Let's see how this plays out.
Abstract Actuary - 1 (goborage)
Grum - 1 (springlullaby)
The World No.1 Noob - 1 (Dave)
Not Voting - 3 (Abstract Actuary, Grum, Mokina)
goborage FoS Cat_Killer for bandwagoning,Cat_Killer (10) wrote:It's [ and ] you need around tags.goborage wrote:Hey folks. <b>vote: no lynch</b> Can't we all get along?
UnvoteJust for the fail
Vote: Goborage
Cat_Killer responds by unvoting quickly and not bringing up the issue again.goborage (14) wrote:There are 2 mafia. Anyways FOS on Cat for bandwagoning (correct use of term?).
She realizes she made a mistake and wants it to go away?Cat_Killer [in 16, just 1 hour later] wrote:Unvote
I'm tired and going to sleep. I will make further random accusations or actually play seriously tomorrow, when I'm awake.
Grum is the next to post and this is what he says.rolandofthewhite (65) wrote:A bandwagon is when people start jumping on a person trying to lynch them. And my theory is that THAT is why Mafiamurkrow hasn't gotten more votes. An unexperienced mafia would probably try to jump on his vote and get him quickly lynched. But if he is mafia, his partner surely wouldn't want to vote for him.The World No.1 Noob wrote:wait rolandof, can u expland on the bandwagon thing? y would a mafia kill its own wouldn't that mean he'll have one less political ally? and I how come Mafiamurkrow hasn't made a post in a while?
A bit WIFOMy but I think newb scum may attempt to pull this off.Grum [in 66, 30 minutes later] wrote:well then i'll do it cuz he need to post soon again anyway and at this point i don't care for him because hes a pokemon luber! terrible reason alone but hes been inactive. also i'm not his partner, if bandwagon was the reason behind everything no one would be lynched, and he lurks.
vote mafiamurkrow
---Grum (116) wrote:I don't know that just seems like hes being a valuable player to me. while it does set up murkrow to be on defensive, it is seemingly an effective way to get people to talk... if he throws accusations out there at random (not naming anyone rolandofthewhite...). my current thought is that abstract is really the most valuable player at the moment, calm and collect.
also i have to say your comment is rather funny...followed in the same post by:This is finger-pointing, an attempt to make Mafiamurkrow look scummy.fingers everywhere!!FOS: Abstract Actuary
Grum (119) wrote:what about 2 goons, sane doc, sane cop, 5 town?
thats my guess...
Underlined, mine. If he is mafia and they didn't pass, then he already knows the exact setup. This could be to throw us off the setup or because he knows it to be true and it was a slip.Grum (140) wrote:Sorry about that I did overreact there I think progresive observation and logical claims is the correct way to win not just pointing fingers at people because their confused...
Any how I'll try not to leave words uncapitalized. So whos been absent from the forums it seems like( aside from those on vacation like cat killa) people are lurking around here. lets assume that we have a doc and a cop, and then we can progress.
And later she is the one to drop the premature hammer.The World No.1 Noob (84) wrote:april 19th, well thats not too bad we still got 10 days to gather as much info as we can.
However, I've gotten a very strong town read on her other than this instance.The World No.1 Noob (89) wrote:I agree with that, I'm not actually 100% sure she's mafia because her replies are too mafiaish, wouldn't a real mafia have thought up a better plan? But as camisade said her attitude is anti townie and its better to kill her to make things easier for the townies
vote: MafiamurkrowFixed - Vel
goborage (142) wrote:I'm not going to apologize for pointing fingers at people. No one here is scum-hunting and that's a problem. The issue isn't me being too aggressive, it's you being too passive.Grum wrote:Sorry about that I did overreact there I think progresive observation and logical claims is the correct way to win not just pointing fingers at people because their confused...
I agree there is a lot of inactivity here. But you can't complain about it when you do nothing to stop it. Lead by example and post questions/ suspicions. The more you post and the more questions you direct at people, the less people can lurk and get away with it.Grum wrote:Any how I'll try not to leave words uncapitalized. So whos been absent from the forums it seems like( aside from those on vacation like cat killa) people are lurking around here. lets assume that we have a doc and a cop, and then we can progress.
@ Grum: Why would you assume we have a doctor and a cop?
@ everyone: In order to promote discussion I think we should all post the most suspicious people on our lists and the reasons for them.
I'll start. Everyone on MM's bandwagon should be under scrutiny, including me. Chances are at least one of them are scum. The problem I find is that lynching MM seemed so justifiable. Most of the votes seem to have been made in earnest because of MM's frustrating playstyle. The only outliers I see are:
1. Abstract Actuary: Wasn't actually on MM's bandwagon but was in my eyes, pro-lynch. His summary of MM's actions gives license to #1noob to hammer.
2. #1noob: Did not object to MM's playstyle at all prior to the hammer and hammered MM very quickly thereby not allowing for a roleclaim. His only defense? "o, sry"
These two are the most suspicious in my eyes. Looking forward to seeing everyone else's
camisade (106) wrote:We didn't get anything relevant out of her ever, even when she was at L-1. All she posted was BS. Why sign up if you're not going to play the game?goborage wrote:These two are the most suspicious in my eyes:
camisade - sends mafiamurkrow to -1, "I agree. Or just lynch her because I've gotten sick of her BS." Seems to be pushing for a quick-lynch.
