Sounds like something an SK would say....
VOTE: MegAzumarill
Sounds like something an SK would say....
Not to worry, I assure you we are a normal human just like you!
Of course.In post 30, imaginality wrote:SK specifically?In post 17, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:Sounds like something an SK would say....
VOTE: MegAzumarill
Enchant is rarely a good d1 lim. I don’t see why he’s scummy?
We just mean that it takes time to properly determine your alignment, and we don't think ceejay actually has anything on you.In post 58, Enchant wrote:You saying it like i am good d2-4 elim. bruhIn post 55, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:Enchant is rarely a good d1 lim. I don’t see why he’s scummy?
Yeah, I would say so, it’s the kind of thing he pretty much does preety much every game.In post 63, ceejayvinoya wrote:It seems like you having prior experience with Enchant gives you an advantage into reading him, which is okay. That said...In post 55, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:Enchant is rarely a good d1 lim. I don’t see why he’s scummy?
This is his first post.
This is his second. I don't really like how it did not point out anything happening so far or really push anything or something.In post 32, Enchant wrote:I am Jester
Of course this could just be Standard Enchant Behavior and you're free to tell me more about this.
Enchant is a trolly/shitposty player who's secretly one of the better players on site. He'll have infrequent/insignificant posts until there's something worth saying. Frankly, I'd be more worried about him if he WERE putting in effort this early.ceejayvinoya wrote: I don't really like how it did not point out anything happening so far or really push anything or something.
Of course this could just be Standard Enchant Behavior and you're free to tell me more about this.
Hydra of Radical Rat and Nancy Drew 39, you know us!In post 66, Enchant wrote:who are those people who know me but i don't know them
In post 67, Galron wrote:I don't think this is true.In post 31, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:Of course.In post 30, imaginality wrote:SK specifically?In post 17, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:Sounds like something an SK would say....
VOTE: MegAzumarill
Mafia would have said "didnt roll maf," and Town would have said "didnt roll town"
What about N_M's claim?
You bringing it up as a counter to Meg being SK, at a time when you ostensibly believed it was a serious accusation, implies that you believe the claim. If you didn't, it wouldn't interfere with Meg hypothetically being SK at allIn post 78, Galron wrote:Who said that I believe the claim?
I would like to know that as well.In post 84, Testarossa wrote:But why was that scummy?In post 79, Galron wrote:That's the point isn't it.In post 76, Testarossa wrote:Why though? The only thing that happened between this and your rvs was the vote on me and his comment on it.In post 46, Galron wrote:I'm good with my vote
Okay, I'm starting to see where you're coming from.In post 86, ceejayvinoya wrote:It's not really a scummy vote but her responding to the inactivity in the thread with a random vote sort of rubbed me the wrong way.
Also it's not accurate to say that low effort rvs is what I found scummy on enchant's posts. I voted him because his second non-rvs post was unrelated to anything so far that happened in game and did nothing.
Meg, why are you voting for ceejay? Why is he scum?In post 99, MegAzumarill wrote:Not really much.
Unrelated but I do like Galron for town here
Think 79-81 leans more into town than scum
In post 107, MegAzumarill wrote:It's not the vote I had the problem with, it was that they were asked if they had a reason and they basically replied yes, but im not saying itIn post 105, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:Meg I don’t understand why you are more pinged by 34 where ceejay has a vote that he’s not particularly confident on but you have no concerns with 79 where galron has a confident read that he has yet to explain?
This is the refusal I mean.In post 79, Galron wrote:That's the point isn't it.In post 76, Testarossa wrote:Why though? The only thing that happened between this and your rvs was the vote on me and his comment on it.In post 46, Galron wrote:I'm good with my vote
I think you’re talking semantics here. Refusal, non-answer, pretty much same difference isn’t it?In post 112, MegAzumarill wrote:Given they haven't posted since I wouldn't call it a refusal.
In post 115, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:I think WE’RE talking semantics here. Refusal, non-answer, pretty much same difference isn’t it?In post 112, MegAzumarill wrote:Given they haven't posted since I wouldn't call it a refusal.
