Mini 578 - Mistery at Montescuro - Game Over!

[Albert B. Rampage]

Dasquian has said his peace.

Hammer please.

[Dasquian]

So you've got nothing in response, then?

[Albert B. Rampage]

Not only has Guardian been making himself scummier in my eyes since then, but the statement ABR quoted

only holds

if it's very likely ABR and Guardian cannot both be town

, a conclusion which I think is too early to draw.[/color]

You're so nervous you can't even make sense, read or quote properly. How can we take anything you say seriously ?

Near/ABR - Near basically "cleared" himself in deadline yesterday. That still holds, but doesn't totally clear ABR forever and ever. If ABR

is

scum, he's in a very strong position. Needless to say, I have far less than a favourable read on him since he's going hell-for-leather trying to get yours truly lynched. My biggest beef with him, however, is how eerily similar his play is to Guardian's. It's like he joined the game, saw that Guardian's tactics were effective and tolerated by the town, and decided to get a piece of that action. This alone makes me strongly wonder if we weren't giving Near-as-scum nearly enough credit.

This...is quite a lot of words, to say absolutely nothing. You must be cracking under pressure, Dasq.

I maintain that Dasq and DBE are tightly connected, with Yosarian as the ring leader of this happy party.

[Dasquian]

So I hit the nail on the head with your scum-hunting strategy, then? I guess this is the "accusation" bit, because it sure isn't the "evidence" bit.

[Dasquian]

Not only has Guardian been making himself scummier in my eyes since then, but the statement ABR quoted

only holds

if it's very likely ABR and Guardian cannot both be town

, a conclusion which I think is too early to draw.[/color]

You're so nervous you can't even make sense, read or quote properly. How can we take anything you say seriously ?

Ha, I only spotted what I did wrong here on the reread. I swear I have some kind of acronym-dyslexia or something.

Of course I meant "DBE and Guardian". But it's a good job everyone is giving me the benefit of the doubt and not using every little typo to prop up their otherwise shoddy case, right?

[Guardian]

Dasquian, why aren't you voting for one of the people you think are scum?

[Dasquian]

Because I thought I already was.

Vote: mikeburnfire

- it seems like the less hopeful bandwagon, but it's the better one IMO. I also wish to reread pyrodwarf's posts before dropping a vote, even though it seems more in vogue atm.

[Guardian]

Because I thought I already was.

:? Little more than a day has passed since you unvoted.

You did not recall doing so?

[Albert B. Rampage]

He's all over the place, desperately scrambling to survive; he doesn't even know what he's doing at this point.

[Dasquian]

Because I thought I already was.

Little more than a day has passed since you unvoted.

You did not recall doing so?

I thought I had actually switched my vote to Pyrodwarf rather than resolving to do a background check first (a promise I still plan to make good on). In the meantime, you're right, there's no reason not to have my vote down on someone I find scummy.

[Guardian]

If you thought you'd voted for pyrodwarf, why vote for mbf?

Why did you think you thought pyro was better a day ago, but now think mbf is better?

[Dasquian]

Because I put a lot of faith in the belief I made the right choice at the time and can't always remember why I made it You're right to call me up on this confusion, but confusion is all it is. I can tell you one thing with clarity right now though:

With the information I currently have, the votes distributed how they currently are, the fact I'm not sure how close pyrodwarf is to a lynch, and the fact I still want to reread his posts, I would rather have my vote on mbf than pyrodwarf.

You're a one to be calling people up on sporadic voting, though

[Guardian]

Because I put a lot of faith in the belief I made the right choice at the time and can't always remember why I made it ;) You're right to call me up on this confusion, but confusion is all it is. I can tell you one thing with clarity right now though

I don't find the following clear...

With the information I currently have,

the votes distributed how they currently are

,

the fact I'm not sure how close pyrodwarf is to a lynch

, and the fact I still want to reread his posts, I would rather have my vote on mbf than pyrodwarf.

...because I don't understand: How do you count both the red and the green as "information I currently have"??

You're a one to be calling people up on sporadic voting, though :)

:)

[Dasquian]

I know pyrodwarf got a couple of votes recently. I didn't count them. This is because I am lazy.

[Singing Librarian]

Unvote; vote: DarlaBlueEyes

Words cannot begin to express the scumminess of her recent posts, which holds true regardless of whether Dasquian happens to be town or scum. The 'fine, I'll vote for Dasquian to make you happy' feel to the posts is awful, as is the implication that she'd be laughing if we mislynched her.

The recent posts push her way past the 'I'd be prepared to vote for her' threshold to the 'way scummiest person' level. Ick.

[Guardian]

I know pyrodwarf got a couple of votes recently. I didn't count them. This is because I am lazy.

Pyrodwarf hasn't gotten any votes since the last vote count...

Is now really the best time to be "lazy"? You are too lazy to look through the 25 most recent posts for votes, but not to make the player by player analysis of over 500 words?

