[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 14166124 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Shell Game (Day 4) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #154 (isolation #2) » Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:04 pm
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
In post 146, Oblivion wrote:
To those who have expressed town reads on it, can it ask for a deeper look into the why behind those sentiments from each of you, for the purpose of its mental models?
For CSF, can you explain which of the questions it asked gave that reaction and why?
your questions feel like you're trying to probe but are latching onto the wrong things in a way that feels +scum. It's mostly gut but I'll try to articulate-
Sunflower in post 13 struck me the wrong way as I wasn't expecting that post from fireisredsir, and then they had a lot of filler type posts. They then call me towny and I'm not sure what they are basing that off of either with the 4 posts I had before.
ActionDan's post 86 rubs me the wrong way because I don't agree and don't know how they reached their conclusions. Perhaps they can explain.
It... is a little concerned by this. Ignoring the part about Sunflower, what part of ActionDan's posting was strangely reached to you? This slot is calling the player who scumclaimed as an opening scum, which it thinks doesn't need much explination? Certainly there's ways to end up on either side of that read but explaining?
You appear to be an experienced player, can you explain to it why this read in particular is rubbing you the wrong way for not explaining their conclusions when half of it appears somewhat Face Value to it?
For this one, dunnstral already gave a different read on sunflower, which was 50% of Dan's list.
And like... What's the harm in asking Dan to articulate reasons when the game is this early? Even if the answer may be obvious to you.
It turns out the answer probably wasn't what you expected. What did you make of that btw?
Can you explain why you are taking a hostile/adversarial position to this line of inquery? It has a hard time believing you can't see that your entrance is above the line of suspicious and overtly drawing attention, so it wants to understand what the motivation of your doing this is? What do you aim to accomplish with this tact?
Did you miss posts 28 and 30 in your read through?
Setting that aside though, I don't really agree that the post is hostile
Post
Post #272 (isolation #3) » Mon Apr 29, 2024 5:38 am
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
In post 155, Oblivion wrote:
What confuses it is that you are saying that asking questions towards players to garner their intent is pro-town but call its questioning anti-town, despite it being pretty clear and apparent that it is asking questions to determine how people think and approach the game state. It can't help but wonder if this is because it prefers to ask questions from aggressors to determine their mindset instead of asking questions from those in already defensive positions who have their guard up?
Both town and scum are going to ask questions but you were asking questions that I didn't think town would ask. It wasn't apparent to me that you were trying to grasp how people approach the game, and tbh it's still not, but it's probably more worthwhile for me to just see how you develop reads from here
Post
Post #524 (isolation #11) » Mon Apr 29, 2024 10:31 am
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
In post 485, Sunflower wrote:
people keep being overly eager to paint meta reads off incomplete/inaccurate data with no shame or concern whatsoever and the fact that some of them are doing it as town is annoying
For me, i didnt know the name was dethy (ive never played in one before, as far as i can remember idk!) but i figured out it was like this when dragons said something is obvious and then i looked at the name of the thread for the very first time. sounds extreme but i sorta just accepted it as a hood. thought i was the only one with this role.
I am not the arbiter of why scum would claim Miller after ascetic, only that it does not fit the setup as I see it.
What was your view on the setup when you doubted the miller claim?
I was close to certain we had 4 cops on a cycle of reliabilites plus one scum of some sort (cop inventor or not)
Pedit. I believe I contemporaneously more or less figured out the setup when the Miller was claimed from memory.
Was the bolded a cause and effect, as in my miller claim jolted an "aha!" moment about the hood for you?
This question is more for the other members of the hood, but I also recall ActionDan said there was "0 or 1" scum in the hood. When did that happen in the hood, and does the timing line up with his narrative here? like after he saw my claim, did he continue to push the possibility of 0 scum in the hood?
In post 1145, morph the cat wrote:
You're voting him. Apparently based on the miller thing. Is there more?
Well I think the timeline of events makes it sus unless i am misunderstanding how things went.
I think actiondan was saying CSF before the outing of neighborhood, miller doesn't make sense until dan found out that there is cops. He then went to "that doesn't make sense with the creativity of game, which is weird for him to say imo because that implies understanding the game setup in some deeper way or what cephrir would design. Both seem fishy to me.
