Dynamite Stick Mafia! GAME OVER

[Sarcastro]

I think somebody should kill Quag.

[Sarcastro]

Sarcastro is probably scum

Really? Figured that out from my one post, did you?

I'm a bit confused - I thought LML had killed Ooba. Did I miss something?

[Sarcastro]

Skruffs, stop acting foolish. Asking whether or not LML killed Ooba had nothing to do with whether or not I want day to end. Your logic is nonsense. Why would I feel the need to "encourage further stimulation"? What does that even mean?

[Sarcastro]

Since when do people act smart in Bad Idea-type games?

[Sarcastro]

I'm talking about people in general.

[Sarcastro]

So anyway, I hear Yos is scum.

[Sarcastro]

You seem a little too hung up on Elmo's mistake. Feeling sensitive, are we?

[Sarcastro]

Okay, we can kill Skitzer instead. Or you can kill Skitzer.

[Sarcastro]

Please don't vote for me. It is mean.

[Sarcastro]

Sorry for lurking, guys - I had a brutal week of essays and exams and this game wasn't really inspiring enough to make time for.

I'm really getting annoyed with Pokerface. Seriously, what's with all this "appeal to emotion" bullshit? Do you honestly believe what I said was scummy? I can't even fathom how that could be. You look like you're reaching desperately for some kind of validation of your suspicions here. I really

want

to say it's scummy, but I might just be blinded by the fact that you're acting utterly foolish.

[Sarcastro]

Sarcastro's defense hasn't been an appeal to emotion, but it's certainly been bullshit. Posting a non-defense and then railing on somebody who notes it's a non-defense completely skirts the issue at hand. A slow-burn red-herring.

I didn't rail on somebody who "note[d] it's a non-defense". I railed on somebody who tried to argue that it

was

a defense. Read Pokerface's posts. He seems to think that I was actually trying to use an emotional appeal as a defence.

Also, Quag is full of shit.

Also, CES is scum.

Also, if you bastards let Yos live to endgame I will kill you all. I remember what happened with MoS in Bad Idea II.

I expect that there's a good chance I'll have to make the kill today, which is understandable.

[Sarcastro]

Sarcastro's defense hasn't been an appeal to emotion, but it's certainly been bullshit. Posting a non-defense and then railing on somebody who notes it's a non-defense completely skirts the issue at hand. A slow-burn red-herring.

I didn't rail on somebody who "note[d] it's a non-defense". I railed on somebody who tried to argue that it

was

a defense. Read Pokerface's posts. He seems to think that I was actually trying to use an emotional appeal as a defence.

Present most people with something that doesn't make sense and they'll try and add their own. Either way, non-sequiter = non-defense = appeal to emotion.

That's fantastically bad logic. How can it be an appeal to emotion if it's not an appeal?

[Sarcastro]

Well, I wasn't scum, but to be honest I played so poorly I probably deserved that. I'm not sure why you guys didn't at least get Surye to blow me up, though.

[Sarcastro]

Sarc wins again!