All of his posts so far scream scum.
MKM II GAME OVER
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
wtf you never make posts this long, obv scumzwetschenwasser wrote:Algestrox, the archmage of Festendath, hovered in the air above his archnemesis, Zoratxix. "You fool! You know not how many times I have seen this foolish attempt at defeating me. A simple gun has no effect on the robes of an Archmage. "Ah, but this is no ordinary gun, ignorant one. You behold the handgun of Adolf Hitler himself, loaded with a bullet of pure silver." Aiming high at the flowing vestments of the wizard, the fallen angel fired his message of death at Algestrox. "No!" The bullet cleaved the red robe with a barely audible whistle and lodged itself deeply in Algestrox's chest. He plummeted to the ground, faster and faster, until it seemed that light itself moved slower than him.
"You have failed me, proud one." Algestrox's eyes opened slowly, and if in a stupor of darkness. He beheld the shining eyes of Vardath, his omnipotent master, gazing upon him. "Am I not dead?" he wondered aloud. "No. I have saved your soul from the broken body you see before you." Algestrox looked before him, and saw his robed body cleft in two, lying at the bottom of the Crater of Geteit. "Why, master? I was not worthy of your mercy. I have been insolent, too obsessed with my own power to even excercise caution, let alone weakness." "My child, my plan should not confuse you. Although you fail sometimes in your quest of righteousness and virtue, your soul speaks to me in harmony, unlike all the other humans of this earth on which you live. You must go now. I have the tools with which you shall defeat the evil plague in the form of a man who killed you. Follow your inner wisdom, and I shall always be at your side." Algestrox bowed, and as he rose, a shining robe of purple brilliance descended over his soul, and he lived again.
Heaven opened in front of him, and he saw the sky of the Earth many miles below him. "Master, I place my faith in you," he prayed, and cast his spell of teleportation down to the mountain where he had faced his nemesis. Zoratxix was still there. "Alive? Impossible!" He cast aside his earthly garments to reveal the robes of an Archmage, but black as the pits of Hell. "You, an archmage?" exclaimed Algestrox. "You stupid imbecile. Had you never known that I had power greater than you or your master?" With that, he hurled a flaming sword, materialized out of air, at Algestrox. Algestrox willed the sword away from him with a thought, and the two began a deadly struggle of power and magic. The light around them gleamed in a frenzy of attacks of fire, ice, light, and darkness. Algestrox knew it was time. He shouted unto his master for courage, and drew forth a spear of pure gold from his cloak. With the force of a thousand Ophanim, he stabbed Zoratxix through the heart, and it was over.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Obv we shouldn't nameclaim. I'm not enthusiastic about calling poptajo scum for it though - it came at a time when nothing productive was going on in the game, so I can see the possibility of him being a townie wanting to spark some discussion being at least as likely as him being scum making an obvious ploy for info.
I'm not liking AceMarksman's pattern of play so far. He seemed to put no thought into his vote - he posts it without explaining it at all. Then he provides justification retrospectively, but it is a highly unimaginative and robotic explanation, along the lines of 'massclaim is bad. Therefore, scum did it'. He doesn't seem prepared to think about people's motivations, etc. and instead just instantly votes for the first obvious questionable action he sees. I can see a potential scum outlook in that.
Unvote, vote AceMarksman
The items get used at night, so we won't be able to confirm who used them.populartajo wrote:Also, Ive been thinking in another way to possibly break this game.
Law posted in the OP that only some items work regarding alignment. Therefore we can confirm alignments with items, right?caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
I didn't play MKM1. Was there something in that game to prevent vote-amount-claiming being a good idea?Riceballtail wrote:
If like MKM1, this is a bad idea, yes. We should also assume that, since there is a real and visible votecount system again.AceMarksman wrote:I know what might help us: do you think claiming the number of votes your vote counts for is a bad idea?caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
tajo's behaviour so far is the sort that always ends up getting a lot of attention/suspicion in a game. I find that his alignment could go either way, and more analysis will hopefully shed light. Other people at least gave some evaluation up front when they suspected/voted tajo; you appeared to be acting with minimal evaluation and more of a thought process of 'look, here's the first thing i can get away with voting for, let's vote for it'. Hence my suspicion of you.AceMarksman wrote:Do you not see tajo's action as scummy?
