Dynamite Stick Mafia! GAME OVER

[Cogito Ergo Scum]

That's kind of an unexpected comment. Why, exactally, do you think Elvis_knits is pro-town?

Not really pro-town, just not one of my current suspects.

[Mr Stoofer]

ALIGHT

--

Deadline: 9am BST Thursday 1st May.

[Surye]

need more elvis blowing up surye.

What's your problem with me? You keep popping up with this, I don't understand it.

[Quagmire]

need more elvis blowing up surye.

What's your problem with me? You keep popping up with this, I don't understand it.

he finds you suspicious; what's so hard to understand

[Surye]

need more elvis blowing up surye.

What's your problem with me? You keep popping up with this, I don't understand it.

he finds you suspicious; what's so hard to understand

I realize he finds me suspicious, I didn't ask if he HAD a problem with me, but as to WHAT it was. Your post was useless.

[Quagmire]

need more elvis blowing up surye.

What's your problem with me? You keep popping up with this, I don't understand it.

he finds you suspicious; what's so hard to understand

I realize he finds me suspicious, I didn't ask if he HAD a problem with me, but as to WHAT it was. Your post was useless.

yes. his problem with you is that he finds you suspicious. i don't see why he needs a reason for it

[NabakovNabakov]

NabNab: Should Sarc die today? Why?

What I'm looking at is a fairly isolated tell (though anything is isolated given Sarc's level of content), and I would like to see what his response is, but I would put him next to Suyre on my list of people I would like to dynamite elvis_knits. His participation has been composed of making baseless accusations and deflecting the attention those accusations bring.

[Surye]

NabNab: Should Sarc die today? Why?

What I'm looking at is a fairly isolated tell (though anything is isolated given Sarc's level of content), and I would like to see what his response is, but I would put him next to Suyre on my list of people I would like to dynamite elvis_knits. His participation has been composed of making baseless accusations and deflecting the attention those accusations bring.

I'm not deflecting the attention, I'm brining it back to the table so I can address it, I've already defended most everything thrown at me, but peg is still just posting one liners against me, and I want to address it.

Deflecting it would be posting about others, I brought up a post no one had seemed to even notice. Why would I do that if I was not confident I could address his issue?

[NabakovNabakov]

NabNab: Should Sarc die today? Why?

What I'm looking at is a fairly isolated tell (though anything is isolated given Sarc's level of content), and I would like to see what his response is, but I would put him next to Suyre on my list of people I would like to dynamite elvis_knits. His participation has been composed of making baseless accusations and deflecting the attention those accusations bring.

I'm not deflecting the attention, I'm brining it back to the table so I can address it, I've already defended most everything thrown at me, but peg is still just posting one liners against me, and I want to address it.

Deflecting it would be posting about others, I brought up a post no one had seemed to even notice. Why would I do that if I was not confident I could address his issue?

Sorry, vague pronouns/poorly conceived post. The last sentence refers to Sarcastro. I'm still waiting for you to tell me why you claimed to analyze Skitzer when all you did was rehash.

[Surye]

NabNab: Should Sarc die today? Why?

What I'm looking at is a fairly isolated tell (though anything is isolated given Sarc's level of content), and I would like to see what his response is, but I would put him next to Suyre on my list of people I would like to dynamite elvis_knits. His participation has been composed of making baseless accusations and deflecting the attention those accusations bring.

I'm not deflecting the attention, I'm brining it back to the table so I can address it, I've already defended most everything thrown at me, but peg is still just posting one liners against me, and I want to address it.

Deflecting it would be posting about others, I brought up a post no one had seemed to even notice. Why would I do that if I was not confident I could address his issue?

Sorry, vague pronouns/poorly conceived post. The last sentence refers to Sarcastro. I'm still waiting for you to tell me why you claimed to analyze Skitzer when all you did was rehash.

Ah, I see, good point. And I will do my skitzer analysis, complete with quotes when I get home from work tonight.

[pickemgenius]

need more elvis blowing up surye.

What's your problem with me? You keep popping up with this, I don't understand it.

he finds you suspicious; what's so hard to understand

I realize he finds me suspicious, I didn't ask if he HAD a problem with me, but as to WHAT it was. Your post was useless.

yes. his problem with you is that he finds you suspicious. i don't see why he needs a reason for it

quag stole like 2 posts from me. thanks alot butthead.

[pickemgenius]

@Surye- if you were able to blow someone up right now who would it be?
@Elvis- same question

[pickemgenius]

@Surye- if you were able to blow someone up right now who would it be?
@Elvis- same question

one word answers please. i'll make my own informed decision based upon your answers.

[Surye]

@Surye- if you were able to blow someone up right now who would it be?
@Elvis- same question

one word answers please. i'll make my own informed decision based upon your answers.

Yes master.

Skitzer.

[elvis_knits]

@Surye- if you were able to blow someone up right now who would it be?
@Elvis- same question

Yos or You.

I posted earlier how I didn't like you striking a light and then seeming like you never intended to blow anyone up. It seemed like you were only striking a light for show. I don't think you ever responded to me about that. Did you intend to blow anyone up the first day? Would you blow anyone up now?

I've been thinking about blowing up Yos. I really don't like it when people play the you're-smarter-than-to-vote-me card.

Although this could just be Yos's naturally pompous nature...

I don't believe CES's point that "Yos miscounted the nights in order to look pro-town" is a good scum tell at all. Which makes me feel a little stupid voting Yos. Although I still have a gut that he's scum.

