Mini 617 - Scottish Mafia, Game Over

starkmoon · Post Post #200 (ISO) » Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:39 pm

[col color=white]Player[col color=white]Votes[col color=white]Voting [col color=white]Empking[col color=white]4[col color=white]Lowell, Cephrir, roflcopter, kuribo [col color=white]Cybele[col color=white]1[col color=white]dcorbe [col color=white]kuribo[col color=white]2[col color=white]massive, empking [col color=white]dcorbe[col color=white]1[col color=white]q21

[col color=white]Not Voting : [col color=white] CC09, Cybele

10 alive, 6 to lynch

kuribo · Post Post #201 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:27 am

Empking wrote:Kuribo seemed strongly in beleif that EA was scummed yet wouldn't vote for him. That has not been disproven.

All the points aren't find and reasonble. The points were based on the town forgetting that the doc got himself killed. Though I've hinted previously.

I'm the cop and Dcorbe was investigated as innocent.

I've not tried to disprove it, I've flat out said I didn't vote for him, and said why. I'm not going to back down from that decision, nor am I going to change my reasoning.

I don't believe you about the cop claim, but just to be on the safe side,

Unvote

kuribo · Post Post #202 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:14 am

Empking wrote:I didn't vote for him because I thought Dcorbe was more likely. Everyone in town isn't one giant hive mind with the same ideas and the same reads. Rereading the thread during the night I now think Dcorbe is innocent. I didn't at the time.

Cephir, I don't understand your point. Sorry.

Actually, that statement kinda does back up his cop claim / dcorbe innocent. Especially considering I don't see anything he could have "reread" at night that would lead him to believe that dcorbe was innocent.

Empking · Post Post #203 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:31 am

I don't care whether or not you've tried to disprove it. I care about the fact that your side said you had disproved it.

kuribo · Post Post #204 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:42 am

Empking wrote:I don't care whether or not you've tried to disprove it. I care about the fact that your side said you had disproved it.

When did I ever say that I had voted for him? I said that I kept up pressure in questioning him, which I did, evidenced by the curse-laden tirade that he saw fit to direct towards me.

ISO · Post Post #205 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:47 am

Gah.

Unvote

.

Empking · Post Post #206 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:03 am

kuribo wrote:
Empking wrote:I don't care whether or not you've tried to disprove it. I care about the fact that your side said you had disproved it.
When did I ever say that I had voted for him? I said that I kept up pressure in questioning him, which I did, evidenced by the curse-laden tirade that he saw fit to direct towards me.

Don't ask me, it was the "get Empking to claim despite the fact that the Doc decided to get himself killed" side that said it was disproven.

kuribo · Post Post #207 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:05 am

Empking wrote: Don't ask me, it was the "get Empking to claim despite the fact that the Doc decided to get himself killed" side that said it was disproven.

Don't make statements if you don't know why you're making them, your argument is making absolutely no sense.

kuribo · Post Post #208 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:05 am

And the doc didn't "decide" to get killed, I highly doubt if he said to himself, "you know what, how can I get myself killed?"

Empking · Post Post #209 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:17 am

I know why I'm making them. Because your side is lying to try and get me lynched and I don't feel they should be uncontested.

kuribo · Post Post #210 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:21 am

Empking wrote:I know why I'm making them. Because your side is lying to try and get me lynched and I don't feel they should be uncontested.

If you're really a cop, then we're on the same side.

Think about it, I'm not the only person who was voting you, and not all of us can possibly be scum.

Stop taking it so personally.

Empking · Post Post #211 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:25 am

You know I meant the "get Empking to claim despite the fact that the Doc decided to get himself killed" side

I'm not taking it personally at all. But I'm sure not wanting you and your scum buddies to get away with lies is reason enough for you to pretend I'm just taking it to personal.

kuribo · Post Post #212 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:48 am

Empking wrote:You know I meant the "get Empking to claim despite the fact that the Doc decided to get himself killed" side

I'm not taking it personally at all. But I'm sure not wanting you and your scum buddies to get away with lies is reason enough for you to pretend I'm just taking it to personal.

I don't have any scum buddies. The only "evidence" you have against me is that I went after you (pure OMGUS) and that I didn't vote against EA (despite basically forcing him into the lynch)

And again, the doc did not DECIDE to get himself killed.

Empking · Post Post #213 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:55 am

Which is better than your "He has his own views" and your "he didn't lynch the scum before we had a chance to see bonds."

kuribo · Post Post #214 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:00 am

Empking wrote:Which is better than your "He has his own views" and your "he didn't lynch the scum before we had a chance to see bonds."

Is English your first language?

kuribo · Post Post #215 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:01 am

Also, when did I ever attack someone for not quicklynching the scum?

Empking · Post Post #216 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:09 am

Yes it is.. I just really loose my grasp of the language when typing.

You didn't, but personally I don't feel that on day 1 when he's constantly attacked as soon as we leave the random voting stage isn't enough time.

kuribo · Post Post #217 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:11 am

Empking wrote:Yes it is.. I just really loose my grasp of the language when typing.

You didn't, but personally I don't feel that on day 1 when he's constantly attacked as soon as we leave the random voting stage isn't enough time.

Of course it's not enough time, there's alot that can go down after the random voting stage, people should never be quicklynched immediately following the random vote.

Empking · Post Post #218 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:15 am

I meant is enough time.

kuribo · Post Post #219 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:25 am

Empking wrote:I meant is enough time.

So you're saying that you disagree that he should have been quicklynched?

q21 · Post Post #220 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:55 am

Empking, you claim points at the guy I'm voting for being innocent so for now I'll

unvote

but your last few posts (all of your posts on this page) make very little sense.

ISO · Post Post #221 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:17 am

Empking wrote:"get Empking to claim despite the fact that the Doc decided to get himself killed"

you

do

realize that not even the scum would have known what you would claim , right? (Hypothetically assuming he's telling the truth)

q21 wrote:but your last few posts (all of your posts on this page) make very little sense.

This.

Empking · Post Post #222 (ISO) » Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:37 pm

Cephrir wrote:
Empking wrote:"get Empking to claim despite the fact that the Doc decided to get himself killed"
you
do
realize that not even the scum would have known what you would claim , right? (Hypothetically assuming he's telling the truth)

q21 wrote:but your last few posts (all of your posts on this page) make very little sense.
This.

Why would the scum know what I'd claim?

kuribo · Post Post #223 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:16 am

Empking wrote: Why would the scum know what I'd claim?

They wouldn't--- that's why your "get Empking to claim" comments make no sense--- they'd have no way of knowing who the doc was last night (not that he decided to get himself killed) nor what your role is. And for that matter, the town had no way of knowing either.

Again, everyone on your bandwagon couldn't have possibly been scum.

Empking · Post Post #224 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:22 am

When did I say everyone who wanted me to claim was scum?

q21 wrote:That's L-1 I believe. Claim or die time.

CoheedCambria09 wrote:I like the Empking wagon, all the points made against him seem valid and resonable... I'll wait for his claim before I do anything though.

Do you deny these quotes?