The World No.1 Noob - hammers mafiamurkrow without allowing a role-claim. Claims townie even though he isn't the one under suspicion - over-defensive.
About the no nightkill: Are mafia obliged to kill someone nightly or should we assume that a doctor miraculously saved a townie?
No nightkill: I've read a game before where a lone Mafia claimed doctor and chose to forgo night killing and bluffed by saying that he protected someone. So I'm guessing Mafia is allowed to do that, but maybe it varies from mod to mod. I'm not sure
goborage suggests (I think jokingly) that there was no night kill because the mafia didn't send in a kill. This implies that the inactive people are the mafia. The most inactive person has been Dave. His response to the goborage post is really telling, in my opinion.Dave (209) wrote:Or it was a trick Perhaps, players that have been consistently active throughtout the game, are the mafia, and did not send in the night action to frame the less active players with a post like this.goborage wrote:I think I figured out why there was no NK. The scum were too inactive to send one in by the deadline.
Fos: Goborage
I also get a slight sense of "annoyed partner" from this post.Grum (271) wrote:No, hes straight up lurking and I've been hoping he would stop if he was newb town... hes looking very scummy but I'm not looking forward to another day 1. So I'm holding off just now but hes the number 1 scummiest right next to me... wait...
Beautiful. I completely missed that, but the post speaks volumes about Dave's strategy of "active lurking" in this game.
Well there isn't much in game stuff to analyze on Dave. There is the "awesome" post following the no night kill. In all honesty though, I had no reason to think he was scum until I read this post.
Dave (209) wrote:goborage wrote:
I think I figured out why there was no NK. The scum were too inactive to send one in by the deadline.
Or it was a trick Perhaps, players that have been consistently active throughtout the game, are the mafia, and did not send in the night action to frame the less active players with a post like this.
Fos: Goborage
goborage suggests (I think jokingly) that there was no night kill because the mafia didn't send in a kill. This implies that the inactive people are the mafia. The most inactive person has been Dave. His response to the goborage post is really telling, in my opinion.
"her"...I'm a guy, a male, apart from Mokina everyone here is...However, I've gotten a very strong town read on her other than this instance.
Yea that is a very good point, but I think we should hold off on the voting because he's gonna get replaced, when the replacement comes it'll give us more information to work with.Beautiful. I completely missed that, but the post speaks volumes about Dave's strategy of "active lurking" in this game.
Also a valid approach. I'm not going to vote until Dave's replacement shows up. Whoever it is, they better have aYea that is a very good point, but I think we should hold off on the voting because he's gonna get replaced, when the replacement comes it'll give us more information to work with.
Mokina, do you think it is possible for Dave's replacement to explain Dave's actions to us?Mokina wrote: Also a valid approach. I'm not going to vote until Dave's replacement shows up. Whoever it is, they better have adamngood explanation for why Dave failed to contribute anything to the town but still responded to prods.
To be honest, no... but it may be a Dave-specific issue. Maybe he just doesn't know how to play Mafia. This is a newbie game, after all.Mokina, do you think it is possible for Dave's replacement to explain Dave's actions to us?
I misunderstood the post a little bit, and I don't suspect such a connection. Actually, the fact that you've chosen someone and pressured them to the end makes you look protown in my eyes. New-scum vote-hop opportunistically, and we can hardly accuse you of that!The whole Dave/me connection is also pretty weak imo. It's a knee-jerk reaction to my pressuring AA to post. I think the thread can handle more than one conversation.
And now that I've taken a look at the vote count, gobo is the one that first voted for A.A, looks like you're trying to buddy with him and use his pro-town image in my opinion.1) I do not endorse a Goborage lynch today, he reads town.
You may be onto something, Noob! Goborage has been actively scumhunting, and furthermore he's focused his attention on a single player. It would be a good move for any scum to ally with Goborage during the day, since he as a very good reputation with the town and has historically helped those who agree with him.The World No.1 Noob wrote:SL:
I kinda agree with post 339, A.A's posts seem to draw at straws, really random can't even remember the post he made that you gave the link to but his recent post, post 330, is really grabbing thin air as well. However I do think voting for him straight away is a bit hasty. You've also set a very good relationship with gobo, he wasn't in any danger of getting lynched, nobody's was suspicous of him (well at least I'm not) so why the:
And now that I've taken a look at the vote count, gobo is the one that first voted for A.A, looks like you're trying to buddy with him and use his pro-town image in my opinion.1) I do not endorse a Goborage lynch today, he reads town.
Sorry about that. Cat_Killer was a girl, I believe, and I guess I confused your genders.The World No.1 Noob wrote:"her"...I'm a guy, a male, apart from Mokina everyone here is...However, I've gotten a very strong town read on her other than this instance.
