Anyone else look this up? The post seemed to show little evidence of sorgster being a bad player. It had even less evidence of the player being unreadable, which is an important component of any good policy lynch. Failure to help out with scumhunting isn't good enough. Poor voting accuracy isn't good enough. A bad, but transparent player can be ignored when he makes crappy attacks, overruled by a wise town when he votes poor targets, and then lynched or not lynched based on his attempts at play. This is why DeityKabuto is a terrible policy lynch. I won Friends and Enemies mafia partly by explaining how DeityKabuto was a strong townread and urging the rest of the town not to mislynch him after my untimely, certain N1 death (I had daykilled scum
)I have context about zdenek's usual attitudes towards policy lynching, but this comes off as pretty weak, especially when he's invited to expound on why it's a good policy lynch and what good policy lynching is and instead he just gives a post number and then lurks the thread.
vote zdenek
for now.And most of that spiel is for you folks to stop wasting time considering unwarranted policy lynching. Stop it. Unless you have a killa 7 for show and tell, it's time for old-fashioned scumhunting.