 (isolation #10) » Fri Jan 13, 2023 7:38 am
Postby Weuler »
In post 33, CCGeek wrote:
Also istg, if a genuine but stupid mistake leads me to becoming the lim for today, I'll literally riot... that is exactly what had happened my last town game asw.
The "not E-2" mistake was a genuine mistake. Not sure how to make it more believable, but yeah.
I have no trouble believing you accidentally missed Not Known's vote. After all they don't have an avatar so easy to miss. I do, however, find your reasoning for not minding E-1 or E-2 to be odd.
In post 32, AurorusVox wrote:
Also don’t like the “it’s not E-2”, “oh it doesn’t matter it’s E-2”, seems slippery
This seems misinformative to me.
The "it's not E-2" is not what was said, it was CCG typing one thing and then after getting called out on it admitting his mistake.
The "oh it doesn't matter it's E-2" was not his excuse either with the actual quote being
In post 28, CCGeek wrote:
Also IMHO, E-2 isn't really "bad" on page 1 of Day 1, and in fact, the person's reaction as well as the future development on the wagon outside RVS may provide an interesting point to analyze later in the game.
With that said, I'd prefer to not retract my vote for now, this discussion has the potential to evolve further.
Although I can understand how Aurorus might come to to these conclusions, I will be voting them. VOTE: Aurorus
Also the fact that my first vote got taken seriously I find is a little funny.
I think Aurorous summed up CCG's posts quite accurately. He did say it was not E-2 in 24, and he did say in 28 that his actions did not change when he found out it was actually E-2.
In post 17, Weuler wrote:I would never let mere odds get in the way of my intuition
Surely stating that your intuition is horribly wrong doesn't get me pushed further, right?
In all seriousness, fluff aside, the only notable thing that has happened till now is Dionysus' response, saying that Weuler's pfp loads for him, in response to me. AKA responding to fluff when he could respond to existing game content (Space's vote on him) or drop his own vote.
Therefore, I shall VOTE: Dionysus.
How is him not voting any worse than you voting to no vote?
Also don’t like the “it’s not E-2”, “oh it doesn’t matter it’s E-2”, seems slippery
VOTE: CCG
This is actually trying to get information via a question, and is a genuine stance someone could hold. This is not suspicious.
In post 39, Not Known 15 wrote:Town(by exclusion)FroggyMaybe, CCGeek, AurorusVox, Space, Weuler, Wayward Son
Scum:Dionysus, Fredrick A Campbell
VOTE: Fredrick A Campbell
(Their reactions to Dionysus being E-2 are awful)
Could you explain the difference between Campbell's reaction and Aurorus's reaction?
In post 26, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Not Known 15, Space and CCGeek are voting Dionysus, putting Dionysus at E-2.
VOTE: CCGeek
I don't believe what I quoted was an innocent mistake.
So, out of the blue Campbell assumes that this was not an innocent mistake. There is absolutely no town reason for Campbell to have this strong of an opinion. This looks like a total overreaction! Mistakes can happen, and wrongly saying that E-2 is E-3 after someone correctly said E-3 is not something scum would plan to make, usually. And because it came just 2 minutes after the previous posts it is very believable that CCGeek didn't check everything again and assumed that Weuler had made a mistake; after all, it was just one page(and people are usually overconfident that they don't make easy mistakes like that).
So, why would Campbell do this? Perhaps to avoid their partner to be put in an awkward position early...
In post 17, Weuler wrote:I would never let mere odds get in the way of my intuition
Surely stating that your intuition is horribly wrong doesn't get me pushed further, right?
In all seriousness, fluff aside, the only notable thing that has happened till now is Dionysus' response, saying that Weuler's pfp loads for him, in response to me. AKA responding to fluff when he could respond to existing game content (Space's vote on him) or drop his own vote.
Therefore, I shall VOTE: Dionysus.
Well, up until this post there was no proper game content to respond to, only fluff. None of the votes on me were serious (because I have "sus" in my name? Come on). However you are pinging me with this with trying to rush an elimination so quickly on day 1. VOTE: CCGeek
In post 37, Dionysus wrote:Actually, UNVOTE: CCGeek as don't want to rush one myself but my fos is on your for now.
and indeed, this reaction is absolutely terrible!
