Star Wars Quote Mafia- Game over

BabyJesus · Post Post #28 (isolation #0) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 6:45 am

vote thok

BabyJesus · Post Post #77 (isolation #1) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:52 am

unvote, vote armlx

BabyJesus · Post Post #86 (isolation #2) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:46 pm

elvis_knits wrote:I don't like how BabyJesus only jumps on bandwagons and doesn't say anything. I guess that's why he's "not helpful."

fos at elvis_knits

BabyJesus · Post Post #93 (isolation #3) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 2:35 pm

rajrhcpfreak wrote:I plead to everyone here that when we get close to a lynch on anyone we wait for a post count before the lynching vote.

nah

BabyJesus · Post Post #128 (isolation #4) » Thu Nov 24, 2005 4:16 am

vote dranko

BabyJesus · Post Post #153 (isolation #5) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 5:53 pm

Dranko20 wrote:someone give me solid reasons why im scum and i'll claim.

Why would you be unsure that this game has Star Wars quotes as role names.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #183 (isolation #6) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 5:11 pm

vote peacebringer

BabyJesus · Post Post #198 (isolation #7) » Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:43 am

unvote, vote elvis_knits

BabyJesus · Post Post #204 (isolation #8) » Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:12 am

Quailman wrote:I'd like to know why BabyJesus unvoted the lurker PeaceBringer after he popped in to say hi. He seems to be begging to be lynched, and yet BJ lets him off the hook.

FOS: BabyJesus

vote: PeaceBringer

unvote, vote Quailman

BabyJesus · Post Post #211 (isolation #9) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 8:07 am

Mr Stoofer wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
unvote, vote Quailman

Imediately afterwards, Dranko20 wrote:
unvote; Vote quailman

And then straightaway PeaceBringer wrote:
unvote, vote Quailman
Could one of you explain this bandwagon to me?

Just follow the crowd.....you know you want to.

BabyJesus · Post Post #216 (isolation #10) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 9:27 am

RangeroftheNorth wrote:I think I will leave my vote where it is. You sort of expect that behavior from BJ, but following him? Absurd.

X

only good things happen when you follow me.

BabyJesus · Post Post #219 (isolation #11) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:02 pm

PBuG wrote:Hmm... which member of the Quailman bandwagon should I vote for?

Unvote if I have a vote on someone, Vote: PeaceBringer

He was 3rd on the bandwagon.

How do you know its a bad bandwagon.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #239 (isolation #12) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 6:18 pm

Fritzler wrote:
TSAGod wrote:
RangeroftheNorth wrote:So we have a very sudden and completely random bandwagon on Quailman. That worked out so well for us when we did it to Thok.
Do you have a better plan?
Not without a daykill.

wish I could help with that.

BabyJesus · Post Post #250 (isolation #13) » Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:44 am

Fritzler wrote:Why is Quailman not lynched yet?
Slackers.

I agree with this guy

BabyJesus · Post Post #253 (isolation #14) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:05 am

RangeroftheNorth wrote:Shouldn't you guys at least have a reason to be lynching quailman?

no

BabyJesus · Post Post #264 (isolation #15) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:16 am

RangeroftheNorth wrote:As far as I can tell there is no reason for the quilman bandwagon

well you are voting for Dranko who has claimed a quote - do you have a reason why you think his quote is a "bad" quote?

BabyJesus · Post Post #268 (isolation #16) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 12:29 pm

Shamrock wrote:So, can we hear a reason for the Quailman bandwagon, BabyJesus?

no

BabyJesus · Post Post #273 (isolation #17) » Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:09 am

SOS wrote:Reason for the bandwagon is that babyjesus is incredistupid and fritzler has a lack of love, dranko doesn't know anything, peacebringer mad about the modkill in the other game, raj is sexually frustrated and TSAgod an idiot.

unvote
.

imbeciles

Oh yea, your contributions so far have been phenomenal.

BabyJesus · Post Post #281 (isolation #18) » Mon Dec 05, 2005 4:36 am

SOS wrote:Wow Babyjesus, just like your contributions, wich come down to "vote random dude x" and "no" "no" "no" "I agree with this guy" "my brain is nonexistant.

if Quailman vote stall, I think we should runup this hypocrite.

