GOGO POLICY!
@Ani: What the hell is a
Plus I've seen Andrius use Calc before.animorpherv1 wrote:
EDITX2: Andrius and Nachomamma8 are using the Account Calcifier.
2 THINGS FOR CALC:Calcifer wrote:Actually, Kat. Don't prove us wrong. Let us prove your wrong. Here's a COMPLETE list of completed games you were in:
Newbie 955 Kat was town. Opened up the RVS with some generic SE stuff, then votes someone for not participating in the RVS.
DNA Evidence Kat was town. Defended himaself first, then voted DJ for a creepy avatar.
Newbie 949 Kat was town. Voted for the Mod.
Prison Mafia Kat was town, replaced in. Jokingly suggests a policy lynch of IH.
Mafia War Kat was town. Votes mod again.
So nope, no policy votes there.
More role-speculation please.jimfinn wrote:Let us assume for for the sake of negation that Katsuki is truly Mario and is a town-aligned role. The role of Mario in this game would likely be a PR. Any person with any knowledge of the flavor ought to assume that. Therefore, to claim Mario without full-claiming would likely draw a NK, which would cause the death of one of the town's PRs. Therefore, no pro-town player with any common sense would possibly perform such an action. Katsuki is most likely scum, and even if town, a better policy lynch than DMSIS because Kat has already performed a blatantly anti-town action.
Funny. No one policy votes in a newbie game because you are playing with newbies and hence setting an example.Calcifer wrote:Why is this? In Newbie games, people actually play smart, and they don't tend to do things they know are blatantly anti-town. You know, like policy-voting?Katsuki wrote:1. INCLUDING NEWBIE GAMES AS PROOF FOR "LACK OF POLICY VOTES" IS LAUGHABLE.
If around the same time = span over a month, then sure. I have been making policy votes on shotty for a month now. You are trying to turn an irrelevant thing into a scum tell, when it would be a WIFOM or a null-tell AT BEST.Calcifer wrote:THIS DOESN'T HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING. YOU MADE A BUNCH OF POLICY VOTES ON SHOTTY AROUND THE SAME TIME. IT'S SAFE TO ASSUME YOU'RE COVERING FOR YOUR SCUM GAME IN ONE OF THEM.Katsuki wrote:2. YOUR ORIGINAL POINT WAS WITH ME POLICY VOTING SHOTTY, AND THE FACT THAT I "NEVER" POLICY VOTE. YET, SHOTTY IS ONLY IN ONE OF THOSE GAMES, AND THAT WAS MY FIRST TIME PLAYING WITH HIM TOO.
Tunnel more. Already tunneling on the fact that I am supposedly a fake Mario. Trying to lynch me quick before town changes their mind on me huh.Calcifer wrote:Nope. Blatantly anti-town. Hell, I'd even call it scummy. You could've drawn a counterclaim from the REAL Mario, who might be our doctor, cop, vig etc, and out him for the scum to pick off. If you don't call THAT blatantly anti-town, then I honestly don't know what is.Katsuki wrote:Responding to jim last post, soft-claiming being completely pro-town? Not really. Blatently anti-town? Definately not.
Nope, my case is that you guys have yet to present any case on me other than a "OMG KAT POLICY VOTE, MUST BE SCUM" and a "KAT IS NOT MARIO LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH".Calcifer wrote:So... your case on us is that we're attacking you...?Katsuki wrote: Calcifer: Still probably scum, terrible case and so called evidence re: "Kat 'never' policy votes". Gandalf has already stated in this thread that that is not true. Still has yet to explain how that is "kat-is-scum" evidence too, just constantly flings around "kat is scum".
...
Good, I'm glad that you agree with lynching you today. Have a nice day.Calcifer wrote:Nice try, scum. But we're not settling for anything less than a Day 1 scum lynch.Katsuki wrote:If anything, I would be willing to put my neck in the noose D2 if we lynch Calc today.
So your last few posts have been the same thing. Is there anything you'd like to add?gandalf5166 wrote:Yeah, Kat is definitely scum. Flailing scum at that.
By that logic, gandalf would be scum too, as he policy votes shotty too.Calcifer wrote:How is it irrelevant? Policy lynches are EXTREMELY easy for scum to hid behind and consistantly hurt the town. That's not WIFOM, that's not a null-tell.Kat wrote:If around the same time = span over a month, then sure. I have been making policy votes on shotty for a month now. You are trying to turn an irrelevant thing into a scum tell, when it would be a WIFOM or a null-tell AT BEST.
I'M TALKING ABOUT YOU FUCKING SOFT-CLAIMING LUIGI.mallowgeno wrote:SLIP! If you were a mason with him, you would know who Luigi is!Katsuki wrote: I would rather Calc lynch, but I hope that was not a soft-claim for Luigi.
unvote, vote Katsuki