Mushroom Kingdom Mafia (Game over!)

[Alabaska J]

Yeah. That wasn't so bad. Here is my problem. In a game like this lurkin-Alabaska J - Post 247 votes cream, but says "if I hadn't been unavailable I would've voted phoebus"

WOAH nice catch. That should be "voted

before

phoebus.

Mod edit:
Visible votecount:
Cream147 (3): armlx, Phoebus, Alabaska J
TheSweatpantsNinja (3): sideney, Riceballtail, iamausername
Xtoxm (2): DragonsofSummer, alvinz95
Alabaska J (2): populartajo, farside22
farside22 (1): Gimbo
somestrangeflea (1): Dead Rikimaru
armlx (1): killa seven
Gimbo (1): somestrangeflea
MafiaSSK (1): TheSweatpantsNinja

Not voting (9): Xtoxm, Surye, MafiaSSK, Pepsidude, Cream147, FaerieLord, Celebloki, mr. incrediball, Rogue Shenanigans

With 24 alive it takes 13 real votes to lynch.

[Alabaska J]

Also farside could be a partner of Cream. I mean to you guys not on the Cream wagon not really see the case on him?

prod Gimbo

[killa seven]

vote farside

[Lawrencelot]

Xtoxm has requested replacement, he will be replaced soon.
MafiaSSK has been prodded.
alvinz95 did not respond to his prod and will be replaced if he doesn't respond within 48 hours.
Dead Rikimaru responded to his prod in the thread.

[alvinz95]

request replacement

Vote: No Lynch

[alvinz95]

EBWOP:

unvote, vote: no lynch

[Lawrencelot]

skitzer hereby replaces Xtoxm.

[skitzer]

Hooray!

Rereading soon.

[Riceballtail]

To summarize 21 pages for you, Gimbo has a 1-up mushroom and posts erratically, surye doesn't have an item, several people are lurking, actively or not.

In other news, Farside is really starting to click to me. I was fairly sure she was town, but am no longer convinced as such. However, I still support a TSN lynch.

[Lawrencelot]

andersonw replaces MafiaSSK

.

[andersonw]

To summarize 21 pages for you, Gimbo has a 1-up mushroom and posts erratically, surye doesn't have an item, several people are lurking, actively or not.

Thanks for posting this, though I'm going to try a reread anyways.
What does a 1-up mushroom do? Or does Gimbo explain it in the thread somewhere?

[skitzer]

OK, not a superb reread, but enough.

OK, Readthrough (note, I’m only highlighting on important posts I see):

Post 36 (Alabaska J): Alabaska J confirms late. It’s a kindy touchy scum tell. I usually don’t rely on it.

Post 66 (Gimbo): Gimbo sure talks a lot about bandwagons in this game. He also uses the F-word a lot too. Shame!

Post 77 (Gimbo): 1st paragraph makes no sense at all. 2nd paragraph, he says not to analyze all his posts. (?)

Post 80 (Gimbo): Another bad post by Gimbo. Makes me remember Disciple Slayer.

Posts 83-99 (armlx, killa seven, Gimbo, populartajo, maybe more): All discussing who Gimbo is. Then Gimbo and populartajo got into a emoticon war.

Post 100 (Rogue Shenanigans): thank goodness we have your sensibility.

Post 115 (Phoebus): and an ultra dose of sensibility doesn’t hurt, either.

Post 119 (Phoebus): I know why he voted that way. It may have possibly been a bad move on Cream’s part.

Note: Intense readthrough here (at 152) and so far, I agree with the whole TSN case.

Note: Gimbo’s claim seems definitely…off.

Post 217 (populartajo): definitely agreeing with this.

Post 218 (Gimbo): “half the

town’s

posted?” Self explanatory.

Post 234 (Phoebus) I don’t like pressure wagons.

Post 246 (Gimbo): I have a weird idea about the giving away of the mushroom, I’ll post it at the end.

Post 373 (pepsidude) I agree that Gimbo’s role seems to keep getting bigger, but I don’t think he is scum.

