Surye wrote:My meta on skitzer says that he is just crazy enough to send a ??? action in which he tries to take the law into his hands.
Surye you are wrong, and you too are trying to cover up the untrustworthiness of the obituaries.
Surye wrote:My meta on skitzer says that he is just crazy enough to send a ??? action in which he tries to take the law into his hands.
This post is a joke.DrippingGoofball wrote:Surye wrote:My meta on skitzer says that he is just crazy enough to send a ??? action in which he tries to take the law into his hands.If he has no night action, and is vanilla, as the reveal implies, the mod should dismiss his ??? as invalid.
Surye you are wrong, and you too are trying to cover up the untrustworthiness of the obituaries.
Yes. People have a fourth action. Understand that.DrippingGoofball wrote:I don't get it. So he chose to break in???
I fully answered this question already. I was very justified to shoot Dasquian. My premise was completely faulty, but I didn't know that at the time.Natirasha wrote:Why did you shoot Dasqian? I understand he was scum and all, but...you shot him over nothing. Dude, I don't trust you.
Which is a very odd post, first, it's assuming, out of the clear blue sky, that I'm mafia, and then wanting to figure out which mafia? It's a semantic trap like "when did you stop beating your wife?"Natirasha wrote:So...I'm considering DGB not to be part of Albert's mafia, but I really don't want to get into WIFOM, which that is.
Any guesses on which mafia sydicate he's part of?
I was THAT sure that I was right, and that he was messing with me. That's how sure I was. Sure enough to shoot him down.Hjallti wrote:I also don't see any logic in Drippings' thinking.Were you expecting any?
I never read instructions.Hjallti wrote:The fact that she didn't believe the mod overrules the excuse she didn't get the '???'-action. I have to admit I had to ask myself what the ??? was about but it is on the first page.
Hjallti wrote:Shooting Dasquian was anyway not the reaction she should have as townie.
Surye, why on Earth would ANYONE investigate Dasquian???Surye wrote:My guess is you "investigated" him last night, and found a rival, and was just waiting for a moment to strike, and look half justified, and look very town.
I checked my PMs again, and the reason why I investigated skitzer was because you had asked me. And if you check your PM, you'll see that I said that I wasn't sure it wasn't going to go through because I expected to be sequestered at QB, which somehow I wasn't. Remember? So I just sent the order, and I did not ask for a report to be sent to you, because trivially, I forgot. I did receive more information than if I had sent the report, so that there is a tradeoff.Surye wrote:My meta on skitzer says that he is just crazy enough to send a ??? action in which he tries to take the law into his hands. Or do something.
I assume he was just making his list from the Town's point of view, rather than his own. Did you actually not think of that?Hjallti wrote:armlx, You actually mean you wouldn't consider yourself town without cop-confirmation?
All hail Sensfan, the answerer of obvious questions.SensFan wrote:I assume he was just making his list from the Town's point of view, rather than his own. Did you actually not think of that?Hjallti wrote:armlx, You actually mean you wouldn't consider yourself town without cop-confirmation?
Indeed - I was so incredibly sure he was town. I even visited his house last night, thinking that he would be a safe bet as a safe person to be with at night. Thankfully, he was out!DrippingGoofball wrote:Surye, why on Earth would ANYONE investigate Dasquian???Surye wrote:My guess is you "investigated" him last night, and found a rival, and was just waiting for a moment to strike, and look half justified, and look very town.
He looked very, very pro-town. Even if I were corrupt, why would I investigate Dasquian?
Singing Librarian wrote:More interestingly, has Surye simply forgotten asking DGB to investigate Skitzer, or is DGB lying about that?
Surye wrote:2) "I investigated skitzer, because I find him opaque" And it had nothing to do with my polite request to investigate him? Anyways, because I did ask that of you, if my theory was right, it'd make sense for you to call him out with a false report, this is also something that didn't comfort me.
We all know ABR was scum. I doubt a townie would self-lynch himself to avoid a reveal.DrippingGoofball wrote:I fully answered this question already. I was very justified to shoot Dasquian. My premise was completely faulty, but I didn't know that at the time.Natirasha wrote:Why did you shoot Dasqian? I understand he was scum and all, but...you shot him over nothing. Dude, I don't trust you.
Speaking of "over nothing" you wrote this:
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 12#1035612
Which is a very odd post, first, it's assuming, out of the clear blue sky, that I'm mafia, and then wanting to figure out which mafia? It's a semantic trap like "when did you stop beating your wife?"Natirasha wrote:So...I'm considering DGB not to be part of Albert's mafia, but I really don't want to get into WIFOM, which that is.
Any guesses on which mafia sydicate he's part of?
BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY...
HOW DO YOU KNOW ALBERT IS MAFIA???
He has not been revealed.
vote: NatirishaDie scum die.