Mafia 75: Return of the Mafia! TOWN WINS (really late)
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Okay, I realize I have made a poor replacement so far, as I've not talked much more then my predecessor, but I'm having a hell of a time catching up and keeping up at the same time.
From what I have so far, TS wagon makes little sense to me, I agree with BM about WhoMe?, who seems to be acting opportunistically, and Matt_s who confuses me as he seems to post nothing even when he posts. Also, there seems to be a lot of noise lately inflating the size of this thread, and I'm not sure if it's a BM playstyle, or something to think about
I'm going to work on my back reading while participating in the current discussion unless that starts to become counter-productive. I will have a better chance at night phase to do a catchup undistracted. Ive also died in another game, so I have that time free'd up too.
Also, dahill's "I don't need to defend, I'm lazy, not scummy" defense is ew.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
dahill1 wrote:
when did i say i dont need a defense?Surye wrote:Also, dahill's "I don't need to defend, I'm lazy, not scummy" defense is ew.
Did I miss understand that?dahill1 wrote:
against being lazy in general? not reallyMatt_S wrote:
Do you still have no defense? Just curious.dahill1 wrote:
woo someone else who finds Imat scummyarmlx wrote:I am up for a lynch of any of the 4 people I listed as scummy, however I want to wait for Imat to return before proceeding.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
I meant that there seems to be a lot of irrelevent posting coming from you, but I was joking, hence the .Battle Mage wrote:
i dont understand what this bit means....Surye wrote:Also, there seems to be a lot of noise lately inflating the size of this thread, and I'm not sure if it's a BM playstyle, or something to think about
Also, as far as activity goes, i'm expecting great things of you. What did you make of Matt's analysis of Dahill and my subsequent comments?
BM
Can you link me to the analysis you specificly are talking about? This game is sort of bluring to me, and I'm still getting a handle on where the posts are, remember, to me it feels like 100 pages in about a realtime week-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
See, this is what I get for trying to participate in the game without finishing my read through. Matt_S presents a strong case against dahill1, and is acting very protown, as he's not even trying to setup dahill1 for a lynch, just showing how useless he has been.
Tonight when I get home I will address specifics in the analysis, and add a bit more I saw, and I saw since (Can't make real substantial posts from here )-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Yea, you shouldn't. I'm saying you presented a solid case on Dahill's ineffectualness in this game, without trying to setup a target to lynch (necissarily).Matt_S wrote:
I feel mildly insulted.Surye wrote:Matt_S presents a strong case against dahill1, and is acting very protown, as he's not even trying to setup dahill1 for a lynch, just showing how useless he has been.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
The lack of a vote to me seemed like it made for genuine case for analysis v.s. setting up a case for a lynch. And that is how the whole post felt to me.Battle Mage wrote:
EBWOP: I see you found it.Surye wrote:See, this is what I get for trying to participate in the game without finishing my read through. Matt_S presents a strong case against dahill1, and is acting very protown, as he's not even trying to setup dahill1 for a lynch, just showing how useless he has been.
Tonight when I get home I will address specifics in the analysis, and add a bit more I saw, and I saw since (Can't make real substantial posts from here )
Your view is interesting, as i felt it gave the opposite read on Matt. He clearly made the analysis with the intention of making Dahill look bad. Thats not a criticism as such-just a fact. Yet, surprisingly, he didnt follow up with a vote, despite his own admission that the case was solid.
BM
Now, whether that is a good thing or not is a good question, leaves a lot of room for wiggle. But honestly his analysis felt town, and it seemed on the mark. Dahill is looking like #1 for me right now.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Why are you provoking BM for no reason? This will only lead to more nonsense posts. His request was not out of line, if anyone has some input before a hammer, more power to them.Xtoxm wrote:
Ohh you're just asking for it.Battle Mage wrote:Ok, Dahill is at -2 if Armlx's count is right. I'll be here to drop the hammer tomorrow. DO NOT HAMMER BEFORE I GET THE CHANCE TO POST.
