I've stated my opinion in 3554.In post 3772, zMuffinMan wrote:like, for example,In post 3769, zMuffinMan wrote:nothing in particular, but you're not trying to interact with mac at all, really. which just seems kind of odd.PV wrote:Mac hasn't been around, and his isos (him and predecessors) are pretty uninformative. If you have something to point out, please do.
|------------------------------------------------|
amount of analysis you've done on baezu today
|-|
amount of analysis you've done on mac today
i see no real intent to interact with mac, either. granted he's currently v/la, but i'm talking about prior to this.
er... don't really follow this. she said amrun's attack seemed somewhat scummy in 1195 then later changed it to null. how does your reasoning apply here?pv wrote:Because she had no reason to give for why she was scummy without addressing the huge attack on her for 14+ days. You can't ignore it then bring it up later without causing suspicion.
Titus thinks Mac is town, I asked why.
Nobody else has an opinion on Mac.
You want Mac interaction? Make him post.
And since I did Baezu, I'll let you analyze ArcAngel/Mac's slot. Maybe you'll catch something I missed.