VOTE: Malakittens
optimal tbh.In post 36, Lorne Malvo wrote:I don't think I'd be playing any differently if my alignment was different
I can imagine my followers crying if I was Kira and already at L-1 during Day 1 because I did a little trolling
optimal tbh.In post 36, Lorne Malvo wrote:I don't think I'd be playing any differently if my alignment was different
I can imagine my followers crying if I was Kira and already at L-1 during Day 1 because I did a little trolling
Just kinda picked someone at random, my experience with scum!Mala was only the one game so this one isn't going so far as to say she's on a roll with getting scum.In post 72, Gimli wrote:hi HPE looking forward to playing with you againIn post 63, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Well, hello there. This one appears to be late to the big Kira Suspect Convention.
VOTE: Malakittens
optimal tbh.In post 36, Lorne Malvo wrote:I don't think I'd be playing any differently if my alignment was different
I can imagine my followers crying if I was Kira and already at L-1 during Day 1 because I did a little trolling
why are you voting mala? cause she is always scum?
any thoughts on players so far?
He isn't particularly doing anything of value right now with his posts imo, but its too early for this one to go and throw a vote for that it feels.In post 91, Gimli wrote:you mean you think kokichi is boring? does that mean anything alignment-wise for him in your opinion?In post 85, HighPrincessErinys wrote:
Just kinda picked someone at random, my experience with scum!Mala was only the one game so this one isn't going so far as to say she's on a roll with getting scum.
Kokichi is ZZZ, this one doesn't think it super trusts Lorne and the skill claim, and Black's pro-active stance is nice to see. Strong opinions on multiple people seems to just not really be my thing this one notices but it'll try and not constantly have lukewarm reads on most people this time around.
People are simply voicing their suspicions of you. This one can't say it particularly disagrees with the reasons why either. This one is debating if it wants to join them or not because it agrees you're kind of scummy and it honestly doesn't think we should be as reserved as we're being about taking out Followers.In post 120, Kokichi Oma wrote:What do you think about the votes on me then? Surely I must not be doing something right for multiple people to vote me? Or do you think people are just jumping on an early wagon to see? I'd like to get your opinion on each vote on me based on this post.In post 102, HighPrincessErinys wrote:He isn't particularly doing anything of value right now with his posts imo, but its too early for this one to go and throw a vote for that it feels.In post 91, Gimli wrote:you mean you think kokichi is boring? does that mean anything alignment-wise for him in your opinion?In post 85, HighPrincessErinys wrote:
Just kinda picked someone at random, my experience with scum!Mala was only the one game so this one isn't going so far as to say she's on a roll with getting scum.
Kokichi is ZZZ, this one doesn't think it super trusts Lorne and the skill claim, and Black's pro-active stance is nice to see. Strong opinions on multiple people seems to just not really be my thing this one notices but it'll try and not constantly have lukewarm reads on most people this time around.
Also find a better Gotcha to spring on someone. Like you're right this is an oops hypocrisy moment. But this is really eh.In post 212, Kokichi Oma wrote:In post 158, Gimli wrote: so I think (mala, koki) is where things can be sinceI'm kinda nullscum read on mala's entrance and talking to enchant instead of talking to people
How ironic
This one kinda hates this stance, trying to just coast by silent and passing it off as "it's preventing scum from getting info!" gives me very bad vibes. Progressing my RV on Mala to a genuine vote.In post 182, Malakittens wrote: ngl
i usually just glide over setup-talk/setup-spec only because its not a strong suit of mine. i try to stay out of it at all costs.
I believe it's just better to stay quiet of all costs bc we dont want scum getting any more information.
Though obviously it's kind of... vague and unclear still and in a section not everyone is going to read if they read the actual rules.3. Without skills, you have no idea who died players are, but they are surely not Kira or Detective. If Kira died, Game ends instantly. If Detective dies, you will learn at closest day start.
In post 217, Kokichi Oma wrote:It's called a joke, I'm still NAI on Gimli.In post 216, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Also find a better Gotcha to spring on someone. Like you're right this is an oops hypocrisy moment. But this is really eh.
Are you like, sure? Because your vote on Azu is pretty flimsy imo even if you try to paint it the way you did. Azu's vote at face value had barely anything to do with Gimli and this one doesn't see a point where Gimli admits you're a 'wrong read' like you claim. This is actually a packet of lies in general now that this one's analyzed.In post 259, Kokichi Oma wrote: If I thought you were scummy, I'd be voting you. I'm voting who i think is scummy so far.
