Mushroom Kingdom Mafia (Game over!)

killa seven · Post Post #950 (ISO) » Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:20 pm

posting to say im here, will re read a bit

Mod edit:
Visible votecount:

Not voting (22): iamausername, skitzer, Phoebus, sideney, somestrangeflea, armlx, Surye, killa seven, Gremwell, mr. incrediball, TheSweatpantsNinja, Alabaska J, farside22, andersonw, malthusis, FaerieLord, Gimbo, Cream147, Korts, Riceballtail, ashmite84, goborage

With 22 alive it takes 12 real votes to lynch.

Gimbo · Post Post #951 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:37 am

YES! I'm alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

killa seven · Post Post #952 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:40 am

^ rofl

Korts · Post Post #953 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:08 am

Hey, guys. I'm nearly up-to-date, five pages or so to go. So far my suspicion list goes: 1. farside 2. RBT. I will make the effort and post a case later today.

armlx · Post Post #954 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:23 am

Results?

populartajo · Post Post #955 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:52 am

Bahgotown.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #956 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:21 am

I think our first port of call should be to answer this question:

Should Gimbo revive populartajo?
Y/N

I'm abstaining for the moment. The reason is the property which makes the item useful for scum. More specifically the "one interesting property of the revived player"¹. To be perfectly honest, reading back over this, I'm not entirely sure why we didn't push for that piece of information. From what I can see, Gimbo and Surye agreed that it should be kept a secret and then we all moved on...

Still, thoughts, everyone?

¹ Surye, post 337.

Korts · Post Post #957 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:25 am

somestrangeflea wrote:I think our first port of call should be to answer this question:

Should Gimbo revive populartajo?
Y/N

Obv. Y.

About the withheld information, don't be so greedy scum. It may be in the town's best interests not to announce that info publicly.

Gimbo · Post Post #958 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:36 am

somestrangeflea: why are you ability-fishing?

I have a theory (based on the knowledge of the item) why I am kept alive (if I was not targetted because the scums think that I migh get protected, then nvm)

however, if Surye is scum and he decided not to lynch me becuz of my shroom, then i see why i'm alive and i don't really like it.....

SSF: how about reviving Rogue? just asking...

Surye · Post Post #959 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:45 am

Gimbo wrote:however, if Surye is scum and he decided not to lynch me becuz of my shroom, then i see why i'm alive and i don't really like it....

I decided not to lynch you? I didn't realize I was the whole town. Of all people you should know that if I'm scum, then I would know you were town, and I would know that you'd likely just use it on whoever got NK'd. Your logic is quite flawed.

Anyways, NK analysis is pretty standard here, it was probably assumed that Gimbo would be protected if he could be, and targeting him would risk a lack of a NK. And thanks the the 1-shot nature of most items revealed so far, they could go back to Gimbo tonight.

As for reviving popu, Y.

Gimbo · Post Post #960 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:47 am

sry i meant NK me

iamausername · Post Post #961 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:49 am

somestrangeflea wrote:Should Gimbo revive populartajo?
Y/N

I was momentarily thinking 'maybe we should save it to use on a better town role', but then I remembered the part where we don't want to think in terms of 'power roles' in this game. So yes, yes he should.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #962 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:53 am

Korts wrote:It may be in the town's best interests not to announce that info publicly.

The point I'm making is that I find it difficult to imagine a property which makes the above statement true whilst being useful for scum. As you haven't seen the item yet, feel free to prove me wrong with some example properties.

Gimbo wrote:somestrangeflea: why are you ability-fishing?

Because I expect a strong Y-vote, and I'd like everything to be out in the open

before

you use the item so we know where we stand.

Gimbo wrote:SSF: how about reviving Rogue? just asking...

I see no reason why we should revive a non-town player.

Gimbo · Post Post #963 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:03 am

SSF: not planning on revealing, and everyone else too, stop trying.

Ok, gonna wait for few more ppl to chip in be4 officially giving pop life

somestrangeflea · Post Post #964 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:16 am

Surye wrote:if I'm scum, then I would know you were town, and I would know that you'd likely just use it on whoever got NK'd.

Bowser's Army and DK Crew say otherwise...

Also Gimbo:

somestrangeflea wrote:
Gimbo wrote:SSF: how about reviving Rogue? just asking...
I see no reason why we should revive a non-town player.

Why do you think we should revive Rogue?

TheSweatpantsNinja · Post Post #965 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:27 am

We should revive populartajo.

Gimbo · Post Post #966 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:41 am

pop it is then?

somestrangeflea · Post Post #967 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:48 am

Slow down.

Thread's only been open for 7 hours...

FaerieLord · Post Post #968 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:12 am

Gimbo, answer SSF

Gimbo · Post Post #969 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:40 am

somestrangeflea wrote:
Surye wrote:if I'm scum, then I would know you were town, and I would know that you'd likely just use it on whoever got NK'd.
Bowser's Army and DK Crew say otherwise...

Also Gimbo:
somestrangeflea wrote:
Gimbo wrote:SSF: how about reviving Rogue? just asking...
I see no reason why we should revive a non-town player.
Why do you think we should revive Rogue?

Sry, i can't answer that, all i can say is that reviving Rogue should be made a viable option

Surye · Post Post #970 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:41 am

Gimbo wrote:
somestrangeflea wrote:
Surye wrote:if I'm scum, then I would know you were town, and I would know that you'd likely just use it on whoever got NK'd.
Bowser's Army and DK Crew say otherwise...

Also Gimbo:
somestrangeflea wrote:
Gimbo wrote:SSF: how about reviving Rogue? just asking...
I see no reason why we should revive a non-town player.
Why do you think we should revive Rogue?
Sry, i can't answer that, all i can say is that reviving Rogue should be made a viable option

Is your claim growing again? :O

Gimbo · Post Post #971 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:46 am

Surye, NO, if you think about the shroom's other ability for a sec, you'll see that its actually not gonna be a bad idea..considering that pop is a confirmed toad now and scum's gonna want him (pop) gone...

FaerieLord · Post Post #972 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:54 am

You know, I'm really feeling uncomfortable right now.

At this point, "just trust me" won't fit

Gimbo · Post Post #973 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:56 am

sigh, forget i ever mentioned Rogue.

Surye · Post Post #974 (ISO) » Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:00 am

Gimbo wrote:sigh, forget i ever mentioned Rogue.

Did you mean pop then?