I'm thinking of moving my vote (maybe to you depending what you say about my questions), and wherever I move it, you can be sure that that is the person I would blow up if the town wanted me to do so.

[skitzer]

Pinsir Pre-Evo. Incorporates parts from Kakuna and Tauros.

Code: Select all

http://i29.tinypic.com/2csdlcl.png[code]

[skitzer]

OMG Embarrassing...Totally wrong FORUM!

Mod please delete that post...I knew multitasking was a bad idea.

But since I posted, I guess I should say something...

Surye is still my biggest suspicion, and Yosarian is far behind but in second.

(i sense embarrassing custom titles emulating from the above post)

[PokerFace]

^ has good timing. Or better than mine, it appears.

Yos: No harm, no foul.

So the score so far is that all Skitzer has done is lied, mislead, and lurked?

There doesn't seem to be any analysis of your own, here. What's up with that?

I'm pretty sure that the 'appeal to emotion' is just blithe sarcasm.

Mmm. Tentative

vote

:

Erg0

.
NabNab: Should Sarc die today? Why?
Claus: Why do you believe scum would be

more

likely to be active in this environment?

Huh? First you vote marmalade with pretty much no reason, and now you vote Erg0 with absolutly no reason. And your last post had a paragraph analizing some players who were already dead.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 70#1023370
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 93#1023393
Think you can get yourself up to speed and contribute to what is actually going on now? Why Erg0 of all people?

I'm starting to develop a list of players which I believe to be scum. Elmo just got on that list with Sarcastro and Surye. Because we are nearing deadline and Erg0 is right about blowing up someone not enough people suspect, I'll be moving my vote to Surye yet still keeping an eye of Sarcastro and Elmo.

Vote: Surye

Person with highest votes should definatly strike a light by the 28th or 29th. Why must stoofer keep moving up his deadline?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current Vote Count of Day 4:

Surye - 4(PEG, Skitzer, Ergo, PokerFace)
Yosarian2 - 3(CEScum, Claus, Elvis)
Cogito Ergo Scum - 1(Yosarian2)
Sarcastro - 1(Quagmire)
Skitzer - 1(Surye)
Elvis - 1(NabNab)
Erg0 - 1(Elmo)

Not Voting - 5(Elmo, Flameaxe, Kuribo, Marmalade, Sarcastro)

16 people alive so its 9 votes needed
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Yosarian2]

@Surye- if you were able to blow someone up right now who would it be?
@Elvis- same question

one word answers please. i'll make my own informed decision based upon your answers.

Yes master.

Skitzer.

OMG Embarrassing...Totally wrong FORUM!

Mod please delete that post...I knew multitasking was a bad idea.

But since I posted, I guess I should say something...

Surye is still my biggest suspicion, and Yosarian is far behind but in second.

(i sense embarrassing custom titles emulating from the above post)

Interesting. They're both saying they're willing to blow the other one up, huh? I've got a feeling that one of them is probably bluffing.

[Marmalade]

I really don't like either or Elvis' top suspects. The Yos case is really lame, and as for Peg, striking a light for show as scummy, even though it had been highlighted by many that striking a light was scummy. Sure, it may have been for show, but I'm unsure why you consider such an action so indicative of alignment.

Further, I don't like how she says she was be willing to blow Yos up -- rash blowings up are a bad idea (surely by now this is obvious).

I like Poker's recent post, although I don't get his Sarc suspicion as much. I wouldn't oppose Surye blowing up, but I'd prefer skitzler if I had to choose between the two of them. Elmo is still striking me as suspicious because of his random Erg0 vote, and I don't like the Yos voters (particularly Claus, who keeps going after Yos

on and on and on

.

[Yosarian2]

Yeah; I'm still waiting for Claus to answer my questions and respond to my latest post. I explained why I think he's scummy, ask him to explain himself back on Wednesday, even though he's posted 7 times on other places on the site since then. With the deadline coming up, I'm really starting to wonder if he hopes he can just lay low until someone else blows somebody else up.

[Cogito Ergo Scum]

Stoof & the rest:

I'll unexpectedly be unable to post from Monday to Friday this week. Sorry for the inconvenience. I hope replacement isn't necessary, but by all means replace me if you really think it is.

[PokerFace]

Ok we need to hurry this along here. Deadline/no lynch = Bad. Some people are just saying some players are scummy while others are actually voting. Vote for whoever you think is scum NOW. Not voting at all is very bad. We all need to vote or reach some majority by late of the 28th-29th so that someone can blow up late 29-30. That way we beat the deadline for certain. Since we may not reach 9 votes, I think it may be necessary for whoever has the most (preferably majority but if not), should strike at light at or around the mentioned time. It may also be necessary for some enforcer to strike a light ahead of time to make sure things go through and we actually get a lynch. I remember Adel saying having the enforcers around to make sure a lynch goes through would be necessary.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 48#1015748
Quagmire or PEG if your willing to do that, that will be good or else I may have to do it myself.

Hmm. A vote count. Might as well post some content.

(sorry town, this game is not particularly inspiring me right now - if there is a spot open, I would like to volunteer for "strike a light police" role)...

Here claus said he might be willing to join the strike the light police or enforcers so if we can have someone on with a light struck as a precationary measure it may be good in order to make sure the two highest go off. Vote count hasn't changed and really it should for I think we need to do something.

[pickemgenius]

STRIKE A LIGHT

I feel disposable in order to blow up scum.


also Pokers last post rubs me the wrong way.

[Erg0]

Oy.

At least try to blow up the right person.