Trying to rush an elimination so quickly on day 1?
Honestly, I would've understood if this fuss was about me accidentally putting someone at E-1. But even in that case, on a D1, I wouldn't have withdrawn my vote, since the slot in question hasn't posted their thoughts yet.
Nope! It's not! Not withdrawing your vote after everyone knows it is E-1 isn't rushing an elimination.
And then knowing that CCGeek is at E-2(CCGeek personally said it's E-2) puts them at E-1 without saying E-1?
Then realizes the mistake and unvotes?
And that's town?
Nope. Normally, town is generally less self-aware. Here, however... doing the exact same thing you criticize? In the exact same post? Town believes in what they say. Scum doesn't, and is actually much more likely to make a thought mistake like that and then to realize what they have done.
To be fair, CCG voted when there was no game content. Dionysus's vote was cast after CCG had wrote game-relevant posts, so it's not entirely the same situation.
Post
Post #82 (isolation #21) » Sat Jan 14, 2023 9:04 pm
Postby Weuler »
In post 80, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:In my opinion, anyone who has firmly stated that I am mafia with confidence are town.
I really don't like this. You don't see any reason why maf would jump on the wagon and scumread you? You seem to say
1) "My actions have been suspicious"
2) "Town want to eliminate people who acs suspiciously"
"Hence all those who voted me are town". However, scum also likes to eliminate people who acts suspiciously, as long as they are town. Your reasoning only makes sense if you somehow know that mafia won't want to vote for you, i.e. you are scum. This whole thing seems like scum trying to emulate town reasoning.
In post 80, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:In my opinion, anyone who has firmly stated that I am mafia with confidence are town. The following are players who fall into this category:
1. Space
2. Dionysus
3. CCGeek
4. Not Known 15
...
The only person on whom his read remains constant is Space. Y'all's thoughts on this?
I still haven't got an answer why he townread space in the first place.
Post
Post #90 (isolation #25) » Sat Jan 14, 2023 10:41 pm
Postby Weuler »
In post 88, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I retroactively think I was looking suspect.
Regarding why the mafia would not attempt to push me, there is simply no need for them to do so.
Why would there be no need? If no mafia voted you, and you are town, then 5/6 of the remaining town needs to vote you for a lim. That's a lot
In post 88, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I retroactively think I was looking suspect.
Regarding why the mafia would not attempt to push me, there is simply no need for them to do so.
Why would there be no need? If no mafia voted you, and you are town, then 5/6 of the remaining town needs to vote you for a lim. That's a lot
And why would the mafia be attempting to get me executed?
Assuming you are town, scum would surely be happy to lim you?
Post
Post #100 (isolation #29) » Sun Jan 15, 2023 2:05 am
Postby Weuler »
In post 99, CCGeek wrote:If I'm getting this correctly, I believe Campbell's logic rn is something along the lines of: Scum wants to leave a "scummy" person alive till D2 for a better push. It's a rather interesting approach to a newbie game.
I don't buy it. There are other wagons around, like Dionysus's.
Post
Post #103 (isolation #31) » Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:28 am
Postby Weuler »
In post 102, Dionysus wrote:The thing with Campbell's logic is that if he is executed and is Town then the first thing I would do day 2 is look at who voted for him. So it would be a smart scum strategy to keep off him and get credit for not executing a townie.
But the argument being presented feels like scum scrabbling to try and save themselves. It doesn't feel like a townie making a pro town argument or logical deduction.
Whatever my signature says, logical deduction is quite hard to accomplish in mafia. Regarding Campbell: He is making life very easy for scum who want to hammer him by not elaborating on his reads. It is easy to discredit reads that don't have any justification whatsoever. Well-justified reads carry more weight if Camp gets hammered and flips green.
Post
Post #118 (isolation #32) » Sun Jan 15, 2023 8:43 pm
Postby Weuler »
[/vote]CampbellVOTE: To me it seems like he's dug himself a hole that he cannot get out of. I don't like the minimal answers that has been provided so far, and I cannot see why town would play in that way.
