Mainstream Mafia II: D&D Edition [FIN]

Miss Lane · Post Post #10050 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:20 pm

eh the cobble mistake was my own fault

never seen a mod put game necessary content in the flavor text before

Iconeum · Post Post #10051 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:21 pm

In post 10049, Miss Lane wrote:I hate that I felt like I played pretty darn well this game

but i was mechanically fucked upside down and backwards

can we start talking you out of a scum!Icon read already?

pisskop · Post Post #10052 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:21 pm

i think you did fine. Sometimes the best roles are those that are negative, because they force you to play differently.

Amrun · Post Post #10053 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:23 pm

In post 10052, pisskop wrote:i think you did fine. Sometimes the best roles are those that are negative, because they force you to play differently.

You believe ML now? What is going on?!

pisskop · Post Post #10054 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:23 pm

In post 10039, Cephrir wrote:FB was the scum kill... why?

my gut would say that scumteam is panicking? fire was all but confed and theyre dropping like flies now.

Iconeum · Post Post #10055 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:24 pm

In post 10053, Amrun wrote:
In post 10052, pisskop wrote:i think you did fine. Sometimes the best roles are those that are negative, because they force you to play differently.
You believe ML now? What is going on?!

If you don't believe ML, why are you pushing me together?

Why aren't you pushing a GUILTY on a serial killer?

pisskop · Post Post #10056 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:24 pm

In post 10053, Amrun wrote:
In post 10052, pisskop wrote:i think you did fine. Sometimes the best roles are those that are negative, because they force you to play differently.
You believe ML now? What is going on?!

i think the reaction is genuine, and the flavor seems to be fairly in line.

something something evil goblin who worships the blood god.

gobbledygook · Post Post #10057 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:24 pm

In post 10045, Bingle wrote:
In post 10026, pisskop wrote:Im kind of for leashing an sk, if only to not waste a lynch on what ml is claiming. and the extra town-driven kill is nice
^

Also, lynching elements means we have to then lynch ml, which is two cult recruits without a lynch between them.

EP claimed to be confirmable, btw, resolve that today.

EP confirmed to me last night

Iconeum · Post Post #10058 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:25 pm

In post 10057, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 10045, Bingle wrote:
In post 10026, pisskop wrote:Im kind of for leashing an sk, if only to not waste a lynch on what ml is claiming. and the extra town-driven kill is nice
^

Also, lynching elements means we have to then lynch ml, which is two cult recruits without a lynch between them.

EP claimed to be confirmable, btw, resolve that today.
EP confirmed to me last night

I NEED THIS INFORMATION IT'S IMPORTANT

Amrun · Post Post #10059 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:25 pm

I do believe ML. Pisskop didn’t.

And we are pushing you, Iconeum, because of the absolute bullshit you pulled day 2 with your cognitive dissonance.

Miss Lane · Post Post #10060 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:25 pm

In post 10051, Iconeum wrote:
In post 10049, Miss Lane wrote:I hate that I felt like I played pretty darn well this game

but i was mechanically fucked upside down and backwards
can we start talking you out of a scum!Icon read already?

if you weren't scum, i would be open to it

Amrun · Post Post #10061 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:25 pm

In post 10057, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 10045, Bingle wrote:
In post 10026, pisskop wrote:Im kind of for leashing an sk, if only to not waste a lynch on what ml is claiming. and the extra town-driven kill is nice
^

Also, lynching elements means we have to then lynch ml, which is two cult recruits without a lynch between them.

EP claimed to be confirmable, btw, resolve that today.
EP confirmed to me last night

In what way

gobbledygook · Post Post #10062 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:25 pm

In post 10055, Iconeum wrote:
In post 10053, Amrun wrote:
In post 10052, pisskop wrote:i think you did fine. Sometimes the best roles are those that are negative, because they force you to play differently.
You believe ML now? What is going on?!
If you don't believe ML, why are you pushing me together?

Why aren't you pushing a GUILTY on a serial killer?

Quite literally because we have bigger fish to fry

pisskop · Post Post #10063 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:26 pm

In post 10055, Iconeum wrote:Why aren't you pushing a GUILTY on a serial killer?

why are you so intent on this? the sk isnt our biggest problem rn, and were actively talking about right now.

Iconeum · Post Post #10064 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:26 pm

EP, did you confirm your allignment to someone N3?

Iconeum · Post Post #10065 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:26 pm

Because then we have to talk

Amrun · Post Post #10066 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:26 pm

In post 10063, pisskop wrote:
In post 10055, Iconeum wrote:Why aren't you pushing a GUILTY on a serial killer?
why are you so intent on this? the sk isnt our biggest problem rn, and were actively talking about right now.

Because scum

Zoraster was also fixated on this

Miss Lane · Post Post #10067 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:27 pm

icon trying to push SK instead of scum is super sus, btw

and just adds to the fact that he should have been lynched a lot earlier

gobbledygook · Post Post #10068 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:27 pm

In post 10061, Amrun wrote:
In post 10057, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 10045, Bingle wrote:
In post 10026, pisskop wrote:Im kind of for leashing an sk, if only to not waste a lynch on what ml is claiming. and the extra town-driven kill is nice
^

Also, lynching elements means we have to then lynch ml, which is two cult recruits without a lynch between them.

EP claimed to be confirmable, btw, resolve that today.
EP confirmed to me last night
In what way

He is mod confirmed town to me unless he was also recruited the same night

pisskop · Post Post #10069 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:27 pm

In post 10062, gobbledygook wrote: Quite literally because we have bigger fish to fry

it looks pretty desperate imo.

who's the bigger literal fish gobbles?

P: ZOR WAS SCUM. Scum directly benefits from an SK lynch. not a good look

Iconeum · Post Post #10070 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:27 pm

I redirected EP into Zor N3

Amrun · Post Post #10071 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:28 pm

In post 10069, pisskop wrote:
In post 10062, gobbledygook wrote: Quite literally because we have bigger fish to fry
it looks pretty desperate imo.

who's the bigger literal fish gobbles?

P: ZOR WAS SCUM. Scum directly benefits from an SK lynch. not a good look

Yeah that’s the point. It’s a scummy thing to do. Ergo, Iconeum is scummy and needs rope.

pisskop · Post Post #10072 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:28 pm

In post 10070, Iconeum wrote:I redirected EP into Zor N3

gobbledygook · Post Post #10073 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:29 pm

In post 10070, Iconeum wrote:I redirected EP into Zor N3

It is day 5. You have one night action?

Amrun · Post Post #10074 (ISO) » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:29 pm

In post 10068, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 10061, Amrun wrote:
In post 10057, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 10045, Bingle wrote:
In post 10026, pisskop wrote:Im kind of for leashing an sk, if only to not waste a lynch on what ml is claiming. and the extra town-driven kill is nice
^

Also, lynching elements means we have to then lynch ml, which is two cult recruits without a lynch between them.

EP claimed to be confirmable, btw, resolve that today.
EP confirmed to me last night
In what way
He is mod confirmed town to me unless he was also recruited the same night

So we have 2 friendly neighbors? :/