Hrm. Why didn't you say this in the first place instead of remaining vague about your intentions?populartajo wrote:1. Last game the ONLY reason why town didnt massclaim was the famous Peach clause. (If scum found out who Peach was, game was over).
2. Weapparentlydont have in this game this clause.
3. Therefore, I wanted to evaluate the possibility of name massclaiming. Im not in favor or against it, IM JUST EVALUATING IT with the town.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Yeah, after a few seconds of confusion I decided I was town because of this and because the win condition looks reasonably like a town one.AceMarksman wrote:anywho, continuing this:
[blank]= there weren't any other player names in your role PM.Ace wrote:Um, no? Isn't it fairly obvious that bowser's army isn't the informed minority because [blank]
We can assume that scum would know that Bowser's army is town and so wouldn't make any obvious mistakes, but assuming there is a DK and a Wario in the game they could still have been caught out by it. Therefore I dont think we can wholly confirm Zwet at this point.
@ Emp, it's kinda obvious that someone was going to ask you for reasons, but I'm going to do it anyway... reasons for your vote plz.
@ Shin, what makes Gorrad likely town and zwet likely anti-town? they have both purported to have done the same thing.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Well, I suppose that if we get 17 correct answers then we didn't really lose anything.Moratorium wrote:So is the assumption here that basically Law didn't put anything in the scum role pm's that says "Hey, by the way, in case town tries this tactic, here's the list of items that town can buy and their powers"?
Does this mean you don't know what they do?AceMarksman wrote:No, because there are some roles, like mine, that aren't allowed to buy items.
Item questioning seems like a good tactic currently, if we can think up enough questions to make it work. Even if we do end up with a few players claiming not to have been given knowledge of the items, we can just separate them off first and then question everyone else. It's probably not enough to nail scum on its own but it'll give us info.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
OP says:
So people who can't buy items probably wouldn't get the info.The information of the items you can buy will appear in your role pm
Unvote
Shin, why does tajo's question make you consider him anti-town? Is it not possible that he was asking the question purposefully to gauge people's reactions due to the unexpected alignment? Also I don't think you answered my question in 147.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Don't like this post. Pressuring tajo to reveal how he is going to assess people by their itemclaims, which will just make it easier for a scum player to fakeitemclaim without any fear of getting it wrong. You know the risks of itemclaiming as they have been discussed in-thread; given that you didn't mention those, then if you are town you should have no reason to fear itemclaiming. FoSRiceballtail wrote:
For some reason, this really irked my scumdar.populartajo wrote:You guys are missing the entire point of my plan.
Right now we have 2 possibilities here. Ill comment as soon as EVERYONE has claimed if they have or dont have the items descriptions here.
I assure you that the result will be the confirmation of at least 4 townies.
Oh, right, withholding information.
I'm not throwing my hat into this until you actually share your thoughts, with a healthyFoSattached.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
And why is saying 'unfortunately' indicative of scum? To me it shows a clear disapproval of tajo's play, but I fail to see why that is a scum tell.zwetschenwasser wrote:
You made a Freudian slip of epic proportions.Surye wrote:
Whoa, interesting move zwet. Did you read my post? Do you know what rash and non sequiter mean?zwetschenwasser wrote:Nice catch, tajo.Unvote; Vote: Suryecaf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Itzwetschenwasser wrote:Not really.isopportunistic. You're just voting based on the most recent potentially-voteworthy event that happened. You vote Surye for a perceived slip, no-one follows you, you switch to one of the no-item-claimers as the massitemclaim is nearing completion. Also, what made you pick Empking?caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Instead of asking about absolute item values, maybe questions could be about relative item values? (eg. 'out of these two items, which costs more and by how much'). Could avoid the problem Mora pointed out in 462.
Or I could just answer my question already, if people want.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
The shroom costs more, by 4.populartajo wrote:caf19- out of these two items:green shell and poison mushroom, which costs more and by how?
Incidentally, this line of questioning is only good to confirm 3 people as after that the correct answers can be inferred from previous answers. (yes, this assumes that the first 3 answers are correct, but scum will know that they are correct if 3 townies have already answered. If there is a scumbag in the first 3 people, we'll know already). After the first 3 we'll be able to ask one absolute item value question (if we want to), then we'll have to use facets of the descriptions themselves to confirm the remaining people. Didn't really think about this before, my bad.