If you do, you will join my Black List, and i'll make it my sole ambition to see you hang.
Thanks,
BM-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
I don't really like this subtle defense, it seems like he's trying to sway town with his resignation. If you are town, try to stay alive and scumhunt with us. There are very few roles in the game in which it is adventagous to lie down and die, and even fewer situations for a town. The only reason I could see scum doing it is to bus himself, which is ridiculous.WhoMe? wrote:I think I am likely to be lynched today because I seem to be appearing in a lot of scum lists. This is because I haven't been playing very well this game, having lost a lot of patience during the whole BM rolegate affair.
And as I make such a very good target, I am suspicious of TSN for saying he would like mw lynched, but not voting me. I have to think he doesn't want to be involved in what he knows will be a mislynch, how does he know? I think he's scum.
So, your style of defense seems to me to be trying to prevent your lynch, but doing so in a way that misleads the town.
Vote: WhoMe?-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
I'm not sure if it's scummy or not, but it's sure not helpful. He seems to be very evasive. I'm feeling more like WhoMe? is the right choice for today. I don't like how armlx says he doesn't want a WhoMe? lynch right now, but he's still voting on him.curiouskarmadog wrote:so wait a minute..is a a read through pointless or not? Why did you state you were going to read through?
how does no one else not see this guy as scummy?!?
armlx: What makes today bad for an WhoMe? lynch, but still makes him lynch worthy.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
I don't know. I really don't see scum being so ballsy as to fake some information about buddies, and say they are town.armlx wrote:
I realize, but do you think Matt_S is lying?Surye wrote:And Matt_S is also pushing a Peers/Celeb lynch. Just saying. there's no vote from me, because I'm just thinking out loud.
But the case against Celeb is weak is my point.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
This is the reason I answered the way I did. My original respose said that he was probably town for it, then I realized it would be wasy and pretty risk free to fake it and call out some townies. Meaning skitzer is probably town. But I'm not ready to take that for granted.armlx wrote:
I like this response, but what are your thoughts on Matt_S as scum faking results about random townies?Surye wrote:
I don't know. I really don't see scum being so ballsy as to fake some information about buddies, and say they are town.armlx wrote:
I realize, but do you think Matt_S is lying?Surye wrote:And Matt_S is also pushing a Peers/Celeb lynch. Just saying. there's no vote from me, because I'm just thinking out loud.
But the case against Celeb is weak is my point.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Bingo, and my posting record should be proof of that, I'm catching up now, and I was hedging any rash moves while I was doing so. I needed to see L-2 to claim, for some reason I thought it wasn't. Anyways, carry on, will post thoughts as I catch up.curiouskarmadog wrote:not really following the game? There was a count on the last page...what did you need to see before you thought he should claim?-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Wait, what? I see words, but no meaning. What are you even saying here? You want Celeb to fakeclaim? Townie is townie, there's no "claim better". I put him at L-1 in anticipation of the hammer. Now do it.Korlash wrote:Oh alsoFoS: Suryefor putting bloki at L-1 after I said I would hammer even though he shold be forced to claim better... >.> *gumbles something about impatience*-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
From out of the shadows, I call BS. Sure they could have brought you up to speed, maybe they did. You can still feign ignorance. WIFOM and all that.Toaster Strudel wrote:
I'm too lazy to search for mason in a 142 page game. If I was scum, my buddies might bring me up to speed at night... but hey, you've already made up your mind.Tarhalindur wrote:And I say you're scum because you're intentionally outing town power roles.
And I have been following this game, haven't had to much to post, but I've kept my head above water. I don't see Matt_s and crew as likely scum at all, the risk would be too huge for an absolutly game losing play. If any one of them gets lynched or vigged, the entire team would go down. Nope, they are not scum.