I'd like to let Galron respond for himself as to what his intentions were/are. Say I'm right in my interpretation. You providing an alternative before Galron says his gives him a plausible out that he would have had to come up with on his own otherwise.In post 117, imaginality wrote:I see post 67 differently to you. My take on it was Galron was just asking for your take on Not_Mafia's claim rather than specifically using it to refute your take on Meg.In post 111, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:VOTE: Galron
Upon reflection and discussion, there's just nowhere else I'm comfortable with my vote being right now.
I think Galron's weirdness with regard to my RVS accusation of Meg as SK, bringing up Not_Mafia's claim to refute it and then claiming not to have believed it, could be indicative of him being just the killer we're looking for.
That, on top of his very strange votes and refusal to elaborate on them.
I think you're confused and Galron's bemused by your confusion and I get the sense you're both genuine.
There was one thing in your post which made me wonder: "it, could be indicative of him being just the killer we're looking for".
Though I"m prepared to accept that it's just because you're discussing your SK read on Galron rather than an indication you're solely looking for the SK.
Do you have any hunches on who the Mafia might be?
Mafia will have Daytalk.
The Mafia may only kill on Even nights (Night 2, Night 4, etc)
The Serial Killer may only kill on Odd nights (Night 1, Night 3, etc)
Pre-Game, the Serial Killer chooses between Investigation Immunity (Shows up as Town to investigation) or One-Shot Bulletproof (Negates the first time they would die to a night kill).
If all Mafia Goons or the Serial Killer is killed, the Serial Killer or Mafia Goons will be allowed to kill regardless of the night number.
To address this part, what I'd be looking for is the usual scum behavior, but lacking associatives. Like, if I saw someone overreach to defend scummy behavior from another player, I'd assume them to be Mafia, and look for scum activity outside the involved slots to find the SK.In post 120, Testarossa wrote:How do you distinguish between looking for SK and scum? So far all I see is coming from the early "joke claims" in the beginning? (and treatment of those)
This is very obviously not a serious vote.In post 31, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:Of course.In post 30, imaginality wrote:SK specifically?In post 17, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:Sounds like something an SK would say....
VOTE: MegAzumarill
Mafia would have said "didnt roll maf," and Town would have said "didnt roll town"
So I don’t see the problem then?In post 132, Galron wrote:Because I thought the same thing and it wasn't hard to arrive there.In post 82, MegAzumarill wrote:Why is it easy?In post 80, Galron wrote:This is true but it's an easy take.In post 77, Testarossa wrote:I kind of like ceejay's 49. At least the first genuine town pings I got this game. The Enchant vote supports it, although Enchant is rather pretty null to me, but I felt about it kind of similar.
In post 140, Galron wrote:Right. So why are you still voting me?In post 138, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:So I don’t see the problem then?In post 132, Galron wrote:Because I thought the same thing and it wasn't hard to arrive there.In post 82, MegAzumarill wrote:Why is it easy?In post 80, Galron wrote:This is true but it's an easy take.In post 77, Testarossa wrote:I kind of like ceejay's 49. At least the first genuine town pings I got this game. The Enchant vote supports it, although Enchant is rather pretty null to me, but I felt about it kind of similar.
VOTE: 39rats
In post 142, Galron wrote:In post 141, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:In post 140, Galron wrote:Right. So why are you still voting me?In post 138, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:So I don’t see the problem then?In post 132, Galron wrote:Because I thought the same thing and it wasn't hard to arrive there.In post 82, MegAzumarill wrote:Why is it easy?In post 80, Galron wrote:This is true but it's an easy take.In post 77, Testarossa wrote:I kind of like ceejay's 49. At least the first genuine town pings I got this game. The Enchant vote supports it, although Enchant is rather pretty null to me, but I felt about it kind of similar.