Post
Post #129 (isolation #34) » Mon Jan 16, 2023 5:42 am
Postby Weuler »
In post 128, KingTroll wrote:I do think that both wolves aren't on Campbell's wagon right now (one on, one off at most if Campbell's town as of this post) but I'm hoping Campbell can answer the questions I raised towards him and give more solid reasonings and reads on the gamestate.
Is there anyone in particular you'd like to discuss other than Campbell/Wayward? CCG is a bit interesting to me due to how defensive they got early on from Campbell's push about the elimination counts, but I'm not sure if there's anything directly AI in those posts or the method they were made.
"Both wolves". Do you somehow know that Campbell is town?
In post 131, Weuler wrote:I see, you must be really certain of that townread.
I am!
Do you want to talk about any of my other reads, such as Wayward or CCG?
Regarding CCG: Initially thought he was acting a bit odd, a good first wagon to push, if nothing else to get reactions out of other players. I don't like how he tried to come up with reasoning for Campbell.
Regarding Wayward: I agree with your observations here. He hasn't really done any analysing at all. Possibly scum
Post
Post #136 (isolation #39) » Mon Jan 16, 2023 7:44 am
Postby Weuler »
Campbell really boggles my mind. If he is town I don't see why he doesn't try to help town with some insight. If he is scum, then it is still not good scumplay. I would not be against him as d1 lim.
In post 148, Space wrote:First off, my initial impression of KingTroll was a townie but I thought Post 117 was weird as that could be an honest mistake like what I think happened with CCG, but alongside this observation from Weuler makes me start wondering why KingTroll is trying hard to attach themself with Campbell. At least, that's what it feels like to me. It's possible what you said in response to Weuler is true, and it would be a valid way to look at the game, but the way that Campbell has been handling his own situation makes me find it a bit strange.
The original edit to my introductory post was more that I put my name into my readlist, counted up, went "Oh, that's 8 people that's fine", and hit post-
I realize that I'm being a bit forceful with my townread on Campbell, but I don't find them a hit at all and I'd prefer to dissuade people from their elimination as a whole as of right now (especially with some people stating they're finding their anti-town behavior worthy of elim regardless of alignment like in post 136)! I'd much rather put pressure on and eliminate someone who is playing scummy over anti-town.
To clarify: My read on campbell is not that he is town playing badly. I definitely scumread him. The post you link to is just saying that neither town nor mafia makes perfect sense. On the other hand, he has to be one of them, and I lean mafia.
Post
Post #163 (isolation #43) » Tue Jan 17, 2023 8:29 pm
Postby Weuler »
I don't have time to write a lot right now, but I'd just like to say that I find scenario (2) above unlikely. If Fred is not limmed today, then I believe he will get limmed soon enough, which wouldn't be good for KT.
Post
Post #182 (isolation #44) » Thu Jan 19, 2023 7:40 am
Postby Weuler »
I have had a very busy week so I'm sorry for not being able to put in the required attention in the thread. I just want to say that Campbell's recent posts have made me reconsider my read slightly. Still, his earlier actions makes me hesitant to not lim.
Post
Post #242 (isolation #48) » Fri Jan 20, 2023 11:03 am
Postby Weuler »
In post 231, AurorusVox wrote:
Weuler, to be clear, have you unvoted because you believe them to be town, or because you were worried about someone hammering before LLD could post their views?
I didn't want them to get hammered before giving their reads. My read on the slot has not flipped to town, but I am less certain about them being scum. One of my main points for scumreading in the first place was Campbell's scummy logic, but I am becoming more uncertain whether that was just bad logic from Camp.
Post
Post #292 (isolation #49) » Sat Jan 21, 2023 7:52 am
Postby Weuler »
Dio has not really pinged me as scum. I am going to take a look at the arguments people have presented, but until then I am putting my vote back VOTE: Ladyλδ
Your scum list contains some people who have flown under the radar. Until this post I don't think a single person had scumread me. In particular, I don't see why scum would have reason to try to rouse suspicion against such a person (they could just NK)
Your scum list contains some people who have flown under the radar. Until this post I don't think a single person had scumread me. In particular, I don't see why scum would have reason to try to rouse suspicion against such a person (they could just NK)
As I went to sleep after posting this, I realized this argument was faulty. Precisely because someone might draw the conclusion I did in the quoted post.