BabyJesus · Post Post #289 (isolation #19) » Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:54 pm

Dranko20 wrote:
ibaesha wrote:I also find SOS suspicious but I can't quite put my finger on what it is that's bothering me.
completely agree

I agree also.....but I hate to let Quailman off the hook without claiming.

BabyJesus · Post Post #292 (isolation #20) » Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:56 pm

PBuG wrote:
Unvote: PeaceBringer, Vote: Dranko

Whereas, the voting for PeaceBringer is going nowhere.

Whereas, you are on the stupid Quailman bandwagon.

Whereas, you are BJ's f**king sheep.

Considering he has already claimed, can you address one of your points on why you do not believe him??

BabyJesus · Post Post #296 (isolation #21) » Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:24 am

PBuG wrote:I didn't see that post, okay?

Unvote; Vote: BabyJesus

Quailman was bandwagoned for no reason, and now I'm starting to think it was because lots of people just want to know his role.

This is most definitely helpful.

So you didn't even bother to read the posts of the guy you voted for?? Nice. Are you scum with SOS?

BabyJesus · Post Post #304 (isolation #22) » Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:45 pm

unvote, vote SOS

not that I believe Quailman. there's 5 million quotes to chose from, not like a fake is that hard. SOS has been acting pretty scummy tho.

BabyJesus · Post Post #310 (isolation #23) » Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:22 pm

RangeroftheNorth wrote:
not that I believe Quailman.
there's 5 million quotes to chose from, not like a fake is that hard.
You keep asking why we don't believe dranko, and then you say this. And
quailman claimed a role
. Dranko didn't even bother to do that. Quailman claims a fairly well known quote, while Dranko's is fairly obscure, and gives a role, not just a quote, and you are still suspicious of him, yet you cannot understand our continued suspicions of dranko? Seems odd to me.

how is it odd? I'm not voting Quailman anymore. I just think we should get some people on record as to what their quotes are.

BabyJesus · Post Post #311 (isolation #24) » Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:23 pm

PBuG wrote:It's not me. If it was me, then why is it only happening in this thread?

I'm keeping my vote on BabyJesus for being stoopid.

how am I stoopid again? FOr voting without reading several pages? O wait, that was you.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #313 (isolation #25) » Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:28 pm

PBuG wrote:BabyJesus. just stop posting. You keep contradicting youself. Like you said, people could be lying about their quotes. And some quotes would make the role obvious, like mine.

I never contradicted myself, Mr. "I don't read the whole thread". I don't necessarily believe anyone who has claimed a quote yet. However, I don't think we should lynch anyone who has claimed their quote, either, without some reason why we think they are lying. Hence my unvote of Quailman.

BabyJesus · Post Post #315 (isolation #26) » Tue Dec 06, 2005 5:43 pm

PBuG wrote:You went berserk when I voted for Dranko!

It's not my fault that people post when I'm gone and I don't keep track of the last post I read, so stop picking on me just for that.

asking you why you voted for a guy is "going beserk"

nice

BabyJesus · Post Post #329 (isolation #27) » Wed Dec 07, 2005 4:18 pm

Why isn;t SOS dead yet?

BabyJesus · Post Post #331 (isolation #28) » Wed Dec 07, 2005 5:17 pm

rajrhcpfreak wrote:because im not going to be a sheep twice and follow you everytime you change your mind.

BabyJesus · Post Post #332 (isolation #29) » Wed Dec 07, 2005 5:17 pm

oh, fine I may as well hop on the dranko bandwagon so I look suspicious.

vote dranko

BabyJesus · Post Post #378 (isolation #30) » Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:13 am

unvote, vote peacebringer

BabyJesus · Post Post #430 (isolation #31) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:07 am

vote PeaceBringer

BabyJesus · Post Post #434 (isolation #32) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:56 am

rajrhcpfreak wrote:following BJ once again?

peacebringer is a BG....