VOTE: 39rats
I don’t see why YOU had the problem with Tetra’s post. You never explained that and that’s why I’m voting you.Testarossa's post was completely NAI.In post 132, Galron wrote:Because I thought the same thing and it wasn't hard to arrive there.In post 82, MegAzumarill wrote:Why is it easy?In post 80, Galron wrote:This is true but it's an easy take.In post 77, Testarossa wrote:I kind of like ceejay's 49. At least the first genuine town pings I got this game. The Enchant vote supports it, although Enchant is rather pretty null to me, but I felt about it kind of similar.
That was quick.
@Galron, why are you not addressing this?In post 143, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:In post 142, Galron wrote:In post 141, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:In post 140, Galron wrote:Right. So why are you still voting me?In post 138, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:So I don’t see the problem then?In post 132, Galron wrote:Because I thought the same thing and it wasn't hard to arrive there.In post 82, MegAzumarill wrote:Why is it easy?In post 80, Galron wrote:This is true but it's an easy take.In post 77, Testarossa wrote:I kind of like ceejay's 49. At least the first genuine town pings I got this game. The Enchant vote supports it, although Enchant is rather pretty null to me, but I felt about it kind of similar.
VOTE: 39rats
I don’t see why YOU had the problem with Tetra’s post. You never explained that and that’s why I’m voting you.Testarossa's post was completely NAI.In post 132, Galron wrote:Because I thought the same thing and it wasn't hard to arrive there.In post 82, MegAzumarill wrote:Why is it easy?In post 80, Galron wrote:This is true but it's an easy take.In post 77, Testarossa wrote:I kind of like ceejay's 49. At least the first genuine town pings I got this game. The Enchant vote supports it, although Enchant is rather pretty null to me, but I felt about it kind of similar.
You are implying that I contradicted myself with that post. I made it clear that isn’t the case. I don’t understand how if you came to the same conclusion as Tetra that you had an issue with it. I generally don’t vote people who mindmelded with me.
In Royalty, we actually seriously tried to yeet the mod, it didn’t succeed.In post 177, MegAzumarill wrote:ik right
In post 196, ceejayvinoya wrote:Eh? What part of that was nice to you?
Tho I guess I no longer have to worry about imaginality being mafia with Galron...
I don’t think he sounded like a buddy with this.In post 189, imaginality wrote:Wow yeah Kop's still self-voting. Kop had better put that vote to better use before deadline.In post 186, Testarossa wrote:Kop, who is scum?
I would say based off of 189 I agree with you.In post 202, Testarossa wrote:I am kind of on [Gypyx, Kop, Meg] right now.
Just checked Gypyx ISO and didn't felt anything at all. I have to take a closer look here. Intuition may say maybe lost townie. ehhh
Meg got better for me during D1, however their townread on Galron and equalizing the Gypyx wagon with Galron didn't age too well for them in retrospect.
Kop hasn't given one single read and all he did so far was dismissing things (including townread on flipped town) or saying why some things can't be. Rather destructive type of posts. Between the lines he seemed on the fence about Galron too, but didn't really commit to it then.
VOTE: Kop
Depends entirely on which immunity they chose, which we have no way of knowing at this point, so... I don't find this line of thinking useful or relevant.In post 205, MegAzumarill wrote:Do we think Sk aimed at Goon or cop?
It could have been that Not_Mafia knew he wouldn't be taken seriously, and was performing light distancing. Also could have been that he was legitimately SK and telling the truth in both statements. Also could have been that he meant nothing at all.In post 208, ceejayvinoya wrote:
What's interesting is that his predecessor posted this about Galron:
Which makes me think he could at least be, uh... not mafia.
Do you think Enchant is being scummy? Because I haven't seen anything that would necessitate him being "given a pass" yet.In post 218, Gypyx wrote:i'm also actually wondering why Enchant is given a pass by so many peoples
And does this look like Mafia bussing their buddy to you?