I suppose there are other questions we could ask actually, e.g. 'what is the sum of the prices of items x and y'.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Really? What order would you have asked them in to prolong the effectiveness of this line of questioning? I can't think of a way.semioldguy wrote:You have handled this plan beyond Piss Poorly. If you had actually stopped to think about your questions you could have gotten five or more item cost questions out of people instead of just four. But due to your lack of thinking things through, you didn't. You fucked that up by asking about cost comparisons in the wrong order.
I also think tajo should answer a question, at least in the interest of fairness.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Tajo, you're up. Give us the price of any item.
Not sure we should do this one.zwetchenwasser wrote:Morat, how many bowser's castle items do not involve killing?
Here's a question that I think works. Which item has the potential to have its effect during theday?caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Yes, I realise. I don't see how knowing the costs of all our items is actually going to help the scum though. Can you see a way that it would?populartajo wrote:You all realize (and specialy smeiodlguy) that if we give absolute answers, scum can deduce all the costs of the items, right?caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Here's a question for Surye.
When the holder of a bob-omb dies, what happens to it?
a) it gets given to someone else and its trade count gets reset
b) it gets given to someone else and its trade count does not get reset
c) it gets used on someone else
d) it gets used on the person who dies
e) it disappears
Standard fare, raise your hand if you think this question is useless or gives scum too much info or whatever.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Or, they could both be town who are misguided into thinking the other is scum. Given that townies don't know who the scum are, this is entirely possible.Looker wrote:They're voting for each other, believe that each other are scum - one of them has to be scum, right?
If this is your opinion, why were you so happy to vote without reading the thread? Isn't that just as tactless?Looker wrote:yes, i understand this; however, it would be kind of...tactless for me to read off something from my role pm when i don't understand the full mechanics of the game. ill get back to you after i read the entire thread, tajo...
Zwet, don't play to purposefully annoy people please.
Zeenon, hello. Answer the question in 602 please.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
That'll do for an answer, Zeenon.
Everyone who declared item knowledge has answered a question now. Discussion understandably got bogged down a bit during this episode, so I'm hoping it continues to pick up now. I'll do my bit:
ortolan seems to be a popular choice but I think I prefer Looker. I don't think the posts qwints flagged up preclude Shin from being scum at all. Declaring Bowser's Army as the town isn't a town tell, given that scum had that knowledge and were probably more sure about it in general than the town. She was also using that knowledge to try and convict another player - one who, given the current info, I have to say is probably town. Furthermore, Shin ignored questions I asked her multiple times. Looker himself has also made a decidedly unsatisfactory start. All aspects of his play (not just the early vote) seem to have a 'tactless' element to them so I don't really buy his refusal to talk about items on those grounds.
vote: Looker
Will reassess when he gets round to reading the whole thread and posting responses/opinions.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
How many of the items might end up getting used on a different person to the one you originally send them to/use them on?ortolan wrote:Seeing as we're approaching deadline and I seem to have 5 votes on me, you may ask me a question about the items, I do in fact have the descriptions and have no intention of being another deadline lynch driven by scum as per Election Mafia.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Regarding vagueness of questions, it's to stop giving too much info to scum. If a townie asks an obvious question and another townie gives the answer, it's easy for scum to work out item mechanics. Even if there is some confusion over question meanings, as there has been, it's usually possible to discern whether the answerer is telling the truth through the way they handle this (which, again, is largely what happened here).
Anyway, I'm not particularly fond of an ortolan lynch today. Can someone sum up the case on Shadow Knight for me? (or link me to a summary, if there is one already and I missed it in all the activity).caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
ort has done enough to justify his survival now.
SK isn't entirely incriminated by Ace and Gorrad's convictions since the possibitilty of him telling the truth is still there. On the other hand, his defences do have something of a 'retrospective' feel to them. After being called out for slipping, he just goes 'oh, um, I was only assuming that', something he didn't mention before, and continues on...
So, I still think Looker is the best choice, but SK probably isn't a bad one either. Given Looker's out-of-the-blue unvote of SK, there's a chance they could both be scum.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Ok, so here's my take on things.
