Mini 584: Sudo_Nym Presents- Over!


User avatar
Sir Tornado
Sir Tornado
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Sir Tornado
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2255
Joined: May 17, 2007

Post Post #600 (ISO) » Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:49 am

Post by Sir Tornado »

icemanE wrote:Gosh darn, I've never seen a replacement turn my opinion of the original player around so quickly. I don't particularly remember Cake doing anything all that scummy - I do remember that he was the first person I was even remotely suspicious of bu that was very early in the game. Looks like its time for a reread, I'll probably be done in a few hours, maybe later tonight.
I replaced Nanosauromo...

b/w = bandwagon. I tend to use that when I am posting from my cell phone.
I'm back!
User avatar
icemanE
icemanE
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
icemanE
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2361
Joined: March 31, 2008

Post Post #601 (ISO) » Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:52 am

Post by icemanE »

I replaced Nanosauromo...
O right, my bad. Reread still in progress, thanks for the correction.
User avatar
icemanE
icemanE
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
icemanE
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2361
Joined: March 31, 2008

Post Post #602 (ISO) » Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:14 am

Post by icemanE »

Nano wrote:Hi guys, sorry for not posting much yet.

Reading over the game, Zeek really jumps out at me as being scummy.
Well unfortunately, replacing Nano makes a pre-replacement read pretty much impossible, since there's nearly nothing to read. The above quote is all I could find worth noting.
Sir T wrote:Iceman, I thing you are scum due to the nature of your arguments with Zeek on D1. Your case on him was based on a number of non scummy goof ups by Zeek. It was too opportunistic.
I know you aren't him, but your partner's only real post was infinitely less reasoned and more "opportunistic" than my case against Zeek - I'd say the only thing opportunistic about my suspicion of Zeek is that I took the opportunity to be suspicious of him because he was incredibly suspicious?
User avatar
TheSweatpantsNinja
TheSweatpantsNinja
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TheSweatpantsNinja
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1819
Joined: October 15, 2007

Post Post #603 (ISO) » Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:06 am

Post by TheSweatpantsNinja »

Unsurprisingly, I agree with most everything tornado has to say. Iceman is scum, FL is town.

My reasons for voting iceman may be different, but my conclusions are the same.
User avatar
icemanE
icemanE
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
icemanE
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2361
Joined: March 31, 2008

Post Post #604 (ISO) » Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:34 am

Post by icemanE »

Sir T are you seriously away until the 11th. :(
User avatar
FaerieLord
FaerieLord
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
FaerieLord
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1599
Joined: March 23, 2007
Location: In an Octupus' Garden

Post Post #605 (ISO) » Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:41 am

Post by FaerieLord »

He has been so for a while. It's what is limiting his posting
(1:07:08 AM) Xdaamno: alcohol
(1:07:11 AM) Xdaamno: solves this problem
(1:07:13 AM) Xdaamno: woohoo
User avatar
Sudo_Nym
Sudo_Nym
Pseudo Newbie
User avatar
User avatar
Sudo_Nym
Pseudo Newbie
Pseudo Newbie
Posts: 1144
Joined: March 12, 2007
Location: Washington

Post Post #606 (ISO) » Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:14 am

Post by Sudo_Nym »

Vote Count:

icemanE 4
-
TheSweatpantsNinja, Lowell, Thestatusquo, Sir Tornado

Lowell 2-
icemanE, Greasy Spot

Celebloki 1-
Johoohno


With 11 alive, 6 will lynch.

This is what happens when I do match too early in the morning. Sorry iceman.
Last edited by Sudo_Nym on Mon Jun 02, 2008 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
One time, back in 'nam, Sudo was set upon by an entire squadron of charlies. He challenged them all to a game of Pictionary, which he won resoundingly. The charlies were forced to not only surrender the skirmish, but also their world-famous chili recipe, which Sudo sold to Texas for a hefty profit. Sudo is a master of diplomacy.
User avatar
icemanE
icemanE
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
icemanE
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2361
Joined: March 31, 2008

Post Post #607 (ISO) » Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:19 am

Post by icemanE »

Huh, didn't realize I was on L-1. In case anybody decides to pull a GS, I believe I have already claimed vanilla townie, but there it is in case I haven't, and seriously, keep your eyes on Lowell or it will come back to haunt you.
User avatar
TDC
TDC
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TDC
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2108
Joined: January 25, 2008
Location: Berlin, Germany

Post Post #608 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 12:46 am

Post by TDC »

Shouldn't that be "With 11 alive, 6 will lynch"? You're at L-2 then..

