TSPN wrote:Alright, I guess I'll accept that for now.
Unvote, vote mafiaSSK.
So, are you iceman's scumpartner or are you just buddying up?
So you accept what he said, and say he is his scumpartners.
Nice...
ZeekLTK wrote:Second, trying to lynch Cake would only be scummy if he were town. We don't know that he's town. If he is scum, then how am I scummy for pushing for the lynch of scum?
So, everytime a townie is lynched, everyone who votes for him is scummy? Also, you are saying that bandwagoning someone is not scummy?
ZeekLTK wrote:How does it not make sense? You said it's scummy of me to want him lynched. But how is it scummy if he turns out to be a mafia member?
How are you sure he isn't mafia? Rushing the kill will only give town less time to argue.
ZeekLTK wrote:Also I love the votes against me:
One because I wasn't online the day the roles were sent out and thus was the last to confirm
One OMGUS
One "chainsaw defense" of the guy who cast the OMGUS
lol
You know what I love? Your over reaction to votes.
TDC wrote:I disagree. It might not happen too often, but scum can and probably will lynch each other if they think it makes the lynching scum look very town.
You should not conclude that someone is town, just because he is "responsible" for a scum lynch (especially if he used poor reasoning).
It's obviously somewhat less scummy than being responsible for a town lynch, but still "pushing" for a lynch implies that you want that person dead, and that means you're either scum or have very good reasons to think (or even know) the lynchee is scum - or even both.
:Goodposting:
TDC wrote:lol TDC. Care to explain how me wanting to lynch Cake is scummy? I can see how you might disagree with it. But to add vote #4 to a player who has done nothing scummy looks very badly for you
Nothing scummy does not result in 4 votes :teach:
ZeekLTK wrote:And you also failed to answer his question with your OMGUS FoS.
Don't answer other people's questions. Don't.
TSPN wrote:So, iceman: your plan is to vote and suspect people who start wagons. All that's going to do is encourage timid play from townies who don't want to get voted for voting someone else.
No, it's voting for people who start wagons without a reason, and have bad reactions when people call them out. It's actually a pretty good tactic
TSPN wrote:Sorry if I'm being a tad standoffish, but some players are pretty much using the 3rd-vote scumtell, which is unreliable at best, anti-town at worst.
It is unreliable when it is a set in stone move. But when someone simply jumps on a bandwagon with little to no reasoning, it is usually a scum tell.
Fos ZeekLTK, TSPN
until we get a votecount and a quota for a lynch