Blitz 1: C9++ (GAME OVER!)
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 19, Titus wrote:
We confirm the possible setups making kills hard for scums. This is an open setup. Popcorn massclaim is ideal. Plus we get thoughts fast. Slow game wait, fast game immediately.
Why are you lying?
Vote: Titus-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 32, Titus wrote:In post 31, Marge wrote:In post 19, Titus wrote:
We confirm the possible setups making kills hard for scums. This is an open setup. Popcorn massclaim is ideal. Plus we get thoughts fast. Slow game wait, fast game immediately.
Why are you lying?
Vote: Titus
Lol. Not lying.
How does any of the following make kill choices hard for scum?
Setup
1 Cop , 1 Doctor , 2 Mafia Goons , 3 Townies ;
1 Cop , 2 Mafia Goons , 4 Townie
1 Doctor , 2 Mafia Goons , 4 Townie
2 Mafia Goons , 5 Townie-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 37, Titus wrote:In post 34, Marge wrote:In post 32, Titus wrote:In post 31, Marge wrote:In post 19, Titus wrote:
We confirm the possible setups making kills hard for scums. This is an open setup. Popcorn massclaim is ideal. Plus we get thoughts fast. Slow game wait, fast game immediately.
Why are you lying?
Vote: Titus
Lol. Not lying.
How does any of the following make kill choices hard for scum?
Setup
1 Cop , 1 Doctor , 2 Mafia Goons , 3 Townies ;
1 Cop , 2 Mafia Goons , 4 Townie
1 Doctor , 2 Mafia Goons , 4 Townie
2 Mafia Goons , 5 Townie
You're forgetting the fact scum have to fake claim. When they kill people, it becomes obvious as to what they are.
Plus this is a thirteen player game. You're using the wrong setup.
Oh.
I signed up seeing the list mod link.
Unvote-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 46, Titus wrote:In post 45, Marge wrote:Also one flaw is the set up may have an sk
Not a flaw. An additional kpn makes it harder on scum to fake claim.
Looks like scum will know there is an sk and just relay on them for kills-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 55, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 44, Marge wrote:I feel sad now knowing the set up had more possiblities and getting a vt role
Actually
VOTE: marge
opposes massclaim
claims role
I thought the set up was different.
Is it a thing not to read the game for you?
Vote: blocky-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 80, Firebringer wrote:In post 78, Titus wrote:No. I didn't. I am terrible with jokes.
Lets get drunk Titus in here.
She is at least fun with jokes.
Sober Titus is alright, but too serious.
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 101, Vedith wrote:So did we get down to why Marge role revealed after being against it?
Yes but people just can't bother reading my post-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 79, Marge wrote:In post 55, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 44, Marge wrote:I feel sad now knowing the set up had more possiblities and getting a vt role
Actually
VOTE: marge
opposes massclaim
claims role
I thought the set up was different.
Is it a thing not to read the game for you?
Vote: blocky
Flubbernugget wrote:No and you're not voting for her so you're next on my scum list
Marge wrote:In post 101, Vedith wrote:So did we get down to why Marge role revealed after being against it?
Yes but people just can't bother reading my post
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 107, Vedith wrote:In post 104, Marge wrote:In post 101, Vedith wrote:So did we get down to why Marge role revealed after being against it?
Yes but people just can't bother reading my post
Can you show me where?
I see that you thought the setup was different... But you still revealed that you are VT when you was against it.
Or are you okay with a Mass claim now?
I thought the set up was not something that could be judged as easy as Titus. Seeing the correct set up I have no issue.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 109, Vedith wrote:But you don't explain anything apart from you getting the setup wrong.
You still revealed that you ate VT - Why?
Why not?-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 110, Persivul wrote:In post 44, Marge wrote:I feel sad now knowing the set up had more possiblities and getting a vt role
In post 104, Marge wrote:In post 101, Vedith wrote:So did we get down to why Marge role revealed after being against it?
Yes but people just can't bother reading my post
OK, read it and it looks like you made a vt claim for no good reason.
Sure with an ISO.
I just followed totus logic to see where it goes.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
Im getting the impression players reach conclusion based on snippets around here.
My orginal issue with the claiming was entirely based on Titus saying that it could be used to hurt scum.
When I saw the set up was indeed different I saw no harm in claiming but then after I thought maybe a sk could hurt the claim idea but I don't know that it will.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 118, Titus wrote:Marge do you know what popcorn massclaim is?
Yes.
Are we doing that?
If so I want firebringer to claim next-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 129, Ranger wrote:Though I admit Marge is possibly scum, too. I think four is possible with the setup, but what combo, not positive of yet.