In post 262, Kokichi Oma wrote:Maybe you should like.. Read the interactions with me and Gimli. I've explained my thoughts on him already. I think Azu's vote was bad because of not only what I said but also the timing.In post 261, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Gimli starts scumreading you, this one expresses doubt about you as well but doesn't vote, Azu follows up by saying "It's never too early to follow your dreams" and votes for you. This otherwise tells us nothing about how they got there for better or worse, but importantly does not implicate Gimli's points as part of their reasoning and could be literally any thing else under the sun. And you claim now that Azu was hopping onto some obviously Gimli-brand bandwagon that he somewhere stated is actually phony? Get real, as it were.
This one thinks it did find where Gimli concedes one wrong point about meta (snore) out of... the entire rest of his argument, but either way this doesn't really change the fact your actual vote on Azu might as well be paper-thin here considering what you said is, as previously established, kinda hogwash.In post 263, Kokichi Oma wrote: One thinks you are trying to paint me as scummy for things one does not think is that scummy.
You don't need to have a vendetta against Azu for this one to call you out, y'know. Gimli/Black/Vander/Azu townlean, Mala/STD nullscum, Lorne nulltown (this one needs to give his ISO an intensive read honestly his posts have just been flying over my head but my vaguest impressions are that hes town-ish-y), Kawaii null. It's like 4:46am so don't take these TOO seriously until they're iterated upon at a more reasonable state of wakeness.In post 273, Kokichi Oma wrote:And one still thinks you're trying to push on a narrative that is also paper thin. Have I been telling everyone to vote Azu or pushing them intensively? You also seem to be solely focused on me, despite others having similar votes without much weight. Which Makes me question your motive. Your posts have been 90% about me. What do you think about the rest of the game so far?
You and Gimli's posts were always required in order to talk about your Azu vote considering you brought Gimli's posts into the conversation. And why does your story keep changing? In that linked post you can see pretty clearly what is, pretty undeniably, some kind of reason for voting Azu. And then you gave another. And now you're saying you never had a reason? Is claiming your vote on Azu was without reason even a good idea??In post 329, Kokichi Oma wrote:Out of all those I am suspect of HPE's line of questioning since their bases was on gimli and me's interaction and when I proved that wrong, they kinda brushed it to the side and tried to make it based on me voting Azu and tried to paint it as me pushing them for a bad reason when I didn't even give a reason.In post 299, Lorne Malvo wrote: I respect that people are pushing a top poster, it's not very common
While Azu's own lack of reasoning for their vote is starting to fester, this one believes their posts to be solidly towny otherwise, if laconic. All of their mechspec has been pointing out things that are in the favor of town, and 284 is literally just solving. There's a vibes aspect but their actual play is, in my opinion, town.In post 325, Kokichi Oma wrote:Azu townlean. Gotta at least explain that one
...And this one is starting to see what Gimli means, it thinks.In post 326, Kokichi Oma wrote:YikesIn post 276, Gimli wrote: I really like HPE's posts, the push on kokichi, and all its leans. I'm calling a towncore of black/vander/HPE aorn, with a townread on Azu. I agree with leaving lorne and STD at null atm. I think flipping inside of (koki, mala, kawaii) is good for d1.
It is actually rather quite simple to just start scumhunting. You can do it in the same posts as defending yourself even.In post 355, Kokichi Oma wrote: Considering the fact that me and your posting has taken up about over 50% of the post and the most of that me trying to defend myself instead of being given the opportunity to find scum, is probably the reason.
At this point a daykill on Kawaii doesn't feel necessary. Sinking into background is feeling more and more like a scum thing to this one but even if we condemn them in a day or two it honestly doesn't think it would be worth it especially for the detective reveal. And then there's the aspect of when you wait multiple days, the gamestate and what we know and who's scummiest will change. Condemn now = Total gamble, condemn later = We don't even know if we'd want to at that point. Thus if you want Kawaii dead NOW, vote them. Though again this one prefers dragging the game days out for max discussion and analysis.In post 377, Vanderscamp wrote:I am extremely down to daykill Kawaii.In post 362, Kokichi Oma wrote: Okay it's independent of me. Then okay. And I don't think we're going to vote out Kawaii today anyway, so no point.
I'm actually just going to look through iso's and stop trying to defend myself cause my back and forth with you is distracting me too much.
I don't like the fact that Kawaii has never responded to me calling out that post I thought was scummy, or asked me about my vote.