I also just think actiondan is the least townie of that whole neighborhood.
This is kinda pinging me even though I'm suspicious of dan as well
Post
Post #1229 (isolation #17) » Mon Apr 29, 2024 7:58 pm
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
In post 1215, Sunflower wrote:
AD i am like a little wary that his signaling to me/townreading to me was strange given his apparent mindset that scum would also be informed.
I'd be interested in hearing from Dan about this but from everything else you've described, I'm not sure scum would be the first one to propose that everyone has the same role
Post
Post #1244 (isolation #18) » Mon Apr 29, 2024 8:15 pm
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
In post 1239, Sunflower wrote:
also we didn't decide it's a dethy we were like "hey this is kinda like dethy". which. it isn't dethy. can we stop pretending it's dethy im so tired
I'm kind of confused. do you not think there's 1 scum in the hood anymore?
In post 1239, Sunflower wrote:
also we didn't decide it's a dethy we were like "hey this is kinda like dethy". which. it isn't dethy. can we stop pretending it's dethy im so tired
I'm kind of confused. do you not think there's 1 scum in the hood anymore?
i didn't ever think it was a for sure thing. i said it was the most elegant. but i am not particularly willing to take it for granted that we can make assumptions here
Post
Post #1251 (isolation #20) » Mon Apr 29, 2024 8:25 pm
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
I know Cephrir gets grouchy when people assumes things like "there must be scum in the hood"
But creating a setup that strongly alludes to dethy (if not explicitly) and also essentially threatening town if they don't eliminate scum within it feels remarkably punishing if there isn't scum, even for him
Does this represent a change of your Oblivion read? If so, elaborate?
Ummm sort of. I think its posts generally feel agenda less. 1013 is a good example where it gives me the overall impression that it's just doing its own thing in figuring things out.
But I'm also having a hard time following its thought processes and reads on players in the game. It might be due to how it approaches the game, e.g. its treatment of the FireBagel slot seemed like an uncharitable scumread to me, but it was actually townreading Firebagel the whole time...? I guess I'm still in a wait-and-see mode. I'm interested what conclusions its drawing from its questions, specifically with Pooky but also more generally.
Post
Post #1505 (isolation #25) » Tue Apr 30, 2024 9:18 am
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
tbh I think Firebagel decided her entrance into this game before she even got her role PM because her account is a play off of Firebringer, who is known for claiming scum every game
But thanks for answering, that seems like a believable thought process at least
In post 1505, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
tbh I think Firebagel decided her entrance into this game before she even got her role PM because her account is a play off of Firebringer, who is known for claiming scum every game
But thanks for answering, that seems like a believable thought process at least
wait, it thought those connections were just jokes based on the name, is the account really actually a joke account trying to mirror firebringer's playersytle?
I don't think she's trying to mimic all of Firebringer's playstyle, just the part where he jokingly claims scum (her account creation was motivated by Firebringer based on her signup post). The rest of her playstyle seems true to her usual self.
Post
Post #1515 (isolation #27) » Tue Apr 30, 2024 9:43 am
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
In post 1256, Sunflower wrote:
i think that town!klick is capable of finding scum!me. he did it very well recently
i think regardless of alignment he knows that he doesn't have reason to think im scum here
the difference is that i think if he's town he would also know that if we're both town there's a decent chance we can find each other. the fact that he doesn't have reason to think im scum would make him doubt. im on the other side here, not fully confident that klick is scum, and that makes me question AD and marci
the way that his reads on AD and marci progressed from hesitancy/uncertainty to full-on confidence isn't supported and just isn't really believable to me coming from town!klick
this is what i mean by calling the play positional.
i think that those reads became solidified out of necessity
and not out of justified reason. and i don't think that's how town!klick plays
Thinking about this some more, why would scum!Klick feel the need to narrow his PoE within the hood down to you?
In post 1505, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
tbh I think Firebagel decided her entrance into this game before she even got her role PM because her account is a play off of Firebringer, who is known for claiming scum every game
But thanks for answering, that seems like a believable thought process at least
wait, it thought those connections were just jokes based on the name, is the account really actually a joke account trying to mirror firebringer's playersytle?