TS on the other hand is being pretty irrational, and even worse, is playing that dance where you cast large amounts of doubt, see if anyone bites, and if no one does, saying "I never said they were scum!". You were pretty clearly setting up Matt_s as scum, and as I stated, I believe this is most definitely false. And it's not because you are wrong that I am about to vote you, but because when no one agreed, you act as if that was not your intent at all.
Vote: TS-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
You're right. You have nothing.Korlash wrote:So.. What to do what to do... On one hand I want to vote Surye... But on the other hand I have nothing... So... I don't know why I'm even weighing my options...
Vote: Surye
If they were not all scum, or not all masons, I think one of them could safely claim not-mason-with-matt_s, without risking overclaiming. However, this has not happened. I wonder why...Korlash wrote:
Aside from post 3551, has Matt, Skitzer, or Kscope actually came out and claimed? Being the VI I proabbly missed it, or misread it into some sort of order for soup.Surye wrote:And I have been following this game, haven't had to much to post, but I've kept my head above water. I don't see Matt_s and crew as likely scum at all, the risk would be too huge for an absolutly game losing play. If any one of them gets lynched or vigged, the entire team would go down. Nope, they are not scum.
See they don't all have to be scum. The beauty of being scum is if only one survives, they can still win. So, hypothetically, if matt is scum and calls two town town. He effectivly confirms himself in our eyes should one or both of them die, while systematically dragging one or both with him should he die. So the trio does not all have to be scum. Saying they are all confirmed town simply because they cannot all be scum seems stupid until we have some other form of confirmation.
I am participating in the game and provided reasons for my participation in the wagon. There's nothing out of the blue about it. And yes that's what you do, and now I'm throwing TS in that pot, with support.Korlash wrote:
What? You come out of the blue and hop on the growing bandwagon with this... Large amount of doubt? Isn't that how scum are outed? You see something you disagree with or think is suspicious, and throw it into the discussion pot.Surye wrote:TS on the other hand is being pretty irrational, and even worse, is playing that dance where you cast large amounts of doubt, see if anyone bites, and if no one does, saying "I never said they were scum!". You were pretty clearly setting up Matt_s as scum, and as I stated, I believe this is most definitely false. And it's not because you are wrong that I am about to vote you, but because when no one agreed, you act as if that was not your intent at all.
You're agreeing with me, then spouting some non-sense I addressed ealierKorlash wrote: Now I admit the "I'm not saying he is scum" isn't the most pro-town thing TS has ever muttered, but I can't see how it is an overly scummy thing either. Questioning why a claimed power role (or semi-claimed, or partly claimed, or whatever the hell he is) is still alive and a vanilla town was killed instead is a very viable argument. Have we been treating matt as anything less of a claimed town? In fact, if him skitzer and Kscope are all town, then why are the mafia not systematically killing them off? They choose to let three town live that can potentially confirm each other live while they kill off vanilla townies thus making the list of names to hide in that much smaller? And theres no WIFOM involved. You have a claimed vig sitting over there that is the best choice for doc protection, the scum have no fear of their kills being stopped if they choose between the three "masons" now do they?
It says nothing of my confidence (which incidentally, IS high), but rather to assure her that I am not voting against her because I think her opinions are wrong, but that I think they way she played them out was scummy. No where in there did I say I think she is wrong (infact, I said that my post was NOT about that).Korlash wrote: And lastly, "it is not becuase you are wrong." you seem pretty confident about that Slappy. are you saying you know that Matt and his gang are who they say they are?-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Repeating the same point 6 times doesn't make six points. Sorry.Korlash wrote:I think out of the... 4...6.. however many points I brought up towards you, you responded to maybe one... ONE...
