Not saying it's 100% you're scum, but close.
Not Voting - 5 (q21, Litral, Muerrto, shaka!!, Super Archivist)
Earlier post:q21 wrote:I thought it was implicit from the fact that I stated that I suspect you most that I'd rather lynch you. I never said that carrying out that strategy then and there was good -actually I think I said that lynching either of you before others contributed would be bad... yep, I did. I did say in an earlier post that if some of the other ICs arrived and agreed I'd probably go along with it.I'd still like to know what the other ICs think of the strategy.
In answer, no I will not offer an explanation as to why I think the strategy isgood, I don't really. I've agreed that the confirmed innocence of one of yourself or Muerrto would point at the other. I have never agreed that we should just lynch one of you straight away to find out. If the day progresses without anyone else looking scummy then it possibly becomes an option... but not yet.
Possible scum translation: Okay, this is really good for me. But I need one more person for this to work. Hey, massive has been posting lately, I'll try to get him to go along with the plan. Now to say something so they won't suspect my bandwagoning.q21 wrote:I agree that you idea is essentiallysound. BUT I don't want to go into day 3 with some people having hardly checked in, let alone contributed.If massive also agrees I would probably go through with it.
You underlined good like it was me saying that it was good, but the next few words in the sentence go on to say that that is not in fact what I thought. Maybe that sentence should have been written like this: "In answer, no I will not offer an explanation as to why I think the strategy is good, because I don't really think it is good.Litral wrote:Well, the point has been done to death, really.
Your explaining post:q21 wrote:I thought it was implicit from the fact that I stated that I suspect you most that I'd rather lynch you. I never said that carrying out that strategy then and there was good -actually I think I said that lynching either of you before others contributed would be bad... yep, I did. I did say in an earlier post that if some of the other ICs arrived and agreed I'd probably go along with it.I'd still like to know what the other ICs think of the strategy.
In answer, no I will not offer an explanation as to why I think the strategy isgood, I don't really. I've agreed that the confirmed innocence of one of yourself or Muerrto would point at the other. I have never agreed that we should just lynch one of you straight away to find out. If the day progresses without anyone else looking scummy then it possibly becomes an option... but not yet.
TheLitral wrote:Possible scum translation: Okay, this is really good for me. But I need one more person for this to work. Hey, massive has been posting lately, I'll try to get him to go along with the plan. Now to say something so they won't suspect my bandwagoning.q21 wrote:I agree that you idea is essentiallysound. BUT I don't want to go into day 3 with some people having hardly checked in, let alone contributed.If massive also agrees I would probably go through with it.
Possible townie translation: They're fighting too hard, it's likely one of them is scum trying to lynch a townie. Okay, let's lynch both of them, we must certainly hit the scum then.
Either is possible.