No it's just that Adel talks about code claiming quite often, was curious where it came from, that's all.Surye wrote:I thought code in that sense was to signal other members, this is just a one-way function to prove shared knowledge later.shaft.ed wrote:Surye when did you start using code in mafia games?
If this is against the rules or sotg, I apologize and will correct it if I can, I just thought it was okay.
shaft.ed wrote:No it's just that Adel talks about code claiming quite often, was curious where it came from, that's all.Surye wrote:I thought code in that sense was to signal other members, this is just a one-way function to prove shared knowledge later.shaft.ed wrote:Surye when did you start using code in mafia games?
If this is against the rules or sotg, I apologize and will correct it if I can, I just thought it was okay.
)
The more important factors for me are that 1) Ecto was, as far as I am concerned, scummy as all hell (not your fault, but you still pay the price for the actions of your predecessor) and 2) I can't see another good preexisting wagon at this point (I have explained why the other three wagons are bad, and I know of no reason why your lynch would be as bad as the three I mentioned), and with deadline a preexisting wagon is our best bet IMO.Gorrad wrote:Joyous, so the one point against me specifically is that I bandwagoned. That's easily explainable, I actually took good notes during this readthrough. Therefore, because I had notes on hand, I was comfortable voting those I mentioned as scummy. Typically, I don't have notes nearly as good at this, so I'll find one very scummy player and not remember much about others. Not exactly a good strategy, hence the change. Other points I can't defend against, as I didn't cause them.
Also, as much as I hate to admit it, Tar's second paragraph does make sense. He didn't mention the posibility of him being lynched, naturally, but too many people seem to have fallen for Xtoxm's fakeclaim for an Xtoxm lynch to be viable. Ah well, we'll see.
I apologize for following a hunch. Would you rather me not contribute as it seems most others are more than willing to do?Tar wrote:In other news, shaft.ed just took a HUGE jump onto my scumdar for his new crypto tangent (which feels REALLY odd to me - it looks like an attack, but shaft.ed's heart doesn't seem to be in it... possible Information Instead of Analysis?). I need to do a fast read and compare his play here to his play in Open 57 (where he was scum).
How does one blatanly derail a wagon for townie points? If the wagon is derailed you only get the townie points when said townie is deceased. Seems a bit off to me.Finally, as for shaft.ed's question: An Adel/Ecto scumpair could have derailed the Surye wagon for townie points.
Agreed, Surye did you not see this question? Please answer.Tar wrote:I won't consider him completely clear unless I hear that the masons are confirmed innocent
If your claim is truthful you should know that lynching Xtoxm is suboptimal. Also a SK investigator without a SK could make sense in this particular game.Gorrad wrote:L-2 = claim time. I'm an overeager vig. Must kill every night, cannot target self. I killed Adel. I stated much suspicion of her before night, and it payed off. That's why I don't believe Xtoxm. It's possible that there's a SK, but I highly doubt it. Scum would see that kill, assume SK, and claim accordingly. Simple, neh?
The fact that I'm claiming this also negates any allegations of my being partnered with Adel. If I was, then I could be counter-claimed. I won't be, therefore that bit of suspicion should be dropped immeadiately, thank you Tar.
Tar and Xtoxm are top of my list. If I survive today, I'll gaurantee one dead tomorrow (so you can be assured it's not a one-shot ability). Now, can we lynch Xtoxm please?
I have some difficulty buying this, but it is *potentially* consistent with what I know.Gorrad wrote:L-2 = claim time. I'm an overeager vig. Must kill every night, cannot target self. I killed Adel. I stated much suspicion of her before night, and it payed off. That's why I don't believe Xtoxm. It's possible that there's a SK, but I highly doubt it. Scum would see that kill, assume SK, and claim accordingly. Simple, neh?
The fact that I'm claiming this also negates any allegations of my being partnered with Adel. If I was, then I could be counter-claimed. I won't be, therefore that bit of suspicion should be dropped immeadiately, thank you Tar.
Tar and Xtoxm are top of my list. If I survive today, I'll gaurantee one dead tomorrow (so you can be assured it's not a one-shot ability). Now, can we lynch Xtoxm please?