I can get the avoiding, but I at least thought you could come up with some form of defense other then... "Uh... No I wasn't!"
hypocrite... *eats candy* Ohh strawberry! <3-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
"Slip of the tongue" seems to be your current theme, so lets take care of this now. There was no slip of the tongue. Not ever, I never denied anything. I clearly laid out my reasoning as to assert the more then likely situation with Matt_s and skitzer and kscope. I clearly stated why I thought this pointed matt_s, as well as the other two as being town. I have never changed this story, and I'll even quote it again for you.Korlash wrote:Your slip of the tongue where you admitted knowing more then you should about Matt and his gang, then your denial of this and assertion that your post claimed the opposite. (1.2ish)
AndSurye wrote:I don't see Matt_s and crew as likely scum at all, the risk would be too huge for an absolutly game losing play. If any one of them gets lynched or vigged, the entire team would go down. Nope, they are not scum.
There is no slip, and no denial here... If you're talking about when I said:Surye wrote:If they were not all scum, or not all masons, I think one of them could safely claim not-mason-with-matt_s, without risking overclaiming. However, this has not happened. I wonder why...
Your reading of this intentionally distorts my meaning. I am clearly stating that I am voting because of her intent, not her opinion. And in the sea of quotes when you quoted me, you left out this quote, and opted to paraphrase it, even though it seems so important to you. Imagine that.Surye wrote:And it's not because you are wrong that I am about to vote you, but because when no one agreed, you act as if that was not your intent at all.
You never made this point before, but I'll address it here anyways and give you the .9, since I'm such a nice guy. That's fine, you can follow any lead you want, however, I have clearly stated why I find her intent scummy, attempting to lead the charge against a highly likely town, and backing down so easily when no one listened to her.Korlash wrote: Your hoping on the TS wagon by proclaiming that attacking matt in whatever way she did made her scum, when quite frankly had I been paying attention I would have done the exact same thing as her. A claim does not mean town. (.9)
Two points for this non-point? That's not fair. I can only respond with.. I obviously think they are more town then TS.. and for the reasons I posted in the "whole paragraph"? I mean, what more can I say.Korlash wrote: The fact that neither of the three people you made a whole paragraph proving they were "not scum" are in fact, not in the least bit any more town then TS herself. And the avoidance of this issue while trying to implicate me as the bad guy. (2)
I'm not making you look like the bad guy, you're the one calling me namesKorlash wrote: Your continued avoidance of the real point in 3587, plus the continued defense of trying to make me look like the bad guy. (.6)
So this is the same point again as the last one. What did I tell you about that?Korlash wrote: And of course your last post where once again you intentionally alter facts to make me look bad. so (+.4) for that...-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Oh, this is the post you were talking about. Of course I can condemn one person based on another's claim, even if it's a soft claim. That's the name of the game, use information to find scum! Matt_s has softclaimed, whether you can see it or not is your call, but given that, and TS's reaction, sure, I think that's kinda the point of the game. She didn't out a power role, I never said that, someone else did. The power role was already way out there. If it was not, then why does TS expect Matt_s dead?Korlash wrote:I'm not asking them to claim, I'm telling you your an idiot to condemn one person based on another's claim that they never made. TS outed a power role? Did she? Or did she stop a pre-emptive fake claim?-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
I said it's not because she was wrong. Not. NOT. NOOOOT. I didn't say, "You're wrong, but that's not why I'm voting you", which is how you are incorrectly interpreting it, even though I have cleared this point up over and over, you're just a broken record.Korlash wrote:
I have not distorted your meaning. I fully accept you meant you are voting her for reasons of blah blah blah. I don't give a damn why your voting her. You admit in here, she is wrong. Here... read it:
You still say she is wrong. While you admit it is not worth voting over, the fact you so clearly and confidently knew she was wrong that you were willing to just toss it out there as an afterthought PROVES you know she is wrong about Matt. Meaning you don't just think matt is town, you somehow KNOW he is town and not lying. The only people who can know this is scum, so yeah, get it yet?Surye wrote:And it's not because you are wrongthat I am about to vote you, but because when no one agreed, you act as if that was not your intent at all.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
I'm not too concerned about your opinion of my case after this line of "reasoning" you have used against it.Korlash wrote:
YAY you found it! good for you Scooter! wan't some candy?surye wrote:Oh, this is the post you were talking about. Of course I can condemn one person based on another's claim, even if it's a soft claim. That's the name of the game, use information to find scum! Matt_s has softclaimed, whether you can see it or not is your call, but given that, and TS's reaction, sure, I think that's kinda the point of the game. She didn't out a power role, I never said that, someone else did. The power role was already way out there. If it was not, then why does TS expect Matt_s dead?
