Mainstream Mafia II: D&D Edition [FIN]

Amrun · Post Post #7825 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:51 am

Step D.

Ignore entirely and vote competing wagon to self espoused optimal play

P-edit: It’s a meme, iconeum. My point is it’s the most nonsensical, cognitive dissonance-filled play you could make, and you have offered ZERO explanation for it.

Iconeum · Post Post #7826 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:53 am

In post 7822, Titus wrote:
In post 7817, Amrun wrote:
In post 7816, Iconeum wrote:
In post 7814, Nero Cain wrote:I'm v confused. You were voting Virgo, Titus subs in on her main and then you didn't want to lynch Titus?
yeah this
Because he'll look hella bad when I flip green. When I was Virgo, I was a VLA lurker ok to lynch. When I'm Titus people know my end game utility and can't be on me for no reason.

Oh and UT, assuming you're manipulated, manipulating you onto Vork is a win win for scum. Also, the manipulator might not be scum (it's not me just saying). I once had a role where I shut the lights off and made everyone vote anonymously as town.

WHY?!

i don't know what u'll flip

i was fine voting you for reasons as stated by yourself here

i'm fine lynching vorkuta for his dubious play around his PR and the requested tracker on him alone

Iconeum · Post Post #7827 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:53 am

In post 7825, Amrun wrote:Step D.

Ignore entirely and vote competing wagon to self espoused optimal play

P-edit: It’s a meme, iconeum. My point is it’s the most nonsensical, cognitive dissonance-filled play you could make, and you have offered ZERO explanation for it.

i bet you would feel pretty bad in my TeamMafia Team

Amrun · Post Post #7828 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:54 am

Iconeum. Why are you, by your own admission, playing suboptimally?

Iconeum · Post Post #7829 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:55 am

In post 7825, Amrun wrote:Step D.

Ignore entirely and vote competing wagon to self espoused optimal play

P-edit: It’s a meme, iconeum. My point is it’s the most nonsensical, cognitive dissonance-filled play you could make, and you have offered ZERO explanation for it.

Seriously though. I'm fixated on your slot. I either wanna lynch you, or try to confirm you through your action (list). That's obviously an unpopular opinion, and there's no need for me to drive through on it right now.

But there's also no harm done in letting everyone know how I feel about it.

Vorkuta is not my lynch of choice, but I don't feel bad lynching him.

And there's 37 players left, we can use some flips

Amrun · Post Post #7830 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:56 am

Did Titus’ replace in change your opinion of the slot? If so, how?

P-edit: why wouldn’t you want to flip the person on my list with a viable wagon right now, then? That’s my whole point.

Iconeum · Post Post #7831 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:56 am

In post 7828, Amrun wrote:Iconeum. Why are you, by your own admission, playing suboptimally?

I think you see it as SubOptimal. I obviously don't. My thoughts on the matter are pretty clear.

Iconeum · Post Post #7832 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:59 am

In post 7830, Amrun wrote:Did Titus’ replace in change your opinion of the slot? If so, how?

P-edit: why wouldn’t you want to flip the person on my list with a viable wagon right now, then? That’s my whole point.

Yes. It started playing.

Amrun · Post Post #7833 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:00 am

In post 7831, Iconeum wrote:
In post 7828, Amrun wrote:Iconeum. Why are you, by your own admission, playing suboptimally?
I think you see it as SubOptimal. I obviously don't. My thoughts on the matter are pretty clear.

No, you stated your idea of optimal play, which was either a) lynch me, or b) lynch off my list.

B) is viable right now, and a slot you ostensibly scumread, do not pursuing B is suboptimal play according to YOU.

Iconeum · Post Post #7834 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:03 am

I don't think it's the right call to lynch off the list, TODAY.

However once that list shortens due to NK's, we'll be able to do so usefully.

Titus · Post Post #7835 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:05 am

I'm trying to sleep again. I think Ico might be whiteknighting but I need tmo to look into that.

I could just be in a place where everyone is scum.

Amrun · Post Post #7836 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:05 am

In post 7834, Iconeum wrote:I don't think it's the right call to lynch off the list, TODAY.

However once that list shortens due to NK's, we'll be able to do so usefully.

When did your opinion on this change?

Iconeum · Post Post #7837 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:07 am

In post 7836, Amrun wrote:
In post 7834, Iconeum wrote:I don't think it's the right call to lynch off the list, TODAY.

However once that list shortens due to NK's, we'll be able to do so usefully.
When did your opinion on this change?

around the time i made that post

Iconeum · Post Post #7838 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:07 am

Miss Lane · Post Post #7839 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:09 am

In post 7835, Titus wrote:I'm trying to sleep again. I think Ico might be whiteknighting but I need tmo to look into that.

I could just be in a place where everyone is scum.

This post has scum equity for Icon (as if he isn't already trying to buy it out of stock) if Titus flips scum.

Iconeum · Post Post #7840 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:10 am

spicey

Amrun · Post Post #7841 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:11 am

In post 7837, Iconeum wrote:
In post 7836, Amrun wrote:
In post 7834, Iconeum wrote:I don't think it's the right call to lynch off the list, TODAY.

However once that list shortens due to NK's, we'll be able to do so usefully.
When did your opinion on this change?
around the time i made that post

Which post?

You hurt my soul, Iconeum.

Iconeum · Post Post #7842 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:12 am

In post 7841, Amrun wrote:
In post 7837, Iconeum wrote:
In post 7836, Amrun wrote:
In post 7834, Iconeum wrote:I don't think it's the right call to lynch off the list, TODAY.

However once that list shortens due to NK's, we'll be able to do so usefully.
When did your opinion on this change?
around the time i made that post
Which post?

You hurt my soul, Iconeum.

Like just before 7834

I'm sorry

Iconeum · Post Post #7843 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:13 am

Amrun have we played together before?

Iconeum · Post Post #7844 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:15 am

wasn't vorkuta the one actively trying to get the governor as well?

Amrun · Post Post #7845 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:23 am

In post 7844, Iconeum wrote:wasn't vorkuta the one actively trying to get the governor as well?

One of them, yes.

In post 7843, Iconeum wrote:Amrun have we played together before?

Don’t think so, if your join date is accurate. Before this game I hadn’t played in about 6 years.

I don’t think your play makes sense if you just now decided to change your optimal strategy since you were playing against it for quite some time previous to that.

Iconeum · Post Post #7846 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:25 am

doesn't it make sense from town!Icon, scum!Icon or both?

Iconeum · Post Post #7847 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:27 am

In post 7846, Iconeum wrote:doesn't it make sense from town!Icon, scum!Icon or both?

btw i'm just trying to help you sort me that's all

Amrun · Post Post #7848 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:37 am

In post 7846, Iconeum wrote:doesn't it make sense from town!Icon, scum!Icon or both?

It honestly doesn’t make sense to me from a human being, but it makes relatively more sense from scum Icon because scum don’t have to stay internally consistent because they’re not scum hunting.

Iconeum · Post Post #7849 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:39 am

In post 7848, Amrun wrote:
In post 7846, Iconeum wrote:doesn't it make sense from town!Icon, scum!Icon or both?
It honestly doesn’t make sense to me from a human being, but it makes relatively more sense from scum Icon because scum don’t have to stay internally consistent because they’re not scum hunting.

Huh. Do you realize town are a lot more free to spew thoughts then scum, and that scum are a LOT more worried about telling a consistent story then town?