Beep! Beep! wrote:petroleumjelly wrote:10.)
Include the CKD-wagon.
11.)
Include the CKD off-wagon.
Well. That's a tougher one because it's recent and fewer of the players have had their alignments revealed.
curiouskarmadog - 5 (hasdgfas (1) (assumed town), Battle Mage (2)(town), Mathcam (5), petroleumjelly (7), Holy (9)).
AGAIN
, I believe that at least one scum jumped on that bandwagon. Maybe even two, since the scum is doing so well, they can afford to bus big time to earn some late game town cred. And guess what, it's my top three acting up again,
mathcam, PJ and Holy
.
<snip>
It's between mathcam PJ and Holy. Which one (or two?) bus'ed CKD?
You've played your theater quite well I think, because today when reading the arguments between you and PJ, back and forth I'm thinking if you're perhaps simply just a townie which too confident with your own method.
But, if you're really have a confident with your formula in catching scum, you won't play with your calculation result, but you did play with it. For an example, earlier today your result was:
Beep! Beep! wrote:No known scum hiding off wagon? Fifty scumpoints each.
TOP THREE:
petroleumjelly 178
Amelia 103
MeMeMe/mathcam 40
but you changed it like in the uppermost quote (underlined)^
So, what the use for you to insist using the method if it's not for covering your excuses as scum? I've tried to see it from another perspective, but it just failed every time I tried to rely with the method, it lack of behaviour analysis which at anytime may bring different results too.
Beep! Beep! wrote:There is no compelling reason NOT to lynch me, and there are none marching over the horizon. I am vanilla, so I'm screwed. I have no night action to prove myself or to be proven by others. I don't even have a vote. I am a completely useless player, everything I say is wrong anyway, the way I find scum is utter and complete rubbish and there is not value to it. I am the PERFECT lynch for today. No better alternative will show up.
These kind of things always successfully give me a headache, I really need to re-read you, which I only have the time to do it on weekends.
And you kept saying PJ is scum, but besides your score, you didn't help us to discover the things we may missed about him as likely the scum?
Although so far in my eyes, when reading his arguments, he seems pro-town for me.
Beep! Beep! wrote:BTW Holy, how is YOUR method for finding scum? Is is better than mine? Do you think that anyone that doesn't find scum in a manner that is approved by PJ is scum? It's my method, I like it, and I believe it to be effective.
Lynch me for it, scumbag. I dare you.
My method is based from knowing the players behaviour from watching them enough, my experiences and being aware of crap-cases which likely came from scum. I'm still learning, so I don't think it's better than yours :p
Well, we have our own methods, why should we seek PJ's approval???
If you believe for it effectiveness, you're supposed to be consistent with your method results, wouldn't you?
Why don't you 'scum-hunt' rather than provoking your lynch if you're really a townie then...
In addition, I've noticed Iammars' contribution (although still not many) today which nothing alarming, but I don't really satisfied with Mizzy's little contribution today though, I definitely will re-read AmeliaSlay/Mizzy this weekends besides re-reading you.