As other people have said, we are basically back to square one regarding the confirmation plan now. I think it is more sensible to assume that qwints knew the item prices rather than just guessing lucky. Even if he had somehow worked out that the red shell cost 2 more than the green, he would have had to declare that he knew item prices without knowing what question he was going to get, and with only a minute chance of that question coming up.
So, it's a safe assumption that some scum have knowledge of items, and some don't. But presumably, last night the scum who did have knowledge would have told all the scum who don't. So now they all do, probably. Of course we don't know exactly the extent of their knowledge, but it's probably best to err on the side of caution - this means that if you're intending to use an item at night from now on, shells are probably a better option, because we have to assume that scum know how the other two work.
I'm not essentially opposed to the discussion of NKs, if they are unexpected ones as last night's was. However, in this case there are so many possibilities that I don't think it will be fruitful at this stage. Maybe the scum NK by buying and using their items, and they couldn't afford any (Shadow Knight was their richest player, or something)? Maybe the scum's NK got redirected? Random vidgeing? Who knows. It could be useful later, but I don't see a lot of conclusions that we can draw right now.
Anyway, onto today.
I know about his meta and the shallow waters blah blah, but seriously, zwet is scummy. Now that he's not 'confirmed' anymore , I can't help but note that he is 'playing up' to his meta. He is tunneling with woefully inadequate reasoning, purposefully exaggerating the aggressiveness and dumbness of his posts in order that people will go 'oh, it's just zwet being zwet'. And it seems to be working - a decent wagon is building up on tajo. I'm not really a fan of the tajo wagon, he's too much of an easy target. (and so is zwet, you might respond, except that nobody is going after zwet...)
Also, I was suspicious of Looker yesterday and still am today. Check out how qwints tried to clear him in 646, and the out-of-the-blue unvote of SK in 818. Looker needs to start posting ftw so I can further assess him.
More later.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Needless to say, I can't really believe you off the back of this sort of vague reference. Am I to take from this that tajo proposed a massclaim in another game and ended up being scum, or what? If you really can't say anything about this unconfirmable meta, I humbly request that you give us some instances of where tajo has been scummy in-thread.zwetschenwasser wrote:mod: this is a quote of post 1008
Did you just read the name of the last person who got suspected in-thread, and decide you wanted them lynched? Or do you actually have reasons for this?Riceballtail wrote:I could go with a Gorrad lynch right now.
As for my opinion, Kast's points against Gorrad are justified but I don't find that evidence such as an unwillingness to discuss NKs is in itself enough to make him scum. So, while they do point out the illogicality of his principles, the effect they have on his likelihood of being scum is minor.
Incidentally, I'm kinda wondering why Gorrad's activity has jumped so much. He's posted about as many posts in the 48ish hours of today as he did all of yesterday. Newfound vigour, perhaps?caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
semioldguy wrote:So your saying that Shadow Knight predicted that the item claim plan would get him lynched, and so then claimed that he had no item descriptions five days after the game started, all as an elaborate Day 1 self-bussing maneuver to put tajo in a better light?
Did I hear that correctly?
Seriously zwet, I can't believe that even you would think this to be true. Are you just doing this to get reactions? Are you scum?zwetschenwasser wrote:YEScaf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Have to say, this post is full of fail.WeyounsLastClone wrote:At first I found Gorrad a bit overanxious to hear from sirdan, but now his silence is a bit awkward (not that I have posted much, but I think it's different from someone who joined from outside the game). Still, I find Gorrad's reactions a bit off.
I don't think tajo is from the Mushroom Kingdom, and I don't really like his wagon. Somehow I suspect him to be Wario or something.
Someone else who I find scummy because he's being opportunistic is caf19.
Feels a bit like if tajo pops up town, he can say 'i told you so', and then go after zwet. He rubbed me wrong day 1 too, but I can't pinpoint exactly what. Hope to do a reread this weekend.caf19 wrote:I know about his meta and the shallow waters blah blah, but seriously, zwet is scummy. Now that he's not 'confirmed' anymore , I can't help but note that he is 'playing up' to his meta. He is tunneling with woefully inadequate reasoning, purposefully exaggerating the aggressiveness and dumbness of his posts in order that people will go 'oh, it's just zwet being zwet'. And it seems to be working - a decent wagon is building up on tajo. I'm not really a fan of the tajo wagon, he's too much of an easy target. (and so is zwet, you might respond, except that nobody is going after zwet...)