BabyJesus · Post Post #436 (isolation #33) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:03 am

PeaceBringer wrote:wrong and neither are you unless I am a complete naive idiot

skimmer you are caught!!! Confess...

BabyJesus · Post Post #460 (isolation #34) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:10 pm

unvote, vote SOS

BabyJesus · Post Post #462 (isolation #35) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:06 pm

actually

unvote

this is stupid. If we have claimed vigs, we let them shoot each other tonight and see what happens.

BabyJesus · Post Post #464 (isolation #36) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:11 pm

Fritzler wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:actually
unvote

this is stupid. If we have claimed vigs, we let them shoot each other tonight and see what happens.
Except dranko said his was one shot.

Ahh....

So we make Coron prove he is a vig by shooting Dranko tonight. If he fails, we lynch him.

BabyJesus · Post Post #465 (isolation #37) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:11 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
Fritzler wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:actually
unvote

this is stupid. If we have claimed vigs, we let them shoot each other tonight and see what happens.
Except dranko said his was one shot.
Ahh....

So we make Coron prove he is a vig by shooting Dranko tonight. If he fails, we lynch him.

And by Coron I of course mean SOS.

BabyJesus · Post Post #467 (isolation #38) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:14 pm

Now I'm confused... we have SOS claiming vig, and Dranko claiming one shot do-it-all.

What is coron again?

BabyJesus · Post Post #470 (isolation #39) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:07 pm

Fritzler wrote:Coron's not in this game.

this is where looking at page one would have been helpful.

OK, so SOS must shoot Dranko tonight. If he fails, we lynch him. And RangeroftheNorth can track him to confirm it was him...

BabyJesus · Post Post #472 (isolation #40) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:30 pm

Fritzler wrote:No ranger = roleblocker.

goddamn it

BabyJesus · Post Post #474 (isolation #41) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:03 pm

Fritzler wrote:I say lynch SOS, it seems much more likely he's lying then dranko right now.

why not let him prove his claim though? Wo says we can't have 2 vigs. Shouldn't be that tough.

BabyJesus · Post Post #479 (isolation #42) » Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:23 am

SOS wrote:I am a 2 shot vig, and I targeted stoofer.

Stoofer was generally playing with randomly thrown out votes, having people defend their votes and then saying "I get what you are saying and it's not like I have something to put against it, but my vote stays anyway" .

I'll claim later today, since I am a goner anyways (either lynch or nightkill).

Unless people want me to claim now. do you? pleeeeeeaaaaaaaase?

why don;t you prove yourself by targeting dranko tonight....

BabyJesus · Post Post #482 (isolation #43) » Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:37 am

vote Shamrock

BabyJesus · Post Post #484 (isolation #44) » Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:40 am

Fritzler wrote:
unvote, vote: Shamrock

hi

BabyJesus · Post Post #487 (isolation #45) » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:39 am

SOS wrote:Sure, I'll vig
someone
Dranko tonight. Though I would like to hear some input from other people instead of a mindless bandwagoner and a mindless bandwagonjumper.

fixed

BabyJesus · Post Post #494 (isolation #46) » Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:52 am

PeaceBringer wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
vote Shamrock
what are you DENSE!

Shamrock, Thoth, and you are not bad from what I have seen.

eh, I forgot you had cleared him.

vote zufaul

BabyJesus · Post Post #500 (isolation #47) » Fri Dec 16, 2005 9:01 am

Fritzler wrote:
RangeroftheNorth wrote:Six votes in less than two hours. I think that's plenty.
um, no its 8 to lynch, we need two more

fos at rangernorth for pretending 6 was enough to lynch him

BabyJesus · Post Post #522 (isolation #48) » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:47 pm

unvote, vote sos

BabyJesus · Post Post #533 (isolation #49) » Sat Dec 17, 2005 3:06 am

SOS wrote:wich is exactly what I said. he plays on safe for 2 townies, one is dead already and the other one is the one confirmed by you (peacebringer).

It's not too hard to frame me then, wich is the only 'new' result he has.

so if you come up GG then, we have a guaranteed scum to lynch tomorow....

BabyJesus · Post Post #544 (isolation #50) » Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:50 am