Note: agreeing that Rogue Shenanigans reaction was weird. Will probably vote later in readthrough.

Yeah. I'm thinking I don't agree much with TSN's policy, on a hunch, Gimbo is fairly cleared, and Rogue's action of jumping off that bandwagon like a cat in a thunderstorm (ooh, bad metaphor) makes me do this:

Vote: Rogue Shenanigans

[Riceballtail]

The 1-up mushroom is apparently a revival mechanism, day use only. It has another property that is beneficial for scum. We don't know what that is unless you're Gimbo and Surye.

[Alabaska J]

-Alabaska J - Post 247 votes cream, but says "if I hadn't been unavailable I would've voted phoebus" Post: 345 why FOS Mafia when so many others don't seem to be reading the thread. Post 418 setting up lynches in advance. Post 474 when pushed about what case he says that the person needs to read the thread.

247: Typo.
345: The only other person not reading I am voting. Therefore, you point is wrong. Nice try, though.
418: Just pointing out my top two suspects, then saying they would be nice back-to-back lynches. I know that post looks bad, but is it really so wrong to think my top two suspects are scummy?
474: Well seeing as me, armlx, and phoebus (and probably more) have all posted it multiple times…

Alabaska seems really excited about night and is pushing to lynch Cream for some odd reason that he never wants to back up.
Honestly I'm at a toss up at who is the worse on this. I'm going with Alabaska because of his eagerness to see the day done with a quick lynch.

unvote:
vote: Alabaska

I really don't see why everyone is so reluctant about Cream. He has consistently acted scummy

and

we have a 1-up in case some sort of miracle occurs and he misread his pm or something.


Also, when did tajo vote me? Can't find it…

[Alabaska J]

Holy crap, I was his random vote! Lol.

[armlx]

EBWOP:

unvote, vote: no lynch

I don't get it.

[Alabaska J]

EBWOP:

unvote, vote: no lynch

I don't get it.

This isn't epicmafia, alvinz.

[TheSweatpantsNinja]

MafiaSSK replaced out as soon as being prodded? Shocking.

Unvote, vote farside.

[Lawrencelot]

malthusis replaces alvinz95.

[armlx]

MafiaSSK replaced out as soon as being prodded? Shocking.

Unvote, vote farside.

Where is that coming from?

FOS Alabaska

, might become a vote.

[FaerieLord]

It's coming from a previous game armlx. See Mini 584.

[farside22]

TSPN I believe is voting me because I said he FOS'ed everyone and haven't responded well to his I didn't not and am making things up comment.
It wasn't that you FOS'ed everyone TSPN it was this comment below.

Gimbo wins again with the scum refusing to hand over coins. Unless people want to get lynched for being anti-town, when the town decides its time to move coins, they'd better move coins. That said, the day hasn't even been going for more than 24 hours. People will come back and contribute. We shouldn't be anywhere near lynching yet.

Coin Pooling. Putting all the coins in one basket seems like the optimal way for something disasterous to happen, and pooling them with multiple people seems like the optimal way for scum to just get a bunch of coins.

Basically you are saying here anyone who doesn't do the coin exchange is scum. That is like FOS'ing anyone who disagrees wouldn't you say?

But coin pooling can directly lead to optimal coin usage, meaning scum get no coins, unless, of course, town members hold out on us. Or are you referring to scum getting some of those coins? They'll have to give some away as well, unless they think they can chance getting away with lying about having coins at all.

[Gimbo]

so i was gone for a day and the farside wagon has .... dissapeared?

for now

Unvote

in school right now, will post in depth (lol) tonight.

[farside22]

so i was gone for a day and the farside wagon has .... dissapeared?

for now

Unvote

in school right now, will post in depth (lol) tonight.

If you call a wagon 3 votes then no it hasn't disappeared.

[armlx]

It's coming from a previous game armlx. See Mini 584.

The farside vote? Thats what I'm talking about. Not the replacement comment.