Overall, pretty confident in {BlockyMan, Firebringer, Marge, EspeciallyTheLies}. I'd be extremely surprised to see a scum outside these names.
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 134, Titus wrote:In post 121, Marge wrote:In post 118, Titus wrote:Marge do you know what popcorn massclaim is?
Yes.
Are we doing that?
If so I want firebringer to claim next
Blocky's up. That was part of my theory. Blocky should claim PR or VT then popcorn.
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 154, BlockyMan wrote:I do think marge is scum too. I think we got 2 of em.
I'd do 1 vs 1 with you.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 159, Ranger wrote:(Though Ythan is pretty town, too.)
I'm not seeing that. I just see one liners so far.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
You are clearly not a newbie so why does bizarre = scum?-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 179, Flubbernugget wrote:Okay I'm home from work so I should be better able to talk about Marge
So I'm not a big fan of cherrypicking posts for reads but I'm making an exception here
Look at 44 and 45
When town fucks up a claim they show it. Marge had no reaction between claiming and then realizing that probably isn't a good idea. Like some sort of an "oh fuck" feeling to their post. Now compare that to the massive amounts of ate spilled when she got suspected. It doesn't line up with how a genuine game-solver should be thinking
It's like everything I posted just goes ignored and you call it AtE.
I'll just ignore everything you say, ask you to repeat yourself on something you didn't say then tell me that you feel inclined to be nice about it or rude.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
Just going to point to my question ignored.
Kraeg also holds his vote despite seeing something that he took as a scum claim-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 196, BlockyMan wrote:Marge, your acting a little weird there.
I'm just posting my thoughts since I've either had players ignore my questions or bypass anything I say completely.
I figure if I'm going to have any conversation I might as well chat with myself.
So why the scum read on Titus?-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 200, BlockyMan wrote:Marge still has an RVS vote on me.
PEDIT: I don't know, he has been buddying people, and I read buddying as scummy.
PEDIT 2: Pretty much the same reasons everyone else has.
No it's not an rvs vote.
That is pretty non-specific reasoning you put down.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 209, BlockyMan wrote:Titus was saying I "lurked" And was voting me because I want offline for 3 hours to watch football games. He called me out for lurking after 15 minutes.
Also the massclaim seemed like scum trying to find power roles.
PEDIT FLUBBER: Im at L-1, and I would like someone else to vote Ranger before I vote him.
I'm thinking the first was just because you posted and thought he could bring you out with a pressure vote.
The second thing is null. Those calling it scummy have yet to explain why it's scummy.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 229, Persivul wrote:Blocky shouldn't be at L-1. Agreeing with the current wagons can be opportunistic. It can also mean that the people on those wagons are making good arguments and persuading people, which is what town is supposed to do. I rather think someone is opportunistic when they make abrupt changes from one wagon to another.
On the positive side, he noted that Ranger is buddying, which is something I thought too after Ranger proposed a town block.
Four people - Kraeg, Ocean, Kop, ETL - have post counts in the single digits. I'll bet there's 1-2 scum there. From the rest I'm suspicious of Marge and Ranger.
I hate Titus' breaking idea, but I butt heads with Titus on breaking almost every time we play together so that's not giving me a read.
Asking for a town block is not buddying.
OMG
US-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 233, Persivul wrote:
Depends on how and why it's done.
OMG
US
That's ridiculous. I've been against your claim since the beginning.
Why is when ranger doing it scummy?
There is nothing wrong with my claim. As I said I never was against it and second it's not scummy to claim.-
-
Marge
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 238, Kraeg wrote:I find the wagon on Blocky scummy. It's interesting how he got into L-1 so quick by just watching a football game.
In post 241, Flubbernugget wrote:
Part of me says yay Marge wagon and part of me says votes like these are going to make it form like the blocky wagon you're complaining about
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
Dear Diary,
I have learned so much from this strange game of mafia. The players think lurking isn't scummy.
Is it me or is that crazy?
Besides the lack of reading and comprehension I'm predicting a scum win for the very first blitz mafia game.
It's sad that I get a better conversation from my Homie then I get from the players who are in this game.
Well diary, I guess I should maybe start drinking like my husband and play dumb from here on in.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 245, Persivul wrote:In post 241, Flubbernugget wrote:
Part of me says yay Marge wagon and part of me says votes like these are going to make it form like the blocky wagon you're complaining about
If it forms like that I'll reconsider, but as she's only at L-5 by my count, it's not a serious concern yet.
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
Persivul wrote:In post 244, Marge wrote:Dear Diary,
I have learned so much from this strange game of mafia. The players think lurking isn't scummy.