Firstly, you think tajo might be a third party role but you don't like the wagon on him? Doesn't make sense.
Secondly, all I'm doing is saying I don't like the tajo wagon, which is roughly what you also did in this postIf that's setting myself up for an 'i told you so', then so be it. It's not what my intention is, but in any case I don't see what's inherently scummy about that, unless you are implying that it's because I'm scum who knows tajo is town already. If so, what's the basis?
Thirdly, you seem to assume that there is something inherently wrong with 'going after zwet'. Is there, when he's constantly making craplogic-ridden, anti-town posts? Do you think zwet is town?
-
They are down as different alignments in the item section of the OP. So I think it's a good assumption that they are third party still.populartajo wrote:1.Can we assume that Wario in DK are scum in this game? Because if we do, Im pretty sure they are on the "I refuse to" or "I dont have item descriptions".
Not really possible to say with any certainty, but I'd hazard that the scum are spread fairly evenly over both the 'haves' and 'have nots'.populartajo wrote:2. Does everyone think that we can at least have one scum in the "I refuse to" or "I dont have item descriptions"? Or do you think that SK was the only one that didnt have item descriptions?
-
Perhaps, but Morat also seems to agree with my case, which is built around the fact that you are purposefully being anti-town and know you can get away with it due to your meta. So it's not exclusively a policy lynch.zwetchenwasser wrote:Morat, please shut up if you have no case. Policy lynching is bad at this stage.
Please at least make an attempt to explain your conclusion. If you don't, I'll have no choice but to assume that it is of the same quality as the rest of your conclusions, which is to say, tripe.zwetchenwasser wrote:You claimed Wario!caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
I feel like an idiot for actually going through and detailing what is wrong with this, but for the sake of logical argument I will do so anyway.zwetschenwasser wrote:He was very eager to describe the previous Wario role to me. It seemed too eager, in fact.
1) You asked him to do so, twice.
2) In my opinion, it is more suspicious to ignore questions than to answer them.
3) Being eager to talk about Wario in the previous game doesn't mean you are Wario anyway. Really, I can see no correlation between the two.
4) Your tactic of 'ask someone a question then vote them because they answered it' is an incredibly scummy entrapment process. I can't believe anyone in the world would do this from a pro-town perspective. Die.
vote zwetcaf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Hmm, I'm not so sure about this. If town have a source of getting people to jump in, it's entirely likely that the scum have one too - it just has to be quite hard for them to do it to keep the game balanced. I've been thinking about what the scum items do, and I think the 1-up mushroom would probably fit flavour-wise the mechanic of bringing people 'to life' so they can jump in. Obviously, this would cost a lot of coins.WeyounsLastClone wrote:@ Gorrad: why would you automatically infer that when you didn't create sirdanilot in this game, it'd mean scum created it? I don't think there are magic users in the Mushroom Kingdom that could summon a Toad or something. It would be too powerful if scum could summon new players that easily. If it costs a lot of coins as you say, I doubt anyone could buy it first night.
Given that the scum didn't seem to get an NK last night, this might imply that they used their coins on a 1-up shroom instead. Obviously there's quite a heavy amount of speculation involved in this, which is why I'm not piling onto a danilot vote (also, we have zwet). Point is, it's very possible that scum have a jumping in mechanic and Gorrad's point shouldn't just be dismissed like that.
Your vote on Gorrad is badly placed, imo.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Ok, zwet's claim didn't present us with any huge reasons not to lynch him.
His claim wasn't a huge disaster but is weak and nebulous enough that it could easily have come from scum. The fire-resistance seems to fit flavour-wise, but obviously scum would know their own killing methods. It's something that could have been fabricated without too much trouble.
Then again, the nagging voice in the back of my head tells me that for a zwetclaim, 'not a disaster' is probably the best thing you're going to get...
ort, how certain exactly does your info make you that zwet is town?caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
I could think of that too, but it's not really an overwhelming indicator of townnessortolan wrote:
I can think of a plausible hypothesis whereby what he said is perfectly credible.caf19 (1204) wrote:ort, how certain exactly does your info make you that zwet is town?
