VOTE: sAVE THE DRAGONS save the FROGS instead.
By the way, I'm going to post an enormous WoT soon.
Yes and I will use my survey strategy (the SSS) to supplement the Day 2 RVS. The SSS and Day 2 RVS will go even better than usual because of the extra info we got from D1.
That's a logical fallacy, argument from authority. Even if you're a good scumhunter it's not a good point for why th particular read is right.In post 154, DkKoba wrote:fixed the post for uIn post 148, Frogsterking wrote:All i can understand so far from you is that you want me to reread muffin's iso because there are things in it scum!muffin wouldn't include. These things I'm looking for in Muffin's iso have been described so far as anger, solviness, and sincerity.
a
i have a pretty good grasp of when a person is showing high cognition of analyzing the game, and muffin and dwlee are 2 players who are showing the heavily here.
while dwlee is a good scum player - i see no cheap distancing tricks or anything like that from them and other such things that they have as part of their scum game, and stuff that is mostly prevalent in their town games.
can you describe why you think muffin is scum, which would be more helpful for me to dissect and possibly if you are right i might see it.
If you think NM is scum then this makes me think Malcolm is town and NM is trying to vote buy themIn post 158, Not_Mafia wrote:Also don't get the scumreads on malcolm
I thought you were town telling so hard I got paranoid.In post 227, MalcolmTucker wrote:What initially gave you a mafia vibe and what turned you away from that so quickly?In post 224, Frogsterking wrote:Oh okay yeah now that i took a second look at it i really feel town pings.
Once my levels of paranoia decreased i realized that you're super townie.In post 228, Frogsterking wrote:I thought you were town telling so hard I got paranoid.In post 227, MalcolmTucker wrote:What initially gave you a mafia vibe and what turned you away from that so quickly?In post 224, Frogsterking wrote:Oh okay yeah now that i took a second look at it i really feel town pings.
I see! Are you down to flip NM first with me?In post 233, MalcolmTucker wrote:*Both to be mafia, I mean, re the Galron/NM interaction. One town/one mafia in there I reckon.
Hmm and maybe NM shouldn't even be scumread, they should be townread!In post 237, MalcolmTucker wrote:Unsure at this point, Galron gives me a stronger mafia read at this point than NM and I'm very wary of getting an immediate bandwagon going too early given out last turn and what happened there. Need to be careful this time.In post 234, Frogsterking wrote:I see! Are you down to flip NM first with me?In post 233, MalcolmTucker wrote:*Both to be mafia, I mean, re the Galron/NM interaction. One town/one mafia in there I reckon.
In post 239, MalcolmTucker wrote:Like I say, I'm keen on the view one of NM/Galron is mafia. But if one turns up red the other is green for me.
In post 240, Galron wrote:I think the case has been cracked.
So you don't have a problem wagoning NM?In post 242, Galron wrote:I think you're increasingly scummy actually.
In post 242, Galron wrote:I think you're increasingly scummy actually.
Also..are you experiencing townie paranoia?In post 243, Frogsterking wrote:So you don't have a problem wagoning NM?In post 242, Galron wrote:I think you're increasingly scummy actually.
I mean I still have to guess to some extent based on what you've said.In post 275, DkKoba wrote:do people just not read anything I say or..
The answer is that you don't know what townie paranoia is because you're not a townie.In post 317, Galron wrote:Thank you, Dwlee.In post 246, Galron wrote:In post 243, Frogsterking wrote:So you don't have a problem wagoning NM?In post 242, Galron wrote:I think you're increasingly scummy actually.I need to understand what you're asking because neither of these posts appear to have anything to do with what I posted other than physical proximity.In post 244, Frogsterking wrote:In post 242, Galron wrote:I think you're increasingly scummy actually.Also..are you experiencing townie paranoia?In post 243, Frogsterking wrote:So you don't have a problem wagoning NM?In post 242, Galron wrote:I think you're increasingly scummy actually.
Are you going to continue to disregard this question, Frogster?
It's an actual fallacy, the all-or-nothing fallacy or something like that.In post 330, Galron wrote:What's wrong with the logic?
You could probably post a reads listIn post 333, The Muffin Man wrote:What else needs to be discussedIn post 313, DkKoba wrote:thats E-1, please someoen unvote so we can maintain discussion time for now
In post 338, Galron wrote:Why him and not me?In post 334, Frogsterking wrote:You could probably post a reads listIn post 333, The Muffin Man wrote:What else needs to be discussedIn post 313, DkKoba wrote:thats E-1, please someoen unvote so we can maintain discussion time for now
Let's see one then!In post 344, Galron wrote:And you continue to pretend I don't exist.
I think Galron's reaction to being voted is at best null. I think it's a little scummy in actuality. I think Galron tried to plant fake associatives with their votes and there isn't the townie indignation response.In post 349, DkKoba wrote:Can you quantify how?In post 343, Frogsterking wrote:Yeah Galron seems scummy still to me in their recent posting
I think this is Galron's scum game.In post 351, DkKoba wrote:Is this how you think Galron plays town/scum or how you think everyone plays town/scumIn post 331, Frogsterking wrote:Galron didn't move his stance on NM off of waffle mode when prompted and didn't understand what I meant about townies being paranoid (due to lack of TMI). Now Galron is reacting by asking me a lot of stall questions which I read as a scum tell.
I thought it may have been in order of most recent activity with Galrom and NM moved to the bottom.In post 361, DkKoba wrote:That reads list was probably put into random.orgIn post 359, Frogsterking wrote:Galron is now also the 2nd FoS of NM
Who then?In post 404, Dwlee99 wrote:Well no but okay I guess