Realistic Mafia - Game Over

armlx · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:08 pm

Surye wrote: I'm not sure, I have this gut feeling there's a connection of some kind between him and armlx, and I don't trust it. They seem to back each other a lot.

I tend to back people whose judgment and townishness I trust. I'd cite examples, but the only one I'm can think of now that I'm actively aware of was scum chat.

armlx · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:50 pm

EBWODP: (And ongoings I'd rather not cite).

Natirasha · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:17 pm

I had a long post, but the internet ate it.

...k.

...I think we need to see the scene of Sarc's death. There may be some tools to find out what really killed Sarcastro. Suyre might be able to get some forensics stuff and we could go to town. Anyone willing to go? I'll go, but I need some backup.

armlx · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:21 pm

Natirasha wrote:I had a long post, but the internet ate it.

...k.

...I think we need to see the scene of Sarc's death. There may be some tools to find out what really killed Sarcastro. Suyre might be able to get some forensics stuff and we could go to town. Anyone willing to go? I'll go, but I need some backup.

Good posting, irrel at this point.

sideney · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:22 pm

I will be offline until monday 14.

Hjallti · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:34 pm

Okay I just read through the claims and deads of Primate and Battle Mage. (I think

vote: Battle Mage

is not really necesarry anymore...)

Hard game to read, somehow, and totally different from real mafia, but that is exactly what I hoped for.

So we have another 8 days of daytime ahead, with already 2 lynches and 1 daykill.

Next thing I want to do is to read singled out persons, but I want to ask first at everyone the very question I am asking myself, as it might be an interesting question to start the third period of this first day:

Who needs to get extra attention?
To answer partly myself: I'llo begin with Surye (town angle) and Celebloki, and than decide who's next.

Battle Mage · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:54 pm

skitzer wrote:
Vote: Battle Mage

Anyone who has a visible daykill must not be good.

BTW, if I leave temporarily, it's to put a lock on my door and hide the key in a safe place. Just lettin' ya know.

everyone here has a visible daykill. Try your ??? option.

Battle Mage · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:55 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote:BM, I want to hear your reasons for thinking Primate was scum.

His claim didnt add up atall, it had so many inconsistencies, and was a massive coincidence with the whole 'Home Alone' thing. I thought if i nailed scum, i could save myself for a while longer.

BM

Battle Mage · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm

dahill1 wrote:
unvote vote Battle Mage

it's kind of obvious to vote BM now, and BM will you PM me when you have the whole thing arranged with the backup mod?

Zindaras has agreed to be Back-Up Mod. Im just waiting on Tally now to confirm that we can start. You still willing to be my Co-Mod?

BM

Battle Mage · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:02 am

dahill1 wrote:
armlx wrote:
skitzer wrote: Anyone who has a visible daykill must not be good.
Correction: Anyone who D1 uses a visible day kill on someone who has someone backing up their story of how things went down must not be good.
Correction II: "uses a visible day kill
with a knife
"

that was for ironic purposes. The ultimate irony being me dying. :p

Quick, see if you can get a unanimous lynch on me before the mod shows up!

Oh and btw, i was scum with CyberBob. Last night it was him who made the kill (i forgot that when i claimed lol), while i went to visit Khelv for a friendly chat. I strongly suggest you ask him why he wasnt home.

Hope this is of some use. The game had us screwed over from the start.

Good Luck Town! Armlx, you're added to my pre-sign up player list.

BM

armlx · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:21 am

Battle Mage wrote:
Oh and btw, i was scum with CyberBob. Last night it was him who made the kill (i forgot that when i claimed lol), while i went to visit Khelv for a friendly chat. I strongly suggest you ask him why he wasnt home.

Hope this is of some use. The game had us screwed over from the start.

O RLY?

And ya, agree 4x cop is a little busted....

Surye · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:27 am

Hmmm.. not 100% what to make of this twilight scum claim. Oh well, it's not of much consequence either way at this point, though, if BM is telling the truth, then we have 2 very likely clean cops, which is awesome.

There seems to be a small group forming against Celebloki, who I don't really get a strong tell either way. If he is scum, I have a feeling about ABR as a scum buddy, but since I get a town feel from ABR, I don't think Celeb is likely scum.

Those that are setting him up for the next lynch, what are your points against him?

dahill1 · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:36 am

Battle Mage wrote:
dahill1 wrote:
unvote vote Battle Mage

it's kind of obvious to vote BM now, and BM will you PM me when you have the whole thing arranged with the backup mod?
Zindaras has agreed to be Back-Up Mod. Im just waiting on Tally now to confirm that we can start. You still willing to be my Co-Mod?

BM

yep still willing!

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:02 am

Battle Mage is lynched. And if he was not (Cause I couldn't care to count), he is modkilled for advertisement.

Votes are reset.

Surye · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:44 am

ABR, Thoughts on Celebloki?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:06 am

What did he do of notice ? All he did was vote BM iirc. Why am I connected to Celebloki ?