Still waiting for Celebloki and Surye to say whether either of them is the doc.
User avatar
icemanE
icemanE
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
icemanE
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2361
Joined: March 31, 2008

Post Post #609 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:45 am

Post by icemanE »

Shouldn't that be "With 11 alive, 6 will lynch"? You're at L-2 then..

I think the mod wants me dead.
User avatar
Surye
Surye
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Surye
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2330
Joined: December 23, 2007
Location: San Diego, CA

Post Post #610 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:57 am

Post by Surye »

TDC wrote:Shouldn't that be "With 11 alive, 6 will lynch"? You're at L-2 then..

Still waiting for Celebloki and Surye to say whether either of them is the doc.
Still working on my analysis. FWIW, GS and Iceman have my FoS, but I looked back at the last few pages, and see we're all claiming not-doc, so I indeed am not.
User avatar
icemanE
icemanE
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
icemanE
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2361
Joined: March 31, 2008

Post Post #611 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:34 am

Post by icemanE »

OK then, has everyone claimed not-doc? Are we done doubting the claim now?
User avatar
Surye
Surye
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Surye
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2330
Joined: December 23, 2007
Location: San Diego, CA

Post Post #612 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:51 am

Post by Surye »

We still need to hear from Celeb.
User avatar
Johoohno
Johoohno
He
16777215 km/h
User avatar
User avatar
Johoohno
He
16777215 km/h
16777215 km/h
Posts: 1166
Joined: October 22, 2007
Pronoun: He
Location: Sweden

Post Post #613 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:22 am

Post by Johoohno »

Surye wrote:Still working on my analysis. FWIW, GS and Iceman have my FoS, but I looked back at the last few pages, and see we're all claiming not-doc, so I indeed am not.
Is your FoS on GS to be understood as doubting his claim?
User avatar
Surye
Surye
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Surye
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2330
Joined: December 23, 2007
Location: San Diego, CA

Post Post #614 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:24 am

Post by Surye »

Johoohno wrote:
Surye wrote:Still working on my analysis. FWIW, GS and Iceman have my FoS, but I looked back at the last few pages, and see we're all claiming not-doc, so I indeed am not.
Is your FoS on GS to be understood as doubting his claim?
No, it's based on early play, like I said, I'm not done yet.
User avatar
Greasy Spot
Greasy Spot
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Greasy Spot
Goon
Goon
Posts: 858
Joined: January 3, 2008
Location: On the floor

Post Post #615 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:29 am

Post by Greasy Spot »

So what if Celeb does claim doc? How are you gonna prove he is being truthful?
User avatar
FaerieLord
FaerieLord
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
FaerieLord
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1599
Joined: March 23, 2007
Location: In an Octupus' Garden

Post Post #616 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:46 am

Post by FaerieLord »

Because if you turn out doc, we lynch him tomorrow.

It's that simple
(1:07:08 AM) Xdaamno: alcohol
(1:07:11 AM) Xdaamno: solves this problem
(1:07:13 AM) Xdaamno: woohoo
User avatar
Greasy Spot
Greasy Spot
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Greasy Spot
Goon
Goon
Posts: 858
Joined: January 3, 2008
Location: On the floor

Post Post #617 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:31 am

Post by Greasy Spot »

FaerieLord wrote:Because if you turn out doc, we lynch him tomorrow.

It's that simple
Yes, I understand that but how does that disprove my claim for today? It seems like people are waiting to see if someone counter claims, but I'm wondering how are people going to know who is truthful and who is lying?
User avatar
FaerieLord
FaerieLord
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
FaerieLord
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1599
Joined: March 23, 2007
Location: In an Octupus' Garden

Post Post #618 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:52 am

Post by FaerieLord »

We won't know who is truthful. But if you are truthful, we can lynch the other one tomorrow

One scum is what you can ask for from any power role
(1:07:08 AM) Xdaamno: alcohol
(1:07:11 AM) Xdaamno: solves this problem
(1:07:13 AM) Xdaamno: woohoo
User avatar
icemanE
icemanE
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
icemanE
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2361
Joined: March 31, 2008

Post Post #619 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:21 am

Post by icemanE »

Greasy Spot wrote:
FaerieLord wrote:Because if you turn out doc, we lynch him tomorrow.