The thing about claims is that... you kinda have to make sure they are real. If you just take everyone's claim for their words then the scum just claim bulletproof town that are immune to lynch and investigations. Matt's "claim" is far from confirmed town, so it's the name of the game to poke and prode and raise questions about it's legitamacy yes? So your in a sense, saying TS is scum for acting pro-town. Do you see why I think your case is BS?-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
I stated, VERY CLEARLY, why I thought that such a fake claim would not be one scum would make, for the reasons I VERY CLEARLY stated. I don't take every claim as bulletproof, I apply logic and reason. Both of which I gave to you on a silver platter, it's not my fault you can't follow it.Korlash wrote:If you just take everyone's claim for their words then the scum just claim bulletproof town that are immune to lynch and investigations.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
I'm so busy with you, I have no time for other posts.Korlash wrote:
Also, note how you say this to me, yet you ignore God's last post where he physically tells them to claim.surye wrote:Stop asking them to claim Korlash.
Your holding me to a double standard jerk! *shakes fist* And I will not stand for that! I will sit... In this chair... BUT I WILL NOT STAND! and there is nothing you can do about it... ha.. ha... ha!-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Oh, I read it. It's just that I'd already addressed the issue of my feelings towards a full claim, why repeat it practically on the same page? Not that it much matters at this point.Korlash wrote:
That doesn't seem all that good. Good townies need to take in everyone, not just focus on one person at a time. Thats... well thats bad scum hunting...surye wrote:I'm so busy with you, I have no time for other posts.
I mean it was only one post, what you couldn't just read it real fast before you took the time to respond to one of my posts? I did..-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Since I'm at work, I don't have the time to quote properly, so I'll do my best for now.
Armlx: If you think I've not said much, you're not listening. I'm not sure what you expect me to pull out of my ass, but I can only discuss what is going on in the game, which I have been doing.
Korlash: I addressed your points, one at a time, with each point quoted right above it. You added some new points to your most recent post, but I don't know how I was supposed to address them before you posted them. Where TS backed down was, like I said, when she said "I'm not saying matt_s is scum". Hell, you quoted that too, I know you know where I said she was backing down, why do you have to ask this again? Also, yes, matt_s fully claimed, exactly what I expected he would through the analysis I've posted about 3 times now. All I could have posted more after he fully claimed was "I told you so", which wouldn't have been very useful. Your interactions with spy were just rehash over and over on points we discussed, I don't like going into broken record mode quite as much as you do, so I didn't bother reposting the same things I said when I discussed the exact same things with you.
You seem to equate "I'm a very confident town who knows what's going on!" with how many times you post the same point over and over like it's new, which on that scale, you're top notch, I'll give you that. But I am not going to waste the town's time. If you just listen to me the first time, we'll all be better off.
And I don't get your talk of double standard, it makes no sense.
And this game, until recently, and due to my participation in part, has been too stale for me to actually say anything about anything.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Also, I'd like to address another little piece of history Korlash has altered. He said I only come out of lurking to post in defense of someone saying my name, however, this entire argument started when I came back, with no one mentioning me, doing scumhunting when I saw something worth addressing.Surye wrote:
From out of the shadows, I call BS. Sure they could have brought you up to speed, maybe they did. You can still feign ignorance. WIFOM and all that.Toaster Strudel wrote:
I'm too lazy to search for mason in a 142 page game. If I was scum, my buddies might bring me up to speed at night... but hey, you've already made up your mind.Tarhalindur wrote:And I say you're scum because you're intentionally outing town power roles.
