Newbie 594: (Game Over!)

BlackWolf · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:01 pm

zu_Faul wrote:Shouldn't you try to get as many reactions as possible?

I got reactions from five different people, and I thought that was enough from one post.

Rickeon · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:52 pm

zu_Faul wrote:
Unvote, Vote Rickeon

Well, I really don't see what I could defend. I haven't done anything that could go either way yet this game.

zu_Faul · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:38 pm

Rickeon wrote:
zu_Faul wrote:
Unvote, Vote Rickeon
Well, I really don't see what I could defend. I haven't done anything that could go either way yet this game.

Your passiveness is astonishing. There have been some things going on until now. You need to comment.

Nocmen · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:24 am

Rickeon wrote:
zu_Faul wrote:
Unvote, Vote Rickeon
Well, I really don't see what I could defend. I haven't done anything that could go either way yet this game.

You do have something you defend. You seem like you are unwilling to criticize anyone or call anyone out for their actions. You just want to sit back and let what happens happens, and my feeling is that you will use that and jump on a wagon later.

Atticus · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 3:59 am

Hey guys, I was a bit busy recently, but here I am. I'm happy to say that Rickeon is looking like scum to me. Well, not happy, it'd be great if like, no one was scum. His lurkiness is not what gets me. He seems to be under the impression that smart-assiness will get him out of his situation. True, he can't defend much from zu_faul's vote, but he can comment, which is all we ask, truly. But he doesn't seem to want to do that. He seems to want that he be allowed to kill at night and to not be bothered in day.

FoS: Rickeon

.

Nocmen · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:28 am

That, and the other thing is that he only seemed to come out when he were called out, aka actively lurking.

Battousai · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:15 am

Well rickeon, could you comment on Blackwolf's vote and his posts after that? That would be something.

silence · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 4:55 pm

Atticus: why are you still having your vote on me?

bird1111 · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Sun Apr 20, 2008 3:27 am

Vote Count:
BlackWolf (2): Nocmen, Battousai
Battousai (1): split9102
Rickeon (1): Zu_faul

Not voting (5): silence, Rickeon, BlackWolf, gorillaman, Atticus

With 9 alive it is 5 to lynch.

Nocmen · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:16 am

Unvote, Vote: Rickeon

Atticus · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:23 am

silence wrote:Atticus: why are you still having your vote on me?

I am not still having my vote on you.

silence · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:19 pm

Atticus wrote:
silence wrote:Atticus: why are you still having your vote on me?
I am not still having my vote on you.

Sorry, somehow missed the unvote.

Battousai · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:32 am

Battousai wrote:Well rickeon, could you comment on Blackwolf's vote and his posts after that? That would be something.

Rickeon · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:37 am

Battousai wrote:Well rickeon, could you comment on Blackwolf's vote and his posts after that? That would be something.

Sorry, I was distracted over the weekend.

Well, he made an obviously ironic statement, then suddenly changed his story to it being a test. It seems like the original post was a bit too obviously ironic to be accidental, but I don't know. I find it hard to believe someone would seriously post something like that an not immediately notice the contradiction.

I suppose if he was aware of the contradiction, it doesn't really tell us anything. He would have motives to do something like that either way. If he wasn't aware of what he was doing, then it's pretty obvious he had a motive for pointing attention to someone. But, once again, I don't think it was unintentional.

Really, the only person that's standing out to me as suspicious repeatedly is Battousai, but I can't entirely pin down why.

Rickeon · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:39 am

My sentences wander a lot more than I intended in that post...

I suppose I should have proofread a bit more...

Battousai · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 10:35 am

Rickeon wrote:
Battousai wrote:Well rickeon, could you comment on Blackwolf's vote and his posts after that? That would be something.
Sorry, I was distracted over the weekend.

Well, he made an obviously ironic statement, then suddenly changed his story to it being a test. It seems like the original post was a bit too obviously ironic to be accidental, but I don't know. I find it hard to believe someone would seriously post something like that an not immediately notice the contradiction.

I suppose if he was aware of the contradiction, it doesn't really tell us anything. He would have motives to do something like that either way. If he wasn't aware of what he was doing, then it's pretty obvious he had a motive for pointing attention to someone. But, once again, I don't think it was unintentional.

Really, the only person that's standing out to me as suspicious repeatedly is Battousai, but I can't entirely pin down why.

Now was that really that hard to do? Posting about something in the game and telling us how you read it? Maybe next time you won't need someone to point something out to get your reaction from it.

Nocmen · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:40 pm

Unvote

My vote was for pressure. Now that he has posted about something I can remove it. For now.

zu_Faul · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 10:42 pm

There are still other things to comment on, Rickeon (everyone else as well). Also picking on battousai when you can't say why seems too opportunistic for me.

bird1111 · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:06 am

split9102, BlackWolf, and gorillaman prodded.

split9102 · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:25 am

Sorry about not posting recently, I didn't have good access to my computer recently.

gorillaman · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:35 am

I find split and BlackWolf's lurking very suspicious. ;)

I'm struggling for something original to say. I agree BlackWolf's reaction-getting explanation is BS. zu-Faul's town vibe on silence after four largely inconsequential posts was strange.

As for recent events, the pressure voting of Rickeon is all fair play; I don't like anything about Atticus' post 104; I'm sorry for having to be prodded.

Battousai · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:17 am

zu_Faul wrote:Also picking on battousai when you can't say why seems too opportunistic for me.

Could you reitirate that plz? I don't understand.

zu_Faul · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:41 am

Battousai wrote:
zu_Faul wrote:Also picking on battousai when you can't say why seems too opportunistic for me.
Could you reitirate that plz? I don't understand.

He chose to attack you, without bringing any reasonable reason.
I already attacked you earlier, and not thatm uch else has been going one. Therefore I find it quite opportunistic that he chooses to attack you.

BlackWolf · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:34 am

Responding to prod.

gorillaman wrote:I find split and BlackWolf's lurking very suspicious.

I'm gonna assume you were joking with that statement...since I've actually been busy the last couple days.

zu_Faul wrote:He chose to attack you, without bringing any reasonable reason.

After a few people pressured him to post

anything

repeatedly, does it really count as opportunistic?

gorillaman · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:22 am

BlackWolf wrote:I'm gonna assume you were joking with that statement.

Well assumed.