Surye · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:41 am

Not connected perse, just your total ignoring of him when everyone was on an anti-celebloki thread.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:45 am

Isn't it armlx who started that trend ? Why would I be concerned by anything armlx does ?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:12 am

Actually, I might agree with a Celebloki lynch, but I will attempt a little

experiment

first.

Celebloki · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:22 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote: Actually, I might agree with a Celebloki lynch, but I will attempt a little experiment first.

What kind of experiment?

Surye wrote: Those that are setting him up for the next lynch, what are your points against him?

Yes can someone please tell me what they have against me? From what I gathered, people didn't like the idea of me wanting to investigate Cyberbob, or at least just send Surye, and we all saw how helpful it was when Nab went there on his own. And it also seems that some people were irked because I merely asked if it was possible to end the day early. So if someone could enlighten me on what they have against me, please do so.

NabakovNabakov · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:41 am

It's fairly obvious that we should completely ignore BM's claim until actual allignments come out. It likely indicates that BM is indeed anti-town (if he's pro-town he's lying for no damn reason), but it could easily be an effort by him to influence any more lynches we might have in the next week.

Surye · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:49 am

We've lost 3 already today, 1 of them confirmed town. Do we really want to lynch anymore before N1...?

armlx · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:50 am

Theres

1) Continuing to attack SF for lurking when the kind of lurking he was doing was clearly and had been stated to be non-intentional lurking, which is merely bad play not scummy.

2) Wanting to go with to investigate Cyber's house when you are in no way confirmed (As opposed to fairly expendable in case of traps and sorta in a way confirmed).

3) Wanting to just end the day.

Also minor issues

A) Including an SK on your list of possible killing groups when there were only 2 kills and mod stated 2 mafia N1, though this is minor as SK is common enough to possibly assume in large themes.

B) The OMG DONT CHECK MY HOUSE joke.

Thats pretty much the whole thing. I wouldn't put you past a 65-70 on the vollkan scale, but thats scummy enough for now.

Surye · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:07 am

armlx wrote:Theres

1) Continuing to attack SF for lurking when the kind of lurking he was doing was clearly and had been stated to be non-intentional lurking, which is merely bad play not scummy.

I asked what made him scummy

armlx wrote:2) Wanting to go with to investigate Cyber's house when you are in no way confirmed (As opposed to fairly expendable in case of traps and sorta in a way confirmed).

But this isn't a real tell, a townie would want to trust it, and when he said this, the idea of traps had not been brought up.

armlx wrote:3) Wanting to just end the day.

I was the one who brought this up first I think, but since I'm pretty much confirmed town, you jumped on him for saying the same thing as me and called it a scum tell?

armlx wrote:A) Including an SK on your list of possible killing groups when there were only 2 kills and mod stated 2 mafia N1, though this is minor as SK is common enough to possibly assume in large themes.

Listing out possibilities (and given that BM may well have been one) is hardly a scum tell, it's not like he was persuading to hunt an SK.

armlx wrote:B) The OMG DONT CHECK MY HOUSE joke.

Yea, jokes are dangerous in mafia.

armlx wrote:Thats pretty much the whole thing. I wouldn't put you past a 65-70 on the vollkan scale, but thats scummy enough for now.

I don't see anything more then air at this point, and you put him at over half likely to be scum?

FoS: armlx

Celebloki · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:12 am

armlx wrote: 1) Continuing to attack SF for lurking when the kind of lurking he was doing was clearly and had been stated to be non-intentional lurking, which is merely bad play not scummy.

Even though he stated it was lurking due to laziness and not just lurking I still don't like the idea of lurkers, this game was already going slow as it is.

armlx wrote: 2) Wanting to go with to investigate Cyber's house when you are in no way confirmed (As opposed to fairly expendable in case of traps and sorta in a way confirmed).

I never said I wanted to go by myself, and I even stated that I would be fine as long as Surye went since he is the most confirmed here. I just didn't like the idea of people completely unconfirmed going and then having to "trust" what they saw. I was saying that I would go with people, and again that I would be happy as long as Surye at least went to go investigate.

armlx wrote: 3) Wanting to just end the day.

I just don't like how when we lynch people we don't see the alignment. I'm just concerned that we'll lynch people, then lynch people helping them, then lynch cops investigating them and the next day we find out they were all Town. Yes theres the risk of all the infinite night possibilities happening, but I just felt that if everyone played their cards right they could protect themselves at night.

armlx wrote: A) Including an SK on your list of possible killing groups when there were only 2 kills and mod stated 2 mafia N1, though this is minor as SK is common enough to possibly assume in large themes.

B) The OMG DONT CHECK MY HOUSE joke.

And those 2 go together, I was joking about staying away from my house, not checking it, I'm just paranoid at all the nightkillers we may have and somehow I got a high profile in this game, so I was half joking to all the possible killers out there to stay away from me.