There is not a lick of defense for Kawaii in there, this one is just saying Vote > Detective's Condemn on killing them.In post 382, Gimli wrote:I didn't understand anything you wrote.In post 381, HighPrincessErinys wrote:
At this point a daykill on Kawaii doesn't feel necessary. Sinking into background is feeling more and more like a scum thing to this one but even if we condemn them in a day or two it honestly doesn't think it would be worth it especially for the detective reveal. And then there's the aspect of when you wait multiple days, the gamestate and what we know and who's scummiest will change. Condemn now = Total gamble, condemn later = We don't even know if we'd want to at that point. Thus if you want Kawaii dead NOW, vote them. Though again this one prefers dragging the game days out for max discussion and analysis.
we are eliminating kawaii cause it's the most likely kira rn and your defense is word salad which is quite frankly very alarming.
the more people write weird things about kawaii and softdefend them with crappy or obscure reasoning, the more I wanna just go ahead and get that elimination through. I think I'm convinced we need to flip kawaii.
If VS actually meant voting Kawaii out when they said "daykill" then he's confused us both.In post 393, Black wrote:Oh I think you're right. My brain isn't working right todayIn post 389, Kokichi Oma wrote:I think they just mean vote out.In post 386, Black wrote:Wait what??? Did you just say the Detective should out themselves and use their dayvig to kill kawaii?
Then follow your heart's desire as you please. The longer it takes Kawaii (AND Mala) to resurface, the more this one grows wary of them.In post 396, Gimli wrote: ah
no of course he didn't mean out the detective. we can just vote out a scummy slot. we don't need to out the detective to do that.
Still don't know where you're getting a Kawaii defense from especially now that the whole "daykill" thing is sorted.In post 426, Gimli wrote: I just don't buy it was a gambit by kame, I think he has to say something to defend himself now anyway so saying that is as good as anything. I think it's relevant that kokichi/HPE/black all defended kawaii to some extent (with black ignoring kawaii and pushing me for confidence) so we have a completely fitting story to push throguh and figure out. koki wasn't working for kira cause everyone was fine hanging him. with kawaii there's more resistance with much less reasoning to be townreading. I started getting heat by black after I was set with the kawaii flip and whatnot.
I also think it's funny that koki is saying people are sheeping me when everyone that's scumreading kawaii is doing so independently, clearly. it's just a blatantly scum play so far and defending it from the angle of 'gimli is sus' doesn't feel right.
Resistance =/= Correct. As an obvious example, pushing a confirmed Cop is going to get you a giant pile of it. You're getting resistance because people don't see you as having a point or making a good read, unlike Kokichi who several people agreed was acting scummy. It's secondhand defense by virtue of the push itself being bad even if none of us are exactly Kawaii fans.In post 480, Gimli wrote:I started to push kawaii, and suddenly people started defending him. when I was pushing kokichi, there was no resistance from any parts of the thread. when I started pushing kawaii, I started to become a wagon myself. that increases the likelihood that I'm onto something and that's why I'm pursuing this elimination, to the very end and even if I annoy enough townies to be flipped for it.
This one had him previously pegged as nulltown needing an ISO reread (that it forgot to do).In post 513, KawaiiKame wrote:Was Lorne your townread?In post 511, HighPrincessErinys wrote: VOTE: Lorne Malvo
Today feels like the day where all of my townreads make asses of themselves.
Lorne being weird likeIn post 516, Kokichi Oma wrote:See what happens when you stop tunneling one person and look at the posts from others?In post 511, HighPrincessErinys wrote: VOTE: Lorne Malvo
Today feels like the day where all of my townreads make asses of themselves.
What makes you suddenly think me a follower? Because this one won't vote Kawaii with you?In post 617, Gimli wrote:ur probably rightIn post 605, Vanderscamp wrote:I strongly believe black is not a follower, I think the initial post about not understanding what followers know was genuine.In post 432, Gimli wrote: if i'm detective or assistant then I still want props from getting the rest of it right:
1. Detective - mala
2. Assistant - STD
3. Taskforce Member - vander
4. Taskforce Member - meg
5. Taskforce Member - gimli
6. Taskforce Member - lorne
7. Taskforce Member - HPE
8. Kira Follower - black
9. Kira Follower - kokichi
10. Kira - kawaii
im mad at myself for not putting HPE there instead of black
And do you have anIn post 624, Gimli wrote:yeah you're weird about kawaiiIn post 623, HighPrincessErinys wrote:
What makes you suddenly think me a follower? Because this one won't vote Kawaii with you?
There wasIn post 755, Vanderscamp wrote:Because I don't think HPE's post makes any sense at all, you could basically sub in any name for yours and the post would be exactly the same. The only place HPE talks about you specifically is mentioning that you have been scummy.