This is a strange reaction and a very strange first point to make. There is essentially no pressure for a goborage lynch at all. Most people think he is town and only myself and Grum have expressed any suspicion of goborage.springlullaby wrote:1) I do not endorse a Goborage lynch today, he reads town.
For a while I thought so too. His wild attacking play is not typical of newb-scum and I was getting a strong town read. But as it continued I began to realize that his attacks were pretty chaotic and weak and he was actually disrupting more than he was helping. Especially during the Dave standoff.springlullaby wrote:1) I do not endorse a Goborage lynch today, he reads town.
I agree that the strongest characteristic of Grum's play so far is newb, which could lead someone to believe his alignment is a crapshoot. But it also stinks of newb-scum. Please reread Claus and my case against him or more importantly reread Grum's play as a whole.springlullaby wrote:2) I think a Grum lynch is a weak lynch, as his alignement is totally crapshot at this point.
I'm not sure what you mean here or what your point is - especially the second part of your sentence. I think the first part is saying that you think Dave's alignment is also a crapshoot? I can understand that more. I felt the same way until I reread the thread. I think his reaction to goborage's joke about the no-night-kill outed him. Also, his continued active lurking after we told him numerous times that it was anti-town does not bode well for him.springlullaby wrote:Dave fall into the same category to a lesser extent, as his non vote day one is a little more suspicious.
The point of the questions were the make Noob rethink what he was saying and put it in his own words. His previous post just seemed to be a weak attempt at supporting the goborage attack on me without really thinking about it himself. I wanted to force him to actually read through the whole discussion and give his opinion on every aspect which wouldn't allow him to simply restate a previous comments by someone else. He responded and it seemed as though he actually read through the whole discussion the second time and I thought it correctly adjusted his opinion of the situation. I didn't think a response was necessary.springlullaby wrote:3)FOS AA
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 80#1036180
I don't like the questions at the bottom of that post, they are numerous but also quite confusing, and more importantly, AA doesn't seem to show actual interest in the answers he got. I think it's highly probable AA is just throwing up questions out there to look town.
Really? Why? What have they done that makes you think they are not scum buddies? But you think a scum IC would come to that conclusion? That is what you are implying. I'd like to hear why you think a scum IC would come to that conclusion.springlullaby wrote:Plus, in regard to his last post, I highly doubt that a town IC would come to the conclusion that Grum and Dave are scum together.
This is a pretty extreme reaction to your initial string of thoughts and makes you seem desperate, although I'm not sure why you would be at this point. camisade wasn't facing much pressure at all. Although he was probably the consensus 3rd best pick for scum at this point. What is your case against me? The things you laid out above are at best a criticism of my scum finding abilities. Nothing that points to me being scum.springlullaby wrote:In factUnvote, Vote: Abstract Actuary.
Really? You'd lynch me right now? You think I'm scum? I know you've been pretty focused on pressuring me and you're obviouslygoborage wrote:Wow an AA-lynch supporter. I've been alone for so long.
Just because you did a weak job at protecting him doesn't mean the connection is weak. And I would argue that you didn't do a weak job at all. He was acting really scummy. You pointed out some reasons why with FoS. He may have received a vote or two at that time (not sure if he actually did), but he was never in danger of a lynch back then. And he took your advice. The focus wasn't on him again until very recently.goborage wrote:Anyways I think the Grum/me connection is pretty weak. If I was trying to protect him then I did a pretty bad job as Grum has been voted for. Regarding the whole FoS thing, I've explained earlier that it was just a way to get Grum to post. Atm, no, I do not think Grum is scum.
No, it's not a knee-jerk reaction at all. I was genuinely surprised that you didn't understand the situation. I agree in almost all cases it is completely fine for the town to have multiple conversations. In fact, it is beneficial. But when we have a player who is openly and actively lurking the town has to force him to post. Starting other conversations and pressuring other people allows that player to continue to lurk. It allows him to be forgotten about. The town had decided it was time for Dave to actually play or be lynched or replaced.goborage wrote:The whole Dave/me connection is also pretty weak imo. It's a knee-jerk reaction to my pressuring AA to post. I think the thread can handle more than one conversation.
Well, vote hopping can be scummy, but focusing on just one player can be even more scummy. Especially when that player isn't facing other pressure. It is the perfect way for scum to leave very little trail. For instance, lets say goborage dies today and he is scum. Most of his posts have been attacking me and it makes it tougher for us to find his partner among the other players.Mokina wrote:I misunderstood the post a little bit, and I don't suspect such a connection. Actually, the fact that you've chosen someone and pressured them to the end makes you look protown in my eyes. New-scum vote-hop opportunistically, and we can hardly accuse you of that!The whole Dave/me connection is also pretty weak imo. It's a knee-jerk reaction to my pressuring AA to post. I think the thread can handle more than one conversation.
I don't think a replacement has been found, yet.Mokina wrote:I think we can obtain quite a bit of information from a Dave lynch. I'm not sure who's replacing him, but they've been prodded by now and it looks like they're following the same pattern. Dave's a much safer lynch for today than anyone else here.
Vote: Dave