I don't think she's trying to mimic all of Firebringer's playstyle, just the part where he jokingly claims scum (her account creation was motivated by Firebringer based on her signup post). The rest of her playstyle seems true to her usual self.
Yeah, I don't know Firebringer well enough to actually keep it up, but that was definitely the idea.
But what is my 'usual' playstyle? Does Oblivion seem accurate in describing it from what it's seen here?
By "usual" playstyle, I meant that you're not trying to deliberate obfuscate your posting. For the most part you're posting things you would normally post on your main
And hmm, it's right that you're lighthearteded at times and you'll generally say what's on your mind, but I don't think you're "off the cuff." I think Oblivion's thought process was typed up quickly and checks out enough that I think it's real though
In post 1517, Firebagel wrote:
Yeah, I don't know Firebringer well enough to actually keep it up, but that was definitely the idea.
But what is my 'usual' playstyle? Does Oblivion seem accurate in describing it from what it's seen here?
By "usual" playstyle, I meant that you're not trying to deliberate obfuscate your posting. For the most part you're posting things you would normally post on your main
And hmm, it's right that you're lighthearteded at times and you'll generally say what's on your mind, but I don't think you're "off the cuff." I think Oblivion's thought process was typed up quickly and checks out enough that I think it's real though
You realize this doesn't really give me enough to be able to assess your thoughts here.
I personally don't want to kill in my hood today, but d2 on should probably within until we get the scum. If we kill now we don't get the night result.
It's also dangerous if scum kill the recipients of our inventions
In post 1604, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
I don't know quite frankly. Maybe you're surprised by how quickly I was able to figure out who you were? I'm not sure why you would be though.
Well I'm not even sure that you have! You're being vague enough about it. I don't think it's unreasonable that you could guess who I am but I wasn't expecting anyone to do so here so your level of confidence in both that and your read is strange to me.
And I sorta feel like if you're guessing right, this conversation should give you some more doubt on your read.
I think your use of emojis at the end of sentences gives you away. Or do you remember when I read biancospino off of the Activity Overview?
I lose my ability to rearrange hoods if I vote, which will make my wincon of making the alignments of living players in the hoods match really hard to achieve.
I lose my ability to rearrange hoods if I vote, which will make my wincon of making the alignments of living players in the hoods match really hard to achieve.
In post 1872, Dannflor wrote:
also i just have this nagging feeling that one of the people pushing action dan for the timeline inconsistency of the cop/miller thing is scum so why not firebringer
Wasn't that only me and Firebringer? And I admitted that it wasn't a smoking gun.
Post
Post #2191 (isolation #42) » Wed May 01, 2024 3:14 pm
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
I think the cakez slip is fairly suspicious. I like morph's timing argument. And in addition when you review his posts from this recent burst, whenever he quote responds to someone else, he has done so within 5 minutes and typically within 2-3 minutes. So I get the sense that he was refreshing the thread a lot.
The only time he took ~10 mins to respond was to poiky's accusation.
VOTE: Cakez
I also think it was suspect that Brian Skies didn't react to the cakez thing at all. I think he might've been the only player around the time to post but not comment on it, but instead voted firebringer.
Post
Post #2195 (isolation #43) » Wed May 01, 2024 3:20 pm
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
@firebringer, yeah i think that's the more likely scenario
But when I'm scum, there are a lot of times when I don't know how to react to something so I just... Don't lol. Someone once called it "selective." So I guess he could also just be scum in a similar position without Cakez ig. I haven't really found much townie about Brian before this either
Post
Post #2203 (isolation #45) » Wed May 01, 2024 3:23 pm
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
In post 2194, Firebringer wrote:
the whole cakez was too affraid to post thing and was too slow to respond stuff is really really dumb guys.
Like are u listening to urselves on that shit?
Do u all remember even what ur talking about with regards to the question? The question from pooky was about how he knew it was notsci but not read anything. The answer can be as simple as he read 2 pages prior.
IT can be that fucking simple, and yet we have people here taking it like there is a some sort of grand mystery that cakez has to hide from because he got outted.
Fucking dumb as shit.
Hell, i have been hounded for stuff like that where i say "I haven't reaad shit" and actually read a few pages prior and then people focused me down for this "INCONSISTENCY". No its called me exaggerating that i am very not well read on the game so i didn't tell u that i haven't read everything which is true.