And I have been following this game, haven't had to much to post, but I've kept my head above water. I don't see Matt_s and crew as likely scum at all, the risk would be too huge for an absolutly game losing play. If any one of them gets lynched or vigged, the entire team would go down. Nope, they are not scum.
TS on the other hand is being pretty irrational, and even worse, is playing that dance where you cast large amounts of doubt, see if anyone bites, and if no one does, saying "I never said they were scum!". You were pretty clearly setting up Matt_s as scum, and as I stated, I believe this is most definitely false. And it's not because you are wrong that I am about to vote you, but because when no one agreed, you act as if that was not your intent at all.
Vote: TS-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
I'll be the first to admit I've been more inactive then I would like, but look at my posts in isolation, I was even discussing the game directly with you for a while, trying to sort out Matt_s v.s. Peers/Celeb. Which I turned out to be right on I might add.armlx wrote:
Before today I don't remember much.Armlx: If you think I've not said much, you're not listening. I'm not sure what you expect me to pull out of my ass, but I can only discuss what is going on in the game, which I have been doing.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
"You sorta implied" is a total rock solid case. Awesome. I didn't imply shit, I told you to stop asking him to claim, I didn't, in any way, call you scum for it. Asking for claims is a common town mistake, so I brought it to your attention. and I didn't ignore it after you brought it up, not at all, I told you EXACTLY why I didn't reply to that post, I don't know why you think I ignored it. You continue to completely ignore everything I say, and you accuse me of tunnel vision?
I'll address the rest of your nonsense post after lunch, though your complete lack of attention is getting on my nerves, and there is probably no point to reply, since two posts later, you'll just reword everything, and post it again with no regard to any of my posts.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Surye wrote:
Oh, I read it. It's just that I'd already addressed the issue of my feelings towards a full claim, why repeat it practically on the same page? Not that it much matters at this point.Korlash wrote:
That doesn't seem all that good. Good townies need to take in everyone, not just focus on one person at a time. Thats... well thats bad scum hunting...surye wrote:I'm so busy with you, I have no time for other posts.
I mean it was only one post, what you couldn't just read it real fast before you took the time to respond to one of my posts? I did..-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
Not satisfied with not reading my posts, he ignores his own!Korlash wrote:I didn't say you controled the town, I say you personally joined each wagon with absoluelty no reasoning. never said you personally lynched the mofos.
I like how you can't come up with an excuse so you stick to trying to make me look like I'm something I'm not.
Korlash wrote:Thats two people, and if I may be so bold as to say town, that you helped kill off with absolutely no contributions... Uh... pretty much at all... And now, your trying to do the same with TS, for all I know she could be scum or town, I don't care. If It hadn't been for me you would have probably done the exact same thing, made your inital case/vote post, then let the town just finish it off.-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
At L-2 you claim, by policy, yes. "Seriously can't think"? I can see your resolve is dissolving to pointless insults, you poophead.Korlash wrote:Ok... seriously have my headache back again... reading Surye's stuff does that to me all the time... so... last point then I think I'll take a break:
His vote on Bloki:
He then asks him to claim at L-2, then:Surye wrote:But the case against Celeb is weak is my point.
So he somehow goes from Bliki's case is weak, to claim or die, to vote: him. And reading his posts he never mentions why this change of heart happened.Surye wrote:Town claim, in a game this big, is no good enough to stop a lynch. Hope this and the night bring something of value. Vote: Celebloki
Um... so... to rehash...
I think Surye is scum that capitalizes on any opprotunity he can. He has only voted for people who were in the town's main focus. He has yet to produce a case against someone, and follow it through. (Not counting the TS thing. That was more him defending himself not pushing his case) He lurks, he twists my words, and uh... Seriously can't think... How can no one else see this? seriously?-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA
-
-
Surye Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: December 23, 2007
- Location: San Diego, CA