Is it me or is that crazy?
You're generalizing without cause, but yeah, Kraeg's response is suspicious.
Besides the lack of reading and comprehension I'm predicting a scum win for the very first blitz mafia game.
It's sad that I get a better conversation from my Homie then I get from the players who are in this game.
Well diary, I guess I should maybe start drinking like my husband and play dumb from here on in.
Quit playing the martyr. You only have 2 votes.
Claiming outside of an agreed-upon massclaim is bad for town. In my first game here I claimed VT unprompted and took massive amounts of shit for it. A few players with big reputations can get away with it, but in general it's frowned upon.
By claiming VT, either:
- you've narrowed down the pool of potential PRs for scum to aim at, or
- you're lying
Either way it doesn't come across good.
Where you town or scum the game you are referring to?
If town, then again why is this scummy to you?
If scum, carry on.
And again, it's not scummy anything you stated. I'm not being a martyr. I'm commenting because of the following:
I've asked questions that players do not respond to.
I have explained my actions multiple times to the point the subject is really just dumb or people tunnel because???
You tell me why it should make sense at all.
There is an ignore feature on this site and no one has told me about it, right?
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 461, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:In post 458, Titus wrote:Your argument seems overly nitpicky. If you hate Persivul's (the people on the wagon are scummy) why not have him talk more? Sure I think Persivul is being an idiot ATM but not a scummy one.
His turn on you is good as well.
His "turn"? You've got to be kidding me Titus...
*sigh*
I feel like you aren't really reading the posts and just want to push your thing on Blocky. It's really stretching and I get that if you're town you want to push it through to see if you are right, but I don't see it and I explained why.
Persivul's posts are increasingly bad, and I'm quite disappointed with people's inability to even digest the argument.
I'm gonna give this game 24 hours but I'm starting to regret continuing with this playerlist against my better judgement.
Banging you head against a wall does seem to have more appeal then this game.
I was slightly scum reading persivul mostly because his whole scum read is based on something he did as town.
That logic makes about as much sense as:
Spoiler:
Vote: persivul-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 447, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:In post 442, Titus wrote:Spoiler: Blocky ISO
You want hand holding. Ok?
5-7 RVS. Vanishes "to watch football" at the first sign of pressure.
titus... c'mon now. If this was a valid argument, why didn't ANYONE vote me the entire time I was gone?
57-59 he's read up and removes his RVS vote, implying he thinks I'm town. (If he thought otherwise, he'd defend his RVS vote).
Is this a point? I don't understand what this is doing here. It is IIoA.
62-66, Trolling and RVS. No real reads despite having read.
No I disagree. He was responding to people.
143, jumps me as his counter wagon and objects to my push.
So? What is scummy about that?
He says nothing about the massclaim or any substantive discussion (which is my true gripe he strawmans).
Again... so? What is scummy about that? This is missing conclusions. I didn't ask for hand holding, Titus. I asked you to state your case, which you are not doing here. I'm not particularly interested in Blocky because I don't feel strongly about him at all. You asked if I'd help you and honestly the answer is no at this point because I don't see the case.
194, Spurious empty "buddying" accusation against Ranger plus me and marge are his other scumreads. He never supports this or does anything to solve anyone's alignment.
Eh. Ok so he makes an accusation. That's good. Your issue is that he didn't follow up on it, is that correct?
196, Vague weird assertion.
200, Whines about Marge's vote. Doesn't explain his Ranger scumread. Agrees with everyone else.
He does explain his read, he said he feels that buddying is scummy. I could see a case for parroting reads as being scummy but not in the way it was delivered here.
209-212, Protect me from the big bad Titus.
Where does he say that? Someone asked why he didn't like you and he answered. In his ISO he was gone for 3 hours, and I agree, that was the only reasoning I could find at that time for that wagon, so he's not wrong. I don't see the case here.
There's zero scumhunting here. No questions. No attempts to persuade people. He's afraid to take any sort of risk on his scumreads. He's stalled any sort of engagement.
I don't really agree with this because he's made accusations and given his thoughts, and responded to questioning.
A lot of this is unnecessary PBPA and IIoA, Titus. I'm sure you know how I respond to that kind of stuff. I wanted a general overview of your case with key quotes and you gave me his entire damn ISO as if I haven't already read it and the context it came in. I appreciate your effort and thoughts on the posts but you have neglected to make any real conclusions, other than saying "Blocky did this in this post". Do you understand my issue with this "case"? It doesn't really exist beyond one or two points. I think it's a real stretch on your part.