This strikes me as very odd, especially since there's been less than 25 posts since the last vote count, in none of which pyro has been voted.

First off, where are you coming from that pyro was voted?
Second off, how are you too lazy to count but not too lazy to make these posts you've been making?
Third, where are you coming from that pyro has gotten

a couple

of votes, so many that you fear voting him because you don't know how many votes are on him???

[Dasquian]

OK, so being lazy is a pretty poor show. This is what I make the current vote-count:

Dasquian 5 - ABR, Guardian, MBF, Joudas, DBE
DBE 1 - Yos2 , Mac
Pyrodwarf 1 - Singing Librarian
mbf 1 - Dasquian

Not voting:
Pyrodwarf

So my statement would be: With the information I currently have, and the fact I still want to reread pyrodwarf's posts, I would rather have my vote on mbf than pyrodwarf.

Also, please don't hammer me yet. I'm intending to properly debunk ABR's case when I get a spare moment (hopefully tomorrow morning), and I would also like anyone voting me as a proxy for DBE to

strongly

reconsider, or at least state straight up that this is waht they are doing.

[Dasquian]

Simul-post: pretty much answered all of your questions.

I should explain that work is pretty hectic atm, and that most of my posts are literally direct reactions to the last two or three I saw. Hence why I plan to do a proper rebuttal at the weekend.

[Guardian]

unvote

vote:

FOS: DBE

not sure about dasq so much. i want to prevent a hammer before I think more in any case.

dbe has been uber suspicious. but... wat if dbe is a watcher?

I'm retreating to the bat-cave.

[DarlaBlueEyes]

lol alright you say it was a scummy move, but isnt it TOO scummy? I had no idea you all would react like that. I thought I was proving myself.

Obviously you guys all stick to those little wiki rules 100%. I am new., yeah but i have my own style of play which has obv. gotten me into trouble, come what may, lynch me... I dont care If the scum wins I will LOL @ all of you for being so dumb as to lynch the tracker & watcher.

btw

unvote

wont be on tonight, so see ya later!

[Albert B. Rampage]

We could very well cut the intermediary and lynch DBE on the spot.

Unvote, vote DBE

[PyroDwarf]

Well, DBE as certainly dug herself a scum hole. Trying to "act town" is not a good thing to admit, i think. It looks like guardian and ABR went to the same scum hunting school. Pick a guy and ride them to a lynch. While this is a fine playstyle, I don't particularly care for it. Dasquian, I am almost sold on. He didn;t claim when he was at L-1, he only said he wasnt scum.
It seems he has been backed into a corner and is in survival mode. However, before i place my vote, i have to figure, Do we have a cop and a watcher, or was it a cop and a tracker. Or, was it watcher and tracker, and ballsy scum? I think it would be safest for me to vote the non PR claimed member in this, so I will

vote:Dasquian

putting him at L-1 again.

With the information I currently have, the votes distributed how they currently are, the fact I'm not sure how close pyrodwarf is to a lynch, and the fact I still want to reread his posts, I would rather have my vote on mbf than pyrodwarf

I'm pretty sure I was at one or zero votes when you said that.

s now really the best time to be "lazy"? You are too lazy to look through the 25 most recent posts for votes, but not to make the player by player analysis of over 500 words?
This strikes me as very odd, especially since there's been less than 25 posts since the last vote count, in none of which pyro has been voted.
First off, where are you coming from that pyro was voted?
Second off, how are you too lazy to count but not too lazy to make these posts you've been making?
Third, where are you coming from that pyro has gotten a couple of votes, so many that you fear voting him because you don't know how many votes are on him???

/agree

[mikeburnfire]

Actually, even with your vote, Dasquian is only at 3/6 votes, since Guardian, DBE, and ABR unvoted him. DBE, is at 4/6 however, being voted by Yos, Mac, SL, and ABR

unvote, vote: DBE

Now she is at Lynch-1

[Yosarian2]

Obviously you guys all stick to those little wiki rules 100%.

I don't think there's any "wiki rules" at all involved here, DBE. It's just that in general, pro-town people are mostly concerned with trying to find and lynch scum; scum are usually mostly concerned with not getting lynched themselves. If you vote for someone that you don't think is really scummy, just to make yourself look less scummy, when you weren't really in any danger, it's a scummy looking move.

I am new., yeah but i have my own style of play which has obv. gotten me into trouble, come what may, lynch me

Well, if you weren't new, you'd probably be better at hiding your scummy motivations. In any case, new or not, we have to use your posts to try and figure out your alignment.

... I dont care If the scum wins I will LOL @ all of you for being so dumb as to lynch the tracker & watcher.

Lol...oh, WE were so dumb as to lynch the tracker? Funny, that's not how I remember day 1...

[Guardian]

<--- temptation to hammer DBE.