2021 Fantasy Football
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
The Daniel Jones Touchdown Run Experience!In post 110, Groose Caboose wrote:I went through the game and played almost flawlessly as a farmer until the very end when my arrow keys went haywire and I crashed the wagon into a rock twice, killing everyone but my own character.-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
I consent to this draft orderIn post 121, Kmd4390 wrote:League 1 Draft Order randomized
There were 12 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
Kilgamayan
Groose Caboose
xRECKONERx
PokerFace
Panzerjager
Talitha
Nero
Yiley
racefan12
pickemgenius
Kublai Khan
D3f3nd3r-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
:toot:In post 165, Nero Cain wrote:ranged scoring for kickers narrowly wins with 9 votes to 8
I hope people enjoy this, it's unlikely to be much more than a feel-good novelty but now whoever drafts that Bengals kicker can enjoy extra points from all the 70-yard field goals he kicks-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
I believe so!In post 180, D3f3nd3r wrote:Or whoever the Broncos have since their stadium is great for kicking…is it still McManus?
I am fully anticipating that this will happen to me at least once.In post 181, PJ. wrote:
i can't wait for everyone who voted for that to lose an important game by a fifth of a point because the opposing kicker is hits a field goal 2 yards to farIn post 179, Kilgamayan wrote:
:toot:In post 165, Nero Cain wrote:ranged scoring for kickers narrowly wins with 9 votes to 8
I hope people enjoy this, it's unlikely to be much more than a feel-good novelty but now whoever drafts that Bengals kicker can enjoy extra points from all the 70-yard field goals he kicks-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
Also yeah I agree with waiver priority always being reverse of Round 1 order instead of based on odd vs. even rounds, since then it's "you chose your first player later so you get a higher priority" instead of "you chose your kicker later so you get a higher priority".-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
I almost wonder if this is a net positive, since I imagine Hyde is going to be far less of a factor working against Robinson than Etienne and Robinson would have been working against each other.
Like yeah it sucks to lose that early a pick before the season even begins, but it boosts Robinson's value by a lot, enough that Robinson/Johnson could reasonably outproduce what Etienne/Robinson (or Etienne/Johnson, I suppose) would have produced. It weakens the bench but that could very well be addressed by chance due to free agency and/or injuries.-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
This is my shocked face.In post 250, Groose Caboose wrote:Cole Beasley qualified for COVID IR-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
Such is fantasy life! At least McCaffrey should be enough to keep me from getting relegated this year, so all I can do is hope I get #1 again next year.In post 258, Groose Caboose wrote:Suggestion for next year: maybe have the draft after preseason is complete? I feel for whoever drafted JK Dobbins…-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
L1 Lockett owner here, can confirmIn post 393, Kmd4390 wrote:I'd be frustrated with Lockett at this point-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
FWIW the first word in my team's name is spelled "Tatum"In post 397, Nero Cain wrote:there's a table in the OP
If you're ever unsure you can simply remember one of the greatest pettiness NFL stories of all time-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
Went with Bridgewater because Rodgers lost his top three WRs and was visiting a very difficult fantasy pass defense while Bridgewater is getting his WR1 back this week and is hosting the literal worst fantasy pass defense.
Rodgers' final fantasy score is about what I expected, and I have a decent amount of confidence Bridgewater is going to exceed his projection.-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
Meanwhile, on the other side of that trade...In post 411, Rhinox wrote:Nice week Lockett-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
I'll need a lot to go my way to be a factor given I'm eventually facing KK with my best player on a bye weekIn post 475, D3f3nd3r wrote:Somehow staying in fifth despite moving to 6-6 and 0-4 in the division. Probably going to be me, PJ, and PEG at 6-6 fighting for two spots, with Kilga and maybe Groose a game back.-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
I would personally not mind the consolation bracket mattering in terms of determining who gets relegated, but I can understand that others would prefer to not deviate from beginning-of-season expectations (as much as I'm not sure how anyone would have managed their team differently up to this point).-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
If you really want, sure.In post 577, D3f3nd3r wrote:Can we put “zero divisional games are played” on the rule change ballot for next season-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
Yeah, I figured I'd rather treat a joke as serious than risk treating a serious request as a joke. Any joke requests will likely just get shot down in voting next year anyway, so there's no harm if something gets through accidentally.In post 583, D3f3nd3r wrote:
To be clear, this was a joke…but it could never hurt.In post 581, Kilgamayan wrote:
If you really want, sure.In post 577, D3f3nd3r wrote:Can we put “zero divisional games are played” on the rule change ballot for next season
At some point "soon" when I have the time, I'd like to start writing down/organizing potential poll questions and tossing ideas out there so people have ample time to consider where they fall on issues before next season begins. Ideally, I'd like there to be time to bandy question ideas about,anda time where general question ideas are basically locked in but the details of the responses can be discussed, so people know what they're getting into before a rule changes questionnaire is released.
For the purposes of full disclosure, it is my desire to word poll questions in order to minimize risk of related answer options getting each other's way and resulting in a plurality victory for an option that a majority of the league would have voted against. For example, I consider a question like "How many points should receptions be worth" with answers like "0", "0.5", and "1" to be suboptimal, since it is possible for a majority of the league to prefer some sort of PPR but for the winning answer to be the non-PPR option. I would prefer something along the lines of the following:
"What is your PPR scoring system preference?"
"a. I would prefer PPR with receptions worth 1 point."
"b. I would prefer PPR with receptions worth 0.5 point."
"c. "I would prefer no PPR, but if there is PPR, I would prefer receptions be worth 1 point."
"d. "I would prefer no PPR, but if there is PPR, I would prefer receptions be worth 0.5 point."
With a setup like this, PPR versus non-PPR answers can be counted, and then, if PPR wins, 0.5 answers versus 1 answers can be counted.
Alternatively, depending on how fancy we want to get, we could use the "0", "0.5", and "1" options and determine a winner using Borda count, or pairwise comparisons, or some other system that accounts for nuance.
I'm putting this out here now so people have time to consider whether or not this approach is something they want, and to pick someone else to run the league if they don't like the way I'd like to run it.-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 386
- Joined: September 22, 2010
- Location: Location, Location
I had these in mind should people be fine with me, don't worry.In post 619, PokerFace wrote:Whoever runs league 1 next year please be sure to cover voting options for consolation bracket mattering and playoffs getting reseeded please-
-
Kilgamayan Goon
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.