NY 187: Pariah's Mafia [/FIN]
-
-
dragonspawn
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 84, Garmr wrote:Defensive is your reaction to multiple RVs votes on yourself
Btw how can you make me being defensive the justification for your vote if you vote for me before the post that is supposedly defensive?-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
Rc not sharing information is not alignment indicative. It's commonplace.
I'm still perplexed at how I am overreacting to anything by asking questions, making notes, and pointing out sword masters omgus vote and the odd choice of voting for me because I pointed it out.
Isn't the point of this game to get out of rvs, ask questions, make arguments and make notes of odd things? If making notes of odd behavior is defensiveness and scummy then isn't your making a note of my "strange" behavior scummy as well?
What exactly is the appropriate reaction to three random votes? One being an omgus, and two for no given reason whatsoever? Was I supposed to ignore it? Was I supposed to not note it? Was I not supposed to ask what is scummy about pointing out an omgus vote? Kind of important to get into the mind of people isn't it? Especially when there doesn't seem to be anything random about the supposedly random votes.
Am I not supposed to point out inconsistent reasoning? At what point do I get too defensive? And is defensiveness even really scummy?
Im not liking bella's hedging in that post. Trying to look like she agrees with the wagon without going for it all the way. Serious vote time:
VOTE: bella
I do have to say I do like the fact that my vote for sword got us out of the rvs though I never suspected it would.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 108, Garmr wrote:If dragon spawn flips scum this game it wouldn't surprise me if boon flips scum
I won't flip scum. But I haven't seen any reasoning for my old bud boon being scummy. Got a reason?-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 111, Keyser Söze wrote:Observation #1
A defensive over-reaction for an RVS vote:
In post 39, dragonspawn wrote:So he omgus and you vote for me? And you guys don't offer any reasoning. Interesting. I'll have to make a note of that for later.
A defensive over-reaction for his earlier defensive over-reaction:
In post 109, dragonspawn wrote:Rc not sharing information is not alignment indicative. It's commonplace.
I'm still perplexed at how I am overreacting to anything by asking questions, making notes, and pointing out sword masters omgus vote and the odd choice of voting for me because I pointed it out.
Isn't the point of this game to get out of rvs, ask questions, make arguments and make notes of odd things? If making notes of odd behavior is defensiveness and scummy then isn't your making a note of my "strange" behavior scummy as well?
What exactly is the appropriate reaction to three random votes? One being an omgus, and two for no given reason whatsoever? Was I supposed to ignore it? Was I supposed to not note it? Was I not supposed to ask what is scummy about pointing out an omgus vote? Kind of important to get into the mind of people isn't it? Especially when there doesn't seem to be anything random about the supposedly random votes.
Am I not supposed to point out inconsistent reasoning? At what point do I get too defensive? And is defensiveness even really scummy?
Im not liking bella's hedging in that post. Trying to look like she agrees with the wagon without going for it all the way. Serious vote time:
VOTE: bella
I do have to say I do like the fact that my vote for sword got us out of the rvs though I never suspected it would.
Analysis
In my eyes, dragonspawn should have just put his hands up straight away and admitted that post #39 was a defensive over-reaction. He has dug himself into a hole in his own wagon.
Conclusion
If dragonspawn is town: he has a misunderstanding of RVS.
If dragonspawn is scum: this is a case of 'LAMIST': he is presuming seriousness instead of thinking about tone / context of the post.
Why would I admit it was a defensive over reaction to revs when I disagree that it was revs? Both garmr and bbt voted in reaction to my pointing out that swords move was omgus. That's not random at all. In fact,noneof the votes have been random. Not even the first vote which was omgus.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 132, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 126, dragonspawn wrote:Why would I admit it was a defensive over reaction to revs when I disagree that it was revs? Both garmr and bbt voted in reaction to my pointing out that swords move was omgus. That's not random at all. In fact,noneof the votes have been random. Not even the first vote which was omgus.
Ok, let's look back at your post:
In post 39, dragonspawn wrote:So he omgus and you vote for me?And you guys don't offer any reasoning. Interesting. I'll have to make a note of that for later.
Did you honestly expect Garmr and BlueBloodedToffee to give deep meaningful reasons why they voted for you during RVS?
Did you honestly think that 'pointing out' that Sword Master's vote was 'OMGUS', was some deep meaningful scum-hunting analysis?
I am not convinced. You are reading things out of context.
Wow
Where did I claim that pointing out omgus was some deep meaningful scum hunting analysis? I didn't take the omgus very seriously. In fact, pointing it out was me joking around with it. Sure it means the vote wasn't random but it wasn't until they reacted to that post that I saw anything interesting. Which is why I said I was noting it. Then came the "Holy heck you're so defensive!" Claims that still make no sense.
So I have to ask you this, why do you feel the need to construct straw men to attack? In fact, why are you attacking in the first place? Your pushing the wagon pretty hard for someone who isn't voting for it.