If Meg is a Galron buddy making this post, I’d be seriously impressed because you very rarely see scum just straight up admit to that.In post 230, MegAzumarill wrote:I mean I was genuinely playing to avoid a Galron lim and the only difference there between scum! and town me there is probably motivation
Because she’s straight up admitting to wanting to save Galron which is not something you typically see from a buddy.In post 234, Enchant wrote:whyIn post 233, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:If Meg is a Galron buddy making this post, I’d be seriously impressed because you very rarely see scum just straight up admit to that.In post 230, MegAzumarill wrote:I mean I was genuinely playing to avoid a Galron limand the only difference there between scum! and town me there is probably motivation
Playing or not playing is nia for NM. I’ve seen both town and scum games where he efforted and both town and scumgames where he did pretty much nothing.In post 264, Enchant wrote:Imagine rolling SK and not playing.In post 261, Testarossa wrote:I am mostly scumreading Kop here while my only doubts about that slot come from N_M's short interaction with Galron, which looks kind of weird. Kop is way too defensive imo.
How do you distinguish between N_Mtown and N_Mscum?
NM simple not dick enough to annoy teammate with this opening. Regardless what you want to say, NM knows how to play.
So yeah, i can assure. Like, with 80% chance sure.
I think we should probably follow dead town’s lead. Idk about Enchant because I think hiis stance on Kop looked pretty damned townie to me but Gypyx is still my strongest sr too.In post 271, Kop wrote:Whilst that is a convenient claim to make, I haven't exactly covered myself in glory to prove that I am, a VT. But I'm telling you the truth.
It's too close to deadline to switch to another wagon, but if I had to switch, the only real option that could flip scum, would be gypsy. I don't think she's exactly covered herself in glory.
I think the strong two town in my mind of Rats and Testarossa, that leaves the last scum and SK within enchant, Gyspy, meg and outside chance of ceejay.
My voting order personally would go in this order, gypsy. enchant, ceejay and Meg. I don't think I can see it being within the two town in my mind.
VOTE: Gypsy
@RR why can’t Gypyx be mafia?In post 289, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:We'd thought that if you were Galron's buddy, you'd have either not hammered or not defended him as explicitly as you did.
However, Kop was the only other one who made sense as a buddy, so I have to have been wrong on you.
Why couldn’t SK have been offwagon?In post 295, Testarossa wrote:Fixed D3 to D4. Forgot we are already at D3.In post 293, Testarossa wrote: I don't see Megscum shotting Gypyx here or vice versa. Both need the other to survive to D4 as the probability that town will just continue to hunt the second Goon in those two is pretty high. If only one is left, then... yeah.
The SK was on the Galron wagon (not counting Meg, since they only hammered in last minute). It's kind of the conclusion from the imaginality kill anyway imo.
Gypyx and Imaginality were voting each other and Imaginality just happened to be the nk.In post 175, Marashu wrote:
However, it’s also possible that Gypyx could be Galron buddy offwagon.In post 294, Testarossa wrote:Huh?In post 292, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:@RR why can’t Gypyx be mafia?In post 289, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:We'd thought that if you were Galron's buddy, you'd have either not hammered or not defended him as explicitly as you did.
However, Kop was the only other one who made sense as a buddy, so I have to have been wrong on you.
I am also confused as to why Nancy felt the need to post here instead of just asking me directly, but the answer is Gypyx COULD be, but I think Meg has a positive associative while Gypyx seems more unaligned.In post 300, Testarossa wrote:I was actually just confused why you were asking yourself why Gypyx can't be Mafia when you just voted her. I guess it wasn't the other hydra head then who voted, nevermind.In post 298, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:However, it’s also possible that Gypyx could be Galron buddy offwagon.In post 294, Testarossa wrote:Huh?In post 292, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:@RR why can’t Gypyx be mafia?In post 289, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:We'd thought that if you were Galron's buddy, you'd have either not hammered or not defended him as explicitly as you did.
However, Kop was the only other one who made sense as a buddy, so I have to have been wrong on you.
I usually forget anyway, so I usually don’t bother unless either people complain about it or it’s part of some gimmick.In post 302, 39 Rats in a Trench Coat wrote:On one hand, signing would help with these situations...
On the other hand, I think part of the fun of being a hydra is the blending, and signing negates that somewhat.