In post 160, ceejayvinoya wrote:@Gypyx assuming 39 Rats is mafia do you think the Serial Killer getting eliminated early (as well as the absence of a kill on the first night) would help them?
no, more like, take it like this, the harder peoples are looking for the SK, the less they're looking for Mafia tells, and, considering mafia is way easier to hunt for early, it's just way more sound to swing that way
besides yeah, it would absolutely help them i think, but that's maybe not something that's worth debating on? Like, no SK, no crosskills, simple as that
In post 163, Kop wrote:But there is only 60 or so posts in the game and a lot of that was RVS filled with a bunch of nothing. Yes there are things that could be pushed but nothing of note as stood out that much that looks out of the ordinary.
(just quoting that for space)
so basically, you're arguing that there are very few posts, some with light differences, but that at the same time we shouldn't push those posts that looking somewhat worse?
To put it another way, why argue that it's not significant enough when it's basically quite good for what we have?
In post 157, ceejayvinoya wrote:You keep slightly asking stuff like opinions and reads but you don't really follow up on anything, except for your read on me.
I'm not sure how to explain this but the way Enchant posts seem to come from a town POV, or at least non mafia. Plus he's got 39 Rats vouching for him that this is just how he is early game.
Trying to regain my basics before i get into the more complex lines of thought
and eh... if we're both going off of feels, let's just wait to see more from enchant then lol
"how he is early game" doesn't make him town really, i wasn't feeling bad about the style of posting
In post 164, Kop wrote:No one has said that you 100% believe the claim, but you trying to draw attention to the claim kind of spells that you have some thoughts on it.
This is a stretch (nothing about "What about Not_Mafia's claim?" implies "I believe Not_Mafia's claim") and makes me think you are just wanting to keep suspicion on Galron. Also in the exchange you quoted, 39 Rats said "your implication of believing Not_Mafia's claim interests me" so for you to say to Galron no one has said he believes the claim is plain wrong.
Not mafia claims the same thing in almost every game, drawing attention to it in the manner that Galron did, makes me believe he is trying to put attention on it, when it's a common trait from NM.
I don't know if Galron has any experience playing with Not Mafia, so I'm not sure if he is aware that NM almost all the time does the same thing.
In post 164, Kop wrote:No one has said that you 100% believe the claim, but you trying to draw attention to the claim kind of spells that you have some thoughts on it.
This is a stretch (nothing about "What about Not_Mafia's claim?" implies "I believe Not_Mafia's claim") and makes me think you are just wanting to keep suspicion on Galron. Also in the exchange you quoted, 39 Rats said "your implication of believing Not_Mafia's claim interests me" so for you to say to Galron no one has said he believes the claim is plain wrong.
Not mafia claims the same thing in almost every game, drawing attention to it in the manner that Galron did, makes me believe he is trying to put attention on it, when it's a common trait from NM.
I don't know if Galron has any experience playing with Not Mafia, so I'm not sure if he is aware that NM almost all the time does the same thing.
This doesn't answer my second point that you said no one thinks he believed Not_Mafia's claim but 39 Rats said "your implication of believing Not_Mafia's claim interests me".
I still seriously doubt Galron is scum.
@Testarossa what's your take on Gypyx?
@ceejay same question
"holy shit this entire time i thought imaginalitys profile was a purple seahorse" - camelCasedSnivy
In post 164, Kop wrote:No one has said that you 100% believe the claim, but you trying to draw attention to the claim kind of spells that you have some thoughts on it.
This is a stretch (nothing about "What about Not_Mafia's claim?" implies "I believe Not_Mafia's claim") and makes me think you are just wanting to keep suspicion on Galron. Also in the exchange you quoted, 39 Rats said "your implication of believing Not_Mafia's claim interests me" so for you to say to Galron no one has said he believes the claim is plain wrong.
Not mafia claims the same thing in almost every game, drawing attention to it in the manner that Galron did, makes me believe he is trying to put attention on it, when it's a common trait from NM.
I don't know if Galron has any experience playing with Not Mafia, so I'm not sure if he is aware that NM almost all the time does the same thing.
This doesn't answer my second point that you said no one thinks he believed Not_Mafia's claim but 39 Rats said "your implication of believing Not_Mafia's claim interests me".
I still seriously doubt Galron is scum.
@Testarossa what's your take on Gypyx?
@ceejay same question
I failed to see that point, and most likely at the time spoken without thinking.