I actually thought this initially took, but the one post that he happened to be slow to respond to was that pooky post? Ehhhhh
In post 2241, Spiffeh wrote:
Shello and Goodbye who do you think are the scum on the FB wagon if you're doubting your scum read there?
i really did not like bagels vote
the timing of it was not good. i think that while bagel might be more inclined as both alignments 2 vote for firebringer because interaction, gimmick, it was just gross 2 me. skitter feels the same
- ydra
Sorry you don't have a sense of humor, but I think getting Firepup to join his own wagon was hilarious XD
Post
Post #2330 (isolation #51) » Wed May 01, 2024 5:54 pm
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
In post 2323, Dannflor wrote:
I think both Sunflower and Klick's posts/cases on each other were towny and
I can case that more specifically tomorrow
, but it reminded me of a TvT in a lot of ways because of the specific ways they both basically took personally how the other was going about reading the other. I think sunflower would have reached for other resources if they wanted to "1v1" klick
I'd be interested in hearing this. Reading it earlier, I felt like Sunflower might've started with the conclusion that Klick was scum, because I didn't think he was thinking about what scum!Klick's motive would be.
I do think point 3 has merit
Did you have any thoughts about his vote on me? I don't feel heavily sussed or sussed at all this game, so leaving a vote on me with an insipid explanation seems unlikely to go anywhere
Post
Post #2333 (isolation #52) » Wed May 01, 2024 5:58 pm
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
In post 2325, Dannflor wrote:
they are also making a lot of posts that I think they would think would get scum read if they were scum, but they are posting them anyway
i don't expect this point to be particularly salient to anyone but it is true
If you could quote them in a spoiler? It's easier to digest than relatively abstract statements
In post 2191, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
I also think it was suspect that Brian Skies didn't react to the cakez thing at all. I think he might've been the only player around the time to post but not comment on it, but instead voted firebringer.
The whole thing about timestamps and whatnot has never been something that's been in my repertoire, so I don't know why anyone would be expecting a reaction from me.
As far as I'm concerned, we're lucky to get any Cakez at all considering he should still be on V/LA.
I guess that's plausible bc no one else seemed to think it was interesting
Post
Post #2455 (isolation #54) » Thu May 02, 2024 2:14 am
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
I think Dann came out and wrote that bit on morph bc he didn't like their sunflower push more than anything, I didn't really get the impression he was doing it to get townread
In post 2559, Dannflor wrote:
do you think me being emotionally detached is scum indicative
o shit that's a good post
i do think it's scum indicative but the way dann is going around it kinda makes me think no
can you explain more why you thought it was scum indicative initially and why that's a good post
Well, the way you're replying makes me think you're legit beliving in your own towniness, and
also i just don't think you play around me like that as scum? Of course you might know how to pocket me but whatever
i originally viewed it as scum indicative cause it felt like as town you weren't really trying to hide your emotions so much? it's a bit of just me and my big mindset theory which is slowly crumbling each time i'm wrong, idk, think i'll go back on that read if stuff changes
Gypyx, do you think Dann and Spiffeh would be playing around you specifically this game, given how many other more vocal people are in this list ?
I noticed you used a similar argument with Spiffeh - "Spiffeh is scum because he would say this specific thing to deliberately pocket me in particular" but I'm not sure I buy that you truly believe that.
Post
Post #2573 (isolation #57) » Thu May 02, 2024 7:56 am
Postby Cat Scratch Fever »
In post 2547, Save The Dragons wrote:
The game is a lot if weird discussions that don't really mean much to the people not involved
It's hard to assert myself like I typically can.
I believe this as I feel this way as well
Did you have thoughts on Cakez and the "timing" of his response?
Spoiler:
In post 2191, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
I think the cakez slip is fairly suspicious. I like morph's timing argument. And in addition when you review his posts from this recent burst, whenever he quote responds to someone else, he has done so within 5 minutes and typically within 2-3 minutes. So I get the sense that he was refreshing the thread a lot.
The only time he took ~10 mins to respond was to poiky's accusation.
VOTE: Cakez
I also think it was suspect that Brian Skies didn't react to the cakez thing at all. I think he might've been the only player around the time to post but not comment on it, but instead voted firebringer.