You're pushing my wagon at the same time as questioning those on the wagon not voting for any of us. Who exactly are you scum reading? Because right now it looks like you are trying to look like you are scum hunting without actually putting your money where your mouth isn-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
But I am looking at the context that's my point. I joke around and they respond with serious votes. So I give them a serious response noting their behavior and I'm taking it too seriously? I understand the context fairly well.
There were two back to back serious responses to my jokingly pointing at omgus. And to this point there has been no real attempt to explain why they responded that way. And when I try to ask question and notice this, I'm told I'm being defensive. How was I supposed to respond? I asked that a while ago but no one has answered.
VOTE: keyser[\v]
I want to see a respond to who you think are scum whether you vote for them or not. If you haven't guessed I don't like my questions being dodged-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 137, Garmr wrote:In post 136, dragonspawn wrote:But I am looking at the context that's my point. I joke around and they respond with serious votes. So I give them a serious response noting their behavior and I'm taking it too seriously? I understand the context fairly well.
There were two back to back serious responses to my jokingly pointing at omgus. And to this point there has been no real attempt to explain why they responded that way. And when I try to ask question and notice this, I'm told I'm being defensive. How was I supposed to respond? I asked that a while ago but no one has answered.
VOTE: keyser[\v]
I want to see a respond to who you think are scum whether you vote for them or not. If you haven't guessed I don't like my questions being dodged
You know my initial vote was a rvs and your response to it was when it got serious. Judging by aeronauts replies I think his the same not sure.
There is nothing that seemed random about your vote. You reacted to something I said, that is by definition not random. And when I called you on it you claimed it wasn't serious but you'll stay with it anyway.
You can claim it was random all you want, but when you are voting in reaction to something I said, there is no reason i should presume that you are randomly voting. Nor is it at all unreasonable to provide a serious response to no random votes
Again, what was the proper reaction to non random votes?
And since it didn't take before VOTE: keyser-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 140, duppin wrote:Um Dragonspawn.
Swordmaster voted on you, and you called it OMGUS. So Garmr put a RVS vote on you and then you reacted to the vote.
Except there was absolutely nothing to Indicate that garmr or bbt were making random votes as they both immediately voted for me when I said omgus. Their votes looked like a serious reaction to me saying omgus so I provided a serious response.
And why wouldn't I provide a serious response to what appeared to be serious votes? Why wouldn't I make a note of it or be curious? I'd do the same if it was someone else they were reacting to.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 156, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Gonna give this a thorough read through soon.
If I didn't know you better I would think this comment is pretty scummy. Pushing a wagon without reading through.
But from my experience this is not unusual for you.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 169, Aeronaut wrote:In post 145, Kitty Galore wrote:Hey there, so in watching the dragon wagon show, I have a couple of thoughts. I like keysers and aeronauts analysis and questioning.
My opinion of dragons response is that it is not an OVER reaction, it is a dragon reaction. I have played with him before and it seems like a typical dragon response. I don't see it being alignment indicative. I think serious votes on the wagon are bad.
This whole post contradicts itself... you say you like the questioning from Key and I, but then below you say that any serious votes on that wagon are bad? Me and Key are serious votes on that wagon.
In post 166, dragonspawn wrote:In post 156, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Gonna give this a thorough read through soon.
If I didn't know you better I would think this comment is pretty scummy. Pushing a wagon without reading through.
Why say it then?
Couple reasons. Mostly thinking out loud.
Btw key isn't voting me.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 170, Keyser Söze wrote:
Do you see her post #107 as possible active lurking?
A kind of a narration of events but not pushing anyone/or committing to anything so as to not raise attention? Also laying the foundation to placing a vote on your wagon later?
Pretty much. I'm sure when she posts more ill get a better read. But it seems a good place to start.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 181, RadiantCowbells wrote:In post 178, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 102, RadiantCowbells wrote:Spreading awareness of a tell decreases it's value.
I'd rather keep this one for myself.
You would rather weasel out of explaining anything at all.
That is, inherrently, anti town at best.
VOTE: RC
Share what you have or don't bother posting it.
What the fuck did you just say to me you little shit?
I'll have you know I'm the top scumhunter in the entire MafiaScum and have over 300 confirmed scum lynches.
I'm extensively trained in VCA and have conducted numerous secret raids on the Werewolves.
You are nothing to me but another hated townie.
Right. Top scum hunter.
Keep telling yourself that.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 223, Garmr wrote:In post 181, RadiantCowbells wrote:In post 178, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 102, RadiantCowbells wrote:Spreading awareness of a tell decreases it's value.
I'd rather keep this one for myself.
You would rather weasel out of explaining anything at all.
That is, inherrently, anti town at best.
VOTE: RC
Share what you have or don't bother posting it.
What the fuck did you just say to me you little shit?
I'll have you know I'm the top scumhunter in the entire MafiaScum and have over 300 confirmed scum lynches.
I'm extensively trained in VCA and have conducted numerous secret raids on the Werewolves.
You are nothing to me but anotherhated townie.
I did something like this to crumb a hated role once are you crumbing one?
Why would you ask if someone is crumbing something?-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 234, Shazam wrote:In post 161, Keyser Söze wrote:
Do you still stand by your first reason for voting dragonspawn? Or has his defensive-reactions added to your scum-read of him?