In post 675, Enchant wrote:Save The Dragons(1): Malakittens
Lorne Malvo(1): Black
Save The Dragons(1): KawaiiKame
going to get back to you on this both because this one needs to reread a bit it thinks and because it is not feeling very wellIn post 787, KawaiiKame wrote:Who do you feel is the most likely to be the phony seen as town?In post 667, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Noteworthy that PoE here can easily be disrupted by someone who's already been eliminated from the equation being a big fat phony.
update: this one thinks it has food poisoning or gastroenteritis or something. splendid.In post 788, HighPrincessErinys wrote:going to get back to you on this both because this one needs to reread a bit it thinks and because it is not feeling very wellIn post 787, KawaiiKame wrote:Who do you feel is the most likely to be the phony seen as town?In post 667, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Noteworthy that PoE here can easily be disrupted by someone who's already been eliminated from the equation being a big fat phony.
Perhaps a good idea. We'll see.In post 1141, Gimli wrote: Don't read my ISO with food poisoning
Y'know, this one could just... be town? Have you thought about that?In post 1228, KawaiiKame wrote:HPE's playstyleIn post 1226, KawaiiKame wrote: Does anyone think HPE is Kira?fits perfectlywith how I see Kira playing...
I felt HPE felt too town to be Kira, this makes me anxious...
Why? Kira plays insanely town, think back to,
"Kira will play the best town game"
At this point this one is 100% confident that Gimli/Kawaii are not Follower/Kira or Assistant/Detective together because there is no way in hell an informed Gimli would push and attempt to flip the guy he's supposed to protect so hard and so persistently. The inverse, maybe??, but not Follower/Assistant Gimli, absolutely not.In post 1262, Save The Dragons wrote: I'm okay with recent mala content though it's not amazing by any means
I thought gimli/kawaii was a possibility but maybe not? Maybe this is a distancing hail Mary though.
Thinking.
YouIn post 1305, Gimli wrote: pedit: why is mala town by default?
What motivated you to comically wagonhop and change reads multiple times in such a short span of time? Furthermore what is compelling you to do the same here and now with Kawaii/Mala? And don't say compromise wagon because that feels like a weak excuse for some rather erratic play considering how much you seemed to be townreading Kawaii. A compromise wagon on someone you very actively strongly townread is just weird as hell to me.
VOTE: MalakittensIn post 1353, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Gimli ISO read done, going to ctrl+f Mala in StD's now and then cast my vote from there probably.
Feels towny rn but needs an ISO reread of their own. Probably going to do that and then disappear for my previously mentioned whimsical activities.In post 1365, Black wrote: HPE what is your read on Meg?
Gonna be real with you it's just kinda vibes and also their opening post which as Gimli pointed out is very likely not a post that Kira would make imo. This should come as exactly why this one needs to go and do a proper ISO to get more than "uhh... feels town :)"In post 1368, Black wrote: Without ISOing her first can you tell me why she feels townie?
No lim is honestly not the worst as Azu's said before considering it flips someone who is definitely town.In post 1385, KawaiiKame wrote:It looks like this is going to happen...In post 287, MegAzumarill wrote: We are on evens, I'm partial to a day 1 no lim here tbh.
Black and Vanderscamp are my main townreads rn, with Kokichi being a lesser lean. Lorne this one previously called just a goofball townie but it's pretty sure he could be a goofball scummie too, so. That's just what he is regardless of alignment it thinks. A goofball.In post 1386, KawaiiKame wrote:I'm reading Azu's IS0, I'm getting the same town feeling as you, who else is town to you HPE?In post 1384, HighPrincessErinys wrote: ISO read done. Azu still feels VERY towny honestly. Don't super agree with some of her earlier posts but they're not really scummy and beyond that she gets very towny and stays that way.
Are you asking about the first or second part of the question?In post 1442, KawaiiKame wrote:As in eliminating them?In post 1363, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Like holy shit if we can remove a person or two from the equation entirely that would be splendid. Not to mention Detective getting to brainstorm which has a (assuming no shenanigans) 3 in 4 chance of catching a badman.
This one's said before that a night phase would probably help a lot, so its hoping we can end a bit sooner rather than hit deadline.In post 1450, KawaiiKame wrote:Do you want to continue until the deadline/eliminate someone b4?In post 1422, HighPrincessErinys wrote: It is kind of unreal how we still have 2 RL days before the gameday ends by deadline.
Very little changes with this slot then, hmm?