I've had my fill for this game today.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
Flubbernugget wrote:In post 359, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Those of you who aren't voting Persivul need to explain to me why not in a way that doesn't involve "Blocky is better" because he's not. He's a meh lynch. His ISO isn't fantastic but it isn't super scummy either, like Persivul's is. I've pointed out several things wrong here. He hedged on Titus, which I could see as her way of gaining reactions, especially given her call for a wagon on herself off the jump. And understand that it wasn't the idea of mass claim that he hedged on - it was hedging on what he thought it meant about her alignment. "I'm not saying you are or aren't scummy for this... blah blah blah". It's literally disgusting.
Second, he claims that Marge is a better lynch but has literally done nothing at all to further or develop that read, or any other read whatsoever.
And when asked about his read on Blocky, his best answer is "the wagon is bad because votes and my read has dropped." Ok.. what?
When pushed he comes up with some ridiculous non-sequiter to run after in an effort to derail the questioning of him and shift the focus. It is literally nonsense to ask a player why he should vote someone the other person isn't scumreading or pushing.
Come on.
p-edit: posts that I will read.
I've already said that waffling on Titus d1 isn't a scum tell
And I'm not keen on sheeping someone that's questioning the massclaim while participating in it
I think you should read this.
http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/keep+harping+on-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
Well you may get to call him out for lurking: http://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php?a ... 6&sr=posts
But I'm sure there is another football game excuse.-
-
Marge Goon
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 492, Persivul wrote:In post 467, Marge wrote:In post 461, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:In post 458, Titus wrote:Your argument seems overly nitpicky. If you hate Persivul's (the people on the wagon are scummy) why not have him talk more? Sure I think Persivul is being an idiot ATM but not a scummy one.
His turn on you is good as well.
His "turn"? You've got to be kidding me Titus...
*sigh*
I feel like you aren't really reading the posts and just want to push your thing on Blocky. It's really stretching and I get that if you're town you want to push it through to see if you are right, but I don't see it and I explained why.
Persivul's posts are increasingly bad, and I'm quite disappointed with people's inability to even digest the argument.
I'm gonna give this game 24 hours but I'm starting to regret continuing with this playerlist against my better judgement.
Banging you head against a wall does seem to have more appeal then this game.
I was slightly scum reading persivul mostly because his whole scum read is based on something he did as town.
That logic makes about as much sense as:
Spoiler:
Vote: persivul
It was kinda apparent from before, but FWIW...if you want to keep your alts to yourself, you need a different image source, as "farside22" is part of the image's address.
<3-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 498, Titus wrote:@Ocean, you opened with a wall recycling my exact thoughts but state to do so on D2 or D3 when scum know if there is an SK or not. Boooo
You do a lot of tearing down and promoting focus on having people fight regarding their Persivul reads.
You say nothing about Marge (vig target numero uno). Why? What's your read there?
I like ocean's read on Kop. Kop is in the middle keeping the fight going.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 505, Persivul wrote:This post is much more interesting now that we know you're farside:
In post 44, Marge wrote:I feel sad now knowing the set up had more possiblities and getting a vt role
From Marge, a newbie to the site, it's reasonable that you clicked the wrong link and misunderstood the setup. From farside, who's been here forever and frequently mods games herself, it's bullshit. You pulled the "feel sad" bit to sneak in a VT claim without being too obvious about it. Tactical reasons to do so:
If you're scum, you get the claim in early, probably because you were afraid of being picked late in a popcorn massclaim and your options might have been limited.
If you're town and you're telling the truth, you're just playing for self preservation. You make it less likely that scum will NK you, and therefore more likely that they'll hit a PR, which is anti-town.
If you're town and you're lying (i.e. a pR trying to protect yourself), counting the Marge BS about setup, that's your second lie already. A LAL PL isn't a bad play for D1.
So, are you scum, anti-town, or a liar?
*Put on glasses*
*look at paper in head*
It is well documented that the player in question is known or ADD.
*puts paper down*
For maybe the 4th time I never said I was opposed to mass claim. I asked about the benefits of claiming.
You can link all the post in the world and none say I was ever against mass claim.-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
That post was thinking the set up was something else, obviously.
Titus wrote:@500- Scum would on day 2. I am presuming any vigs that shoot would claim D2. Then scum can count the number of kills and get a good idea of whether or not there is an SK. Thus by Day 2, scum would know if there is an SK. It's best to force scum to claim with as little info as possible.
The blocky wagon is likely all town. It should stay. The amount of Defense blocky's slot gets while doing nothing is astounding.
@All, I do like the reasons on Kop. Big shock they are the same reasons Blocky is wagoned though.
I'm just waiting a bit. There is still 2 days left here.
-