Both.
In post 186, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 160, Shazam wrote:This kind of defensiveness is hard to read because it's at the very least anti-town.
Why is defensiveness anti-town?
This question is such a blatant misrep that I almost want to vote you. You chopped off the context, and even in that one sentence you quoted, there is the phrase "this kind" that you just threw out the window with your question. If you are asking why a kind of paranoid defensiveness that causes a player to misread posts and think they're more against him than they really are is anti-town...I think it's pretty obvious. It hurts the town when someone misinterprets what everyone else is saying and gets super defensive about it because it is a) deceptive b) illogical and c) often seen as scummy. In this case, I do see it as scummy, which means it's at least anti-town if he's actually town.
dragonspawn wrote:In post 181, RadiantCowbells wrote:
What the fuck did you just say to me you little shit?
I'll have you know I'm the top scumhunter in the entire MafiaScum and have over 300 confirmed scum lynches.
I'm extensively trained in VCA and have conducted numerous secret raids on the Werewolves.
You are nothing to me but another hated townie.
Right. Top scum hunter.
Keep telling yourself that.
Yet another misinterpretation of a post because he can't see past people being against him.
How is rc against me?-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 251, Shazam wrote:
In post 93, RadiantCowbells wrote:Are you bleeping kidding me dragonspawn?
But more importantly, you should note that I didn't specifically say RC was against you.
Could have fooled me.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
Ill give you some reads I'm still formulating.
Town reads
Boon - cause he is still awesome. And it just feels like a town boon game so far.
Garmr - cause he has been pressuring me. I'd fully expect him to be bussing scum buddies if he was scum.
Bbt - a bit obnoxious at times but he has his own methods and he is playing similar to the last game when he was town.
Klingon - mostly because I'd be expecting her to be more involved if she was scum. That can change though.
Kitty has a slight town read for me because her posts have been geniune.
Scum leans -
Bella - for reasons previously articulated.
Prolapsed - he has been posting but not exactly providing with much substance. And his reasoning for getting on my wagon was poor.
Anna - slight scum read because she hasn't really done much other than vote for me because Dragon rhymes with wagon. I'd be expecting a bit more by now.
Everyone else is pretty null. I'd like to see more from sword master, kop (wouldn't it be ironic if he was a cop?) The cow and silver.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 284, Bellaphant wrote:That reads list is terrible, two of the town reads are really, really weak (kitty and kc). Dragon - what has bbt done that's alignment indicative? Thoughts on soze, myk and aero?
Myk, why duppin? I liked his posting si far.
Already said they are null so far.
As for bbt he is putting pressure on people and using that to formulate reads. Something I haven't seen from you, which is one of the reasons I'm voting for you.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 293, TheCow wrote:Okay, just checking. There were no other motivations, then? Alright, thank you : )
Aeronaut has influence enough, then, over you?
If by influence you mean he can ask me a question and ill respond to him without being a dick then I guess so. I'm not really sure why it would be so surprising that ill answer questions. I'm answering yours aren't I?-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 293, TheCow wrote:Okay, just checking. There were no other motivations, then? Alright, thank you : )
Aeronaut has influence enough, then, over you?
Aero
I know garmr isn't bussing his buddies because he has been voting and pushing me and I'm not one of his buddies. Obviously that's not going to convince anyone else. But we are talking about my reads not others.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 316, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:OK, that's one read and that is arguably an unreliable reason to read someone. You should focus on content, not how often they post.
When we are further along in the game I will.
I was asked for a reads lists at pretty much the beginning of day one, why on earth is anyone expecting a smoking gun case for anyone?-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 321, RadiantCowbells wrote:Any case for scum!DS which requires him to be competent is one which is unlikely to sway me.
Still upset that I'm better than you at scum hunting? Mostly because I try...-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 398, TheCow wrote:Busy with RL at the moment. I'll do an reread the thread and do an analysis on something I find interesting when I get the chance. For now, I'd be open to people asking me questions on specific matters which do not involve rereading the entire thread: I should have time enough for at least that.
What do you think of the entire thread?:)-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
Why?
Seriously if we are pressuring him to get activity why do we have to push him to L1 if he reacts before?-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
How does having a double voter mean it's a scum? Couldn't a townie have that pr too?
And how does that in any way implicate bbt? Just because he was pushing the wagon?
Seems to me that bulb would be more suspect since h specifically said he wanted to get the wagon to L1. I just don't know if the secret vote came before he joined us or not.-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 498, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Anna was fairly obviously town; Kling was the vig shot if there is a vig.
Mykonian was 100% the scum kill. Could be multi-ball with scum also looking for other scum and killing Anna, that should be considered.
Also why would scum kill an obvious townie if they are looking for other scum?-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 530, RadiantCowbells wrote:@RC, why? Dragon seems to be obv!town today
That's basically a made up read. I can't fathom any town coming to that conclusion.
So you are going to claim everyone who disagrees with you is scum?
That seems scummy to me.
-
-