Namely if his pm simply said he had immunity to fire.the alternative hypothesis, that he is scum who has knowledge of all the NK methods and resistances, is just as likely.
caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
I don't think Looker should claim.
Yesterday I found him very suspicious; today he hasn't really made any meaningful posts. We can get more out of him - there's no need to rush at this stage.
Looker, you need to make an effort to catch up with your reading, or at least tell us who you think is scummy from the recent posts or what you've read so far. It's for your own good, because if you don't then I'll be forced to rely only on my read of you from yesterday; i.e. that you're scummy.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
I'm still generally up for a zwet lynch, but if support for it is waning then I'll have to look at other options. Reread time.
These are all reasons why tajo isn't obvtown, not why he is anti-town. What do you think makes him scum?Riceballtail wrote:VOTE:Tajo
You need to stop bringing up your plan as how great and wonderful it makes you. Yes it killed a scum, but you could have easily done it intentionally to bus. Leading a lynch on scum D1 doesn't make you town. Especially when you backed off right before the actual lynch.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
Good use of unexplained bolding. I assume you're implying that I'm scummy for just going along with other people's opinions. If that's the case, I don't really care if you think it's scummy. That post is exactly how I felt at the time. I've been focusing on zwet and if I can't get him lynched then I'll have to widen the search.sirdanilot wrote:caf19 wrote:I'm stillgenerallyup for a zwet lynch,but if support for it is waning then I'll have to look at other options.Reread time.
How is any of this a scumtell?sirdanilot wrote:I'll reread this guy some time. He seems to fall in the same category as WLC, as well as quints on day 1 (now flipped scum). Posting reasonably regularly, although not ubiquitous, and posting content as well as scummy things like these. Short periods of absence are common.
I was voting zwet at the time (still am) and it's fairly obvious I wanted him lynched. What kind of a fence is that?sirdanilot wrote:
lol blatant zwet lynch push. wiffle waffle I am sitting comfortably on my fence.caf19 wrote:Ok, zwet's claim didn't present us with any huge reasons not to lynch him.
His claim wasn't a huge disaster but is weak and nebulous enough that it could easily have come from scum. The fire-resistance seems to fit flavour-wise, but obviously scum would know their own killing methods. It's something that could have been fabricated without too much trouble.
Then again, the nagging voice in the back of my head tells me that for a zwetclaim, 'not a disaster' is probably the best thing you're going to get...
ort, how certain exactly does your info make you that zwet is town?
It's not rolefishing when you consider that at the time, there were people who were just flat out asking ortolan to reveal his roleinfo. This was a more useful and less potentially anti-town approach.sirdanilot wrote: In his last line he is doing something we could interpret as rolefishing but maybe that would be just atiny bittoo fast...caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
I'm not interested in 'keeping my options open'. Case in point: I've stated my distaste for the wagon on tajo (who is the other common object of suspicion today).sirdanilot wrote:1. Oui/Yes/SÃ/Ja . And how you're generally up for a zwet lynch. Keeping all options open. As if you weren't looking for other people while the zwet thing was still popular opinion. In fact I have no reason not to believe the latter, since you're probably scum who don't have to scumhunt by definition.
A general summary: yesterday Looker was my main suspect and he got my vote. Now that line has kind of died due to Looker not posting and being replaced - there's nothing there to analyse or interact with. As you can see from my post 991, Looker and zwet were my suspects, but the disappearance of Looker led the bulk of my posting to be focused on zwet. Given that my focus had narrowed down like that, it felt natural to try to widen it again.sirdanilot wrote:2. Refusal to defend yourself will unfortunately not help you here. It looks like you aren't able to defend yourself. Pro-tip: defending yourself is pro-town.
3. I think that a reread is in order to address this since I think it would be very interesting to find out who you 'suspected' before all this.
[bolding mine]sirdanilot wrote:The purpose of pressuring and claiming (something which I think shouldn't have hapened at the time but that aside) is to show if someone is scum. The fact that zwet is not a confirmed towny doesn't give you any reasons to lynch him. (insert rant about why the english language doesn't support trivial dutch words like 'wel' rendering me unable to express exactly what I meant and having me resort to things like bolding blablabla)
Since his claim 'wasn't a huge disaster'. Your main point is basically, 'it could have come from scum' and 'scum could have fabricated it'. All in all, not more than you know of a normal person who hasn't claimed yet.
