My read through of Riceballtail
(7) - confirm post
(42) - random vote
(93) - a joke about BM.
(233) - clarifies that there is probably a Mario and Luigi role, by what the first post said.
(304) - points out that there are no regular power roles and approves of Gimbo’s trade and trade back to Surye.
(365) - agrees with Rogue Shenanigans on the fact that pooling coins is only good for scum, a point I also agree with, and he votes TheSweatpantsNinja.
(372) - says that we need a bigger bandwagon on TheSweatpants Ninja.
(508) - tries to summarize 21 pages for me, thinks that farside could be scum, but still says he supports a lynch of TheSweatpantsNinja.
(512) - explains what Gimbo’s 1-UP mushroom does.
(550) - VLA Post
(603) - says there is no beneficial discussion. Somewhat disagrees with Gimbo’s lurker hunting. Votes Surye for revealing the scum benefit of the 1-UP mushroom. In my opinion, it is better that Surye did, because now we know that we need to be extra careful with it so that it doesn’t fall into scum hands.
(625) - says he’s
okay
with a No Lynch on day 1. It is entirely possible for many good cases to form on Day 1, which could all lead to scum.
(627) - says that we have already decided that we are going to do a mass vig/cop tonight, when nothing of the sort has been decided.
(643) - unvotes and says he is going to process these new thoughts
(689) - agrees with wagon on Phoebus (I don’t find it that good myself) and says his No Lynch vote was just testing reactions…
(692) - says that laziness can help catch scum…scum are more likely to be the ones playing than the ones lurking, IMO.
(701) - says that my vote on him was the exact reaction he was looking for. Did you expect everyone to brush it off and just say “Oh, he just voted No Lynch because he was
testing reactions.
”?
Also, @ Rogue Shenanigans: I believe this situation is entirely different from yours: You jumped off a bandwagon, while I voted for someone who had no votes at all.
FoS: Rogue Shenanigans
just to keep my suspicions up there.