I still lean towards a wing lynch but after isoing fatso, we may a alternate option...
starts out with a rvs and then votes to no lynch, after game theory nonsense he votes me, because he "never saw my posts"
a couple of eyebrows raised there^
unvotes the next post and then his tenth post happens:
Quick question here: you CAN claim to be a certain role in a post, right? I thought I read differently somewhere, but that wouldn't make much sense, and like I said I'm having problems remembering things right now.
why this question? and why is it worded this way?
11th-12th posts acknowledges ray and thanks him publicly which was odd to say the least. at most, would it be coaching?
his next few posts are one liners. then he foses wing and me. that right there is pretty damn scummy, Fosing the the current BW and fosing someone else.. is he trying to cover himself?
next we have the sheeping/barning thing though he makes a good point in his iso 20, what would be the point of him typing what everyone else said? I don't get that myself, if you try to type it out it will be construed as "saying what everyone else has said"/sheeping and if you don't you are lurk/sheeping. can someone explain this? i've seen both criticized as such and i'm confused.
he then calls wing "to scummy to be scum". what you need to understand is no town, unless a power role, goes out of his way to save himself.
the rest is just one liners. he takes back his last read on wing, voting him, and then foses like crazy.
this looks to me like a classic scum ISO. he blends to well and his content has been subpar.