It's that simple
Yes, I understand that but how does that disprove my claim for today? It seems like people are waiting to see if someone counter claims, but I'm wondering how are people going to know who is truthful and who is lying?
Hmm... Grease, this is really shaking my confidence in the truth behind your claim...
User avatar
Thestatusquo
Thestatusquo
He/Him
Shea

User avatar
User avatar
Thestatusquo
He/Him
Shea

Shea

Posts: 14372
Joined: July 27, 2006
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: Chicago!

Post Post #620 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:24 am

Post by Thestatusquo »

In general, a counter claim is more likely to be believed than the original claim, mainly because there is less motivation for a scum to counterclaim out of the blue than there is for them to try to fake claim to save their skin; the one for one trade just isnt worth it for them. Therefore scum are more likely to be the one fake claiming than the one counterclaiming.

Couple that with the fact that you were the most suspicious before you claimed, and they were not, I think it's pretty safe to say that any counter claim comes along and it will be you we're hanging.
tout comprendre c'est tout pardonner
User avatar
Greasy Spot
Greasy Spot
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Greasy Spot
Goon
Goon
Posts: 858
Joined: January 3, 2008
Location: On the floor

Post Post #621 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:36 am

Post by Greasy Spot »

Thestatusquo wrote:In general, a counter claim is more likely to be believed than the original claim, mainly because there is less motivation for a scum to counterclaim out of the blue than there is for them to try to fake claim to save their skin; the one for one trade just isnt worth it for them. Therefore scum are more likely to be the one fake claiming than the one counterclaiming.

Couple that with the fact that you were the most suspicious before you claimed, and they were not, I think it's pretty safe to say that any counter claim comes along and it will be you we're hanging.
With only one more person left to claim he could claim the same as me since I already said what I did. How are you to know if he is lying? Well technically the only way you will know is if he survives the NK and I don't. Other than that he can say what he wants and your at his mercy. You can't disprove him and he gets to survive another lynch (not saying celeb would be the lynch). You are putting too much faith in his words. If he claims doc and you lynch me then you are at a disadvantage going into the night and the next day. If you concentrate on mafia during the day they will most likely target me at night so as to not risk another successful protection.
icemanE wrote:
Greasy Spot wrote:
FaerieLord wrote:Because if you turn out doc, we lynch him tomorrow.

It's that simple
Yes, I understand that but how does that disprove my claim for today? It seems like people are waiting to see if someone counter claims, but I'm wondering how are people going to know who is truthful and who is lying?
Hmm... Grease, this is really shaking my confidence in the truth behind your claim...
How so?
User avatar
icemanE
icemanE
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
icemanE
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2361
Joined: March 31, 2008

Post Post #622 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:41 am

Post by icemanE »

GS wrote: How so?
These questions you're asking make is seem like you're worried about someone CC'ing, which you shouldn't be if you're really doc.
User avatar
Greasy Spot
Greasy Spot
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Greasy Spot
Goon
Goon
Posts: 858
Joined: January 3, 2008
Location: On the floor

Post Post #623 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:43 am

Post by Greasy Spot »

icemanE wrote:
GS wrote: How so?
These questions you're asking make is seem like you're worried about someone CC'ing, which you shouldn't be if you're really doc.
No I worried that everyone else is putting too much emphasis on the CC. They have no way of knowing for sure till the dust settles.
User avatar
icemanE
icemanE
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
icemanE
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2361
Joined: March 31, 2008

Post Post #624 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:48 am

Post by icemanE »

Greasy Spot wrote:
icemanE wrote:
GS wrote: How so?
These questions you're asking make is seem like you're worried about someone CC'ing, which you shouldn't be if you're really doc.
No I worried that everyone else is putting too much emphasis on the CC. They have no way of knowing for sure till the dust settles.
Right, but you have no reason to worry unless someone CC's, which no one has yet. Everyone is claiming not-doc in order to verify you as doc but you're still worried, which makes me uneasy.

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”