Ok, here's my answers to Spinach's case.
Spinach wrote:Claramata, the former Tarballs, makes an oddly worded response and then disappears. Scum points for Tarballs.
I can't defend someone else's actions, but since we're in the same player slot, that's a somewhat understandable accusation.
Tarballs responds to questions. It is
VERY
odd Tarballs would even think of saying someone is town right off of the bat, and then says nobody stands out, and a contradiction on top of it.
I didn't say that someone is town. I said that Locke always seems pro-town, so it doesn't stand out to me that he appears pro-town in this game as well.
He then asks for clarifacation on a fairly obvious comment. Yay for filler text? >_> + scum points for Tarballs.
It wasn't that obvious to me. It's not mentioned anywhere that Locke and Henrz are my
neighbors
- just that I can daytalk with them. Also, it seemed odd that Locke asked my opinion about just him and Henrz, instead of everyone.
Tarballs explains his earlier contradiction, but still, acting pro-town and being town
are practically the same thing
I disagree.
Then Tarballs makes a flawed vote on hernz. Please look at the bolded parts, woot contradictions, + Scum points for reasons explained.
Ok, let's see now. This is what I said, bolded parts by Spinach, red- and orange-colored parts by me:
However! Making a random vote, and not just any vote but a selfvote, 4 pages into the game
doesn't help us progress, so therefore he is obviously stalling the game on purpose
.
On the other hand
,
this will cause people to vote him for that anti-town play,
which quite possibly will help us leave the RVS behind
. He wants us to vote him, so that's exactly what I'm going to do
If you're able to understand the red-colored part, you'll clearly see that there is no contradiction in there.
Um, no, you didn't see it like that. You said Hernz was stalling and doesn't help us progress. Infact, this whole post contradicts with his last post. He then points out a contradiction with Monkey and votes him. + Scum points for Tarballs. He's the king of contradictions by now...
See the answer above. And you clearly didn't understand why I really voted for Henrz. Reasonings for my vote are in orange color.
Tarball's first post on D2, indicating that monkey is suddenly town because he hammers, meaning he is out of suspects.
Can't understand how you got that impression. I even said that I'm "still keeping my eye on him", so how am I indicating that Monkey has to be town?
I make a post agaist tarballs, but suddenly, he cares about my post! But not about LL's, or Fluffy. And the fact that you weren't killed DOES prove something here, and asking how I know what a silencer does is like asking how I know what a doctor does. It's pretty self-explanatory. He then thinks I knew a silencer existed before starbuck flipped.. yet fails to bring up any evidance from D1. To me, it seems like Tarballs, the scum, was out of targets and decided to pick up on me for flawed reasons. + scum points for Tarballs.
You made a scummy comment about the scum nightkill, trying to make me look like scum because Droideka was killed instead of me. And I didn't like that talk about Mafia Silencer either. Those two things really jumped out from your post, that's why you got my attention.
Oh, so Tarballs has something to hide? Interesting. + scum points for Tarballs.
Do I even need to answer this?
Tarballs shows that he wants me lynched fast, very scummy.
Once again, I fail to see where you got that impression from.
He then points out that bandwagoning isn't bad, also scummy.
What I said was that bandwagoning isn't
automatically
a bad thing. And I fail to see what is scummy about that.
He then hints that the reaming scum may have a role. Interesting...
I'd be surprised if there were
any
players here without a role.
This post just confuses me. The last part. . .It's directed at me, right?
It's a bit late to answer this now, but: It was directed to everyone, also including you.
Wondering why Tarballs is asking what makes him town.. that doesn't make sense for a townie to ask.
So you'd rather have a person saying "This person is town, that person is town, they are town, those are town too, that there is scum, but I won't say why" around, then? No matter what you think people's alignment is, you should give reasons
why
you think they are town/scum. Otherwise I will assume that you somehow
know
they are town/scum, which kinda makes you scum.