All this isn't that bad per se. You are not scummy for pointing out that the claim wasn't decisive of zwet's alignment one way or another. But you are scummy for wanting to lynch himsolelybecause of that, while it is no reason to lynch zwet!You can now only lynch zwet if you have additional reasons.For example role related reasons of other people, and play style elements etc. For the former, we haven't really had anything conclusive, since gorrad says he's scum and ort says he's town, with neither of them providing reasons, and I haven't seen you give a convincing play style based case on zwet. But as I said I need to reread you.
Fail. Please see my posts 991, 1052, 1084 etc. for places where I build up several reasons to lynch zwet which have nothing to do with his claim (he hadn't claimed at that point). At this point, zwet seems overwhelmingly scum to me, so his claim should only convince me to unvote if it contains strong info that indicates town alignment. As it was, his claim was quite weak and could easily have been invented. Why should I back off solely due to that?
Not as helpful to them as ortolan fully revealing his role-related info. As it happened, it now seems to me that ort doesn't have any more info than I do and he is just forming different conclusions from it. So, no problem.sirdanilot wrote:What would you have done if the answer was 'very certain'? What if it was 'probably'? Wouldn't that information be potentially helpful to the scum? Oh whoops that's you.
So, sirdan, do you think zwet is scum or not? (preview edit: Mora asked more or less the same question. Get answerin'.)caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
I don't really think that ort has role-related info, or is softclaiming to that effect. I just think that he has a tendency to become incredibly sure of himself (it's the same sort of thing as when he said zwet is town). This doesn't really impact on ort's likely role or alignment at all.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
sirdan, I really don't understand the case you are pushing on me at all. It's like you just decided I'm scum and then started tunnelling with random points on me regardless of their relevance... yesterday was a non-day where we had basically already decided to lynch millar. I don't see what tangible difference a couple of extra sentences would have made.
Anyway, all my prior suspects are dead. So, um, yeah, I'll have to rethink stuff.
This also applies to killa seven. k7, you haven't mentioned anyone except zwet (who flipped town now) in forever. Get to postin'.Gorrad wrote:Hey Riceball, what do you think about the game? You've lurked so hard, I can barely tell.caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
*twitch*Empking wrote:vote: Kast
Gut but I'll look to see if I can find something to support it.
Care to share any suspicions with us?killa seven wrote:
how rudesirdanilot wrote:Has k7 even posted at all the last 10 pages?mod please replace out k7 while we can before he posts a useless post and denies us the right to replace him out
Also I just noticed we've also had epic silence from ZEEnon recently. What's up, ZEEnon?
-
Anyway, there are two things that I find unsettling about Gorrad's claimed role: firstly, why a role like that would claim so early when it seems so important to the town, and secondly, why he hasn't been killed yet.
The first one does seem to have a plausible solution, which is that he claimed in the hope of confirming sirdan as scum (due to the jumping in mechanic). Incidentally, Gorrad, what do you think of sirdan these days?
The second one, I'm not so sure about. Can you offer any explanation, Gorrad?caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com-
-
caf19 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 919
- Joined: February 1, 2008
I believe Gorrad has the skills he says he has. The only doubt is that he could be DK/Wario and have them. However, I don't see why a third party role would get an investigation skill when they don't care all that much about finding scum - so, I'm inclined to think he is town right now.
Given that this implies ortolan is also town, our options are narrowing somewhat...
One player who I'm not happy with is Zeenon. Since he replaced in, he's flipflopped on the Shadow Knight lynch (compare 846 with 861) and on subsequent days he's hardly posted anything that isn't IIOA. Even taking into account the pile-on-fests that were ThAdmiral and millar, it's impossible to work out who he suspected on D2 (and there was plenty of discussion D2 before ThAdmiral came along, so this isn't something common to everyone).
@ ZEEnon: who do you suspect? What have they done to deserve your suspicion? Got any observations from Day 2 (or 3)?
--
@ Empking: Found anything suspicious about Kast yet?
@ sirdan: If I'm obvscum, why aren't you voting for me?caf
http://thenailbiter.wordpress.com