Open 59 - Daytalk 12! (Game Over) before 545

[Phate]

Oh. This game. Right.

[Phate]

Vote: kabenon

[Phate]

Vote: Adel

[Phate]

The walls-o-text were extremely informative, both to the current game and to mafia theory in general.

Vote: Vollkan

JDodge's line of questioning is simple, direct, and hard to dodge without it being obvious. Vollkan has continued to dodge JDodge's questions and to reduce them to questions of pure theory rather than discuss them as they relate to the game at hand. I predicted as I read the last page the "Well, I concede the argument, let's be friends" ending that vollkan made on the beginning of this page. From what little I know of vollkan and from what I can percieve of his play this game, such a compromise and manner of reacting to questions = scummy enough for a vote.

[Phate]

Apologies.

Unvote
Vote: Vollkan

[Phate]

Mizzy, I don't think your vote is justified. Adel's play is different than others she's played in, but that doesn't make her scum - have you ever seen her play like this in a game where she was scum? If so, please cite it.

It's not helpful, by any means. I realize that unhelpful != scum, but she did help kill a townie D1, and I have my eye on her and JDodge who have seemed to pair up together quite nicely.

Do I have to explain to you why these reasons suck?

What do you mean by "her and JDodge who have seemed to pair up together quite nicely"?

[Phate]

Or you reserve opinion.

"Taking a stand that is not accusatory" != "Defending".

If you continue to believe as you do, then I demand that right now, in your next post, you accurately tell who's scum and who's town. It will be noted later who you were blatantly defending and who you were vehemently accusing.

[Phate]

No, she didn't. She pointed something out to see your reaction.

Also, you failed to tell who's scum and who's town. You must be scum trying to hide your buddies.

Vote: kabenon

I'm really not liking your recent play, kab. I voted you yesterday because I thought you were likely scum, and I'm more sure today than I was yesterday.

Note: I've still got my eye on you, Vollkan.

[Phate]

unvote
Vote: kabenon

Fixed.

[Phate]

And 5) As fast as he can, he tries to divert attention to Mizzy, who's also noticed his scumminess.

[Phate]

Guardian, I like the idea of being able to communicate privately. That's why I signed up for daytalk. Keeping public records of daytalking kind of defeats the purpose of daytalk.

I still feel strongly that kabenon is scum.

[Phate]

Your exchange with vollkan strikes me as scummy. Specifically, you seem to be making attacks which, when disproved, you try to downplay. The way you switched focus to Mizzy halfway through also strikes me as scummy.

I also really don't like this series of posts, all in a row:

Vollkan, you should come over to the xyzzy wagon and maybe we can get something going or something. I'd random bandwagon someone at this point to get some conversation going.

Pushing an xyzzylynch.

Come on xyzzy, if you really are town, say something, so we can have some sort of argument and have somebody slip up and then lynched! Yay!

Something to point to later if you're blamed for xyzzy's lynch.

I don't think a hammer is necessary, but a -2 might encourage some discussion.

Still pushing the xyzzy wagon.

unvote. I wanted to get participation, not a quick lynch.

Hopping off the wagon when a lynch draws near. This wouldn't be

that

damning if not for your next few posts.

There hasn't been enough information really to find a meritorious bandwagon. So, by bandwagonning randomly, I hoped to get information. But the wagon grew all too quickly, which I suppose is information in and of itself.

Holding onto the sanctimonious "I wash my hands of this" attitude, and preparing to blame others for the xyzzy wagon.

I don't think a hammer is necessary, but a -2 might encourage some discussion.

Prodding the wagon along from the safety of the Not Voting area.

I was kinda hoping that votes for a certain person would cause an increase in participation, but it seems that this did not work. If you, vollkan, saw no justification, then why vote for him in the first place?

Setting up a possible target on D2 after xyzzy is lynched. Incidentally, who did kab go after now immediately on D2? Coincidence?

Why do you think otherwise?

'Cuz he's scum and doesn't want to die.

And then right here, you're encouraging an xyzzy lynch again; perhaps worried the lynch won't go through and having to prod it. Doesn't fit with your last two posts.

I really can't see kabtown making that series of posts.

[Phate]

In the interim, I talked to a few people. One agreed, but not strongly; one thought I was overreacting. I'll reveal their identities if I need to.

Then, I got caught up in the JDodge-Adel-Vollkan scumclaiming debate, and watched that for awhile. Once it quieted down, I reread, and came to the conclusion that I still thought kab was scum.

[Phate]

Right when I return, and night falls. On the plus side, we can talk at night too, so any discussion that need be had can happen privately.

Vote: No Lynch

[Phate]

Oh.

[Phate]

By "we" I meant all of us. I haven't been talking at night - I actually haven't been talking much at all. I talked to Mizzy a little bit at the beginning and I think I talked to Incognito once, and I just shot off a PM to Xtoxm. Otherwise, I haven't talked to anyone.

Oh, and Guardian prodded me once.

[Phate]

Mizzy, are you thinking of Triumvirate mafia, when I WAS recently lynched?

as a townie, for active lurking...

Removed the size tags on the last sentence. Don't do it again. - Mod

[Phate]

Oh, sorry. Didn't see the rule. I put that in small text because I was grumbling about the outcome of another game, and it wasn't terribly relevant to the matter at hand.

[Phate]

Hi, Adel.

[Phate]

Wait a second, we're at lylo, aren't we?

Vote: Adel

What's the case against me again?