I need to log off, and I'm afraid I won't be on to see the deadline. The most helpful thing I can do I think is leave a grendel vote and hope for the best.
The chance of the wine in front of me being poisoned is greater than the wine in front of him being poisoned because he thinks that I'll want his drink.
But that last scenario is more likely than the wine being in front of me because he might suspect that I'd change my mind about taking his drink.
The moral of the story is, the odds are better when one keeps it simple.
I had a whole thing typed out, but I realized it was crap.
I'm just saying I don't think people are intentionally trying to make us think they are doing things more than they are just naturally reacting to them. The wifom argument can go deep into many layers, but the first layer should be the most likely. I was just promoting the keep it simple principal for no reason I guess, or many reasons that I don't really want to sit and work on explaining.
perhaps the reason G is worried about me "bussing" M is because his partner is M and he wants to give SIV something reasonable to believe tmr when he kills rubi tonight?
We know one of them if scum, so if its both then thats the case.
GTown/MScum: Kinda sets up for an awoo/siv/G day 4
Gscum/Mtown: Makes no sense because why is he worried for tomorrow
Both scim: Makes sense, bus
Still want that M lynch today, someone pls fix, but i will hammer G if I don't get it.
The only other options for Maestro are to shoot you (which makes it a moot point) or me (has some issues - Awoo shooting me over you would have been strange).
I'm pretty convinced that Maestro is the final scum.
I don't think you ever shift the lynch off Maestro onto Grendel yesterday as scum. Not to mention you were clearly planning to push Awoo today, so shooting him would be uh. An unusual choice.
In post 855, Rubicon wrote:I would still like you to clarify who you think that player should be.
I said I wanted to lynch Maestro. The logical conclusion should be that I want him to be the one to lead with his vote.
Not happening. I don’t trust you and you’ve done absolutely nothing to make me want to work with you this game. Nothing at all. I can quite honestly say I wish you hadn’t replaced in.
In post 855, Rubicon wrote:I would still like you to clarify who you think that player should be.
I said I wanted to lynch Maestro. The logical conclusion should be that I want him to be the one to lead with his vote.
Not happening. I don’t trust you and you’ve done absolutely nothing to make me want to work with you this game. Nothing at all. I can quite honestly say I wish you hadn’t replaced in.
I won’t be voting at all.
This is not SvS.
Most people don't like being hard bussed by their scum partners, especially when there hasn't been an attempt to work together first. It kind of sucks to be on that side of things. Read the last line from that perspective.
I would rather not go too deep into this, but I kind of think this was a 100% genuine post. It just feels like an icky thing to describe this as alignment-indicative. Knowing that's probably a real argument and knowing that this would be their last interaction before one of them was lynched.
In post 997, Rubicon wrote:Most people don't like being hard bussed by their scum partners, especially when there hasn't been an attempt to work together first.
In post 993, Rubicon wrote:I don't think you ever shift the lynch off Maestro onto Grendel yesterday as scum. Not to mention you were clearly planning to push Awoo today, so shooting him would be uh. An unusual choice.
Weird that you should mention this, since Grendel was pushing me ALL DAY as a counter-wagon to you, which would make sense if he knew my mislynch would end the game with a win for you two. Did he even get to post before we flash-wagoned him? Bet that fucked up his chainsaw defense. Ballsy.
((