Both.guardian wrote:Wait... you still think Imat/Guardian is scum, or you still think massive is scum? Which?
I made a long post explaining my vote switch from coolbot to eljcko. If you want me to, I can quote the bits where I justify my switch and explain. All that, along with the whole massive thing i mentioned and the fact that my vote was going nowhere prompted the switch. If you think I didn't justify the switch enough earlier on, I'd like to know why.guardian wrote:Actions speak louder than words.
You made a solid case on CoolBot early day one, then unvoted a few posts later, and never voted him again, instead leading a wagon on ejlicko, townie. If you are scum, you distanced with him while making cases on a townie, Coolbot//ejlicko.
You're accusing me of doing the same thing with massive//Qman, and we don't even know the alignment of either.
We DO know the alignment of both the player you made a secondary case on yesterday, and the player you ended up voting.
How are you not setting a double standard by saying your actions are not scummy, but mine are? Especially since we know the alignments of the players your actions involved but don't know mine...?
I agree it's a double standard. I can't help that it appears that way. But it being a double standard doesn't remove the possibility. And yes, it doesn't remove the possibility of your accusation either.
One post prompted a whole day's worth of defending? You don't just stick your neck out to defend people. Hence why hardly anyone bothered. Except for Imat. Also:guardian wrote:His looking further into coolbot was directly prompted by your own 141... Imat noticed you were strongly attacking coolbot and decided to look into him...
Imat was... you know... commenting on what other people's cases... playing the game... scum hunting...
So saying that he was unprompted in looking at Coolbot is false.
Not something you'd expect? Why not? More on this next post.
[quote="ting]Now, you could argue that Imat was just being a good townie defending people who's case on them he didn't agree with, but then - why hasn't he been bothered to look at khel, he was under way more pressure than coolbot throughout the whole day?[/quote]
It doesn't change the question - Why defend coolbot? There are other people under more heat. Coolbot was not in the spotlight. If he had limited time and resources, why coolbot?guardian wrote:Limited time and resources?
Yes, because mafia obviously don't care about their godfather very much. You're wifomming. You can't ignore a possibility because you think it sounds simple/insert occam's razor argument here.guardian wrote:So those two are his buddies huh, the two that defended him? Very doubtful. Oh, were mafia that simple.
I wasn't looking at time stamps. Fair enough.guardian wrote:Also note how Coolbot was under more pressure when Imat entered the game, and Imat was more active when he entered the game?
He was getting less and less involved and eventually replaced out at the time ejlicko was getting attacked. He made roughly the same [proportion of posts about ejlico/total posts by him in the time period] as he did [proportion of posts about Coolbot/total posts by him in the time period]. Why did you ignore this?
Still doesn't change though, that out of ALL the players who've been under attack at some point - Imat defends only coolbot. Why?
Timing of his replacement still doesn't account for that.
-----
breaking because this post is already quite long.