Why do you need Kristopf to post so you can give your second reason? Are you saying if he does not post and ultimately gets replaced, we will never hear your reasoning. You have a habit of saying I will explain my reason if someone guesses it correctly, or if something else happens. Why are your explanations always contingent on something?
Malex McJokeus wrote:Why do you need Kristopf to post so you can give your second reason? Are you saying if he does not post and ultimately gets replaced, we will never hear your reasoning. You have a habit of saying I will explain my reason if someone guesses it correctly, or if something else happens. Why are your explanations always contingent on something?
I want a reaction from him so that when I post my reason, he won't be able to switch his reaction based on it. (I can guarantee you that he *won't* guess it.) I don't care if he gets replaced. I want a reaction to me still being alive/voting Batto off the bat, even if it comes from a replacement. (Would be easier with him though.) My explanations are contingent on stuff because if I explain everything, your reactions change. I'm trying to get a raw reaction whenever I can. I always explain myself eventually, but I prefer to get as much out of it while I can. Right now, y'all know I'm reaction fishing, but you don't know why. This gives me the upper hand until I throw the rest of my cards on the table, which I will do.
Mirth wrote:
I want a reaction from him so that when I post my reason, he won't be able to switch his reaction based on it. (I can guarantee you that he *won't* guess it.) I don't care if he gets replaced. I want a reaction to me still being alive/voting Batto off the bat, even if it comes from a replacement.
It seems to me like you are just setting a trap. I have a feeling that this will change Kristopf's response from what it would usually be.
Mirth wrote:
This gives me the upper hand until I throw the rest of my cards on the table, which I will do.
The question is, do we want you with the upper hand?
Mirth wrote:
I want a reaction from him so that when I post my reason, he won't be able to switch his reaction based on it. (I can guarantee you that he *won't* guess it.) I don't care if he gets replaced. I want a reaction to me still being alive/voting Batto off the bat, even if it comes from a replacement.
It seems to me like you are just setting a trap. I have a feeling that this will change Kristopf's response from what it would usually be.
Mirth wrote:
This gives me the upper hand until I throw the rest of my cards on the table, which I will do.
The question is, do we want you with the upper hand?
Even if his response changes, it would change in a manner that will be able to predict what I'm going to say. As to whether you want me with an upper hand, well, you'll see.
While we are waiting on Kristoph, how bout we go to the discussion of the dead players to keep the game alive shall we?
Battousai wrote:Ok, after reading Farside's posts, I do not think the scum killed her because she was a cop. So that leaves semi random, defensive killing, and setup.
If it's defensive killing I would suspect either Grem, Zeal, or Malex for Farside mentions them as being scummy or mentions bad things about them (Malex and his posts). Now we through in the fact that Mirth is still alive. Mirth had similar suspicions on Malex. So if Malex was scum, why didn't he go for the person who basically leads the thread? So either Malex and Mirth are scum pairs or it's Grem or Zeal (if it's a defensive killing)
If it's a setup, then I would expect Grem to be protown as farside was more suspicious of him than the other 2. Unfortunately this way there isn't much to go on, on who IS scum.
If it's semi-random, it means the person randomly picked the target among the 5 protown players, and probably minus 1 or 2 people who would suspect them. So if this was the case, then I would expect Mirth, Merc, or Kristoph to be scum.
What does everybody think about this interpretation? Which one do you feel is more likely, due to yesterdays posts?
I agree that there was not a single clue that farside was cop, and I don't think she would be the prime target for a defensive kill, as there were several more active scum hunters working in the same direction as her. My vote would go for semi random or a setup because it would make for several targets (as mentioned above) to throw off the trail), and we're getting close to LyoL
Mod: Has Kristoph picked up the prod or are you looking for a replacement?
I
think
that Mirth is refering to why Farside was killed over me and her. If I was newb scum I would have killed Mirth first, unless she was my partner, and then probably Farside, as a Battousai lynch would probably be easier than a Farside at that point.
Mod: Has Kristoph picked up the prod or are you looking for a replacement?
I
think
that Mirth is refering to why Farside was killed over me and her. If I was newb scum I would have killed Mirth first, unless she was my partner, and then probably Farside, as a Battousai lynch would probably be easier than a Farside at that point.
Why would you have killed me first if you were scum?
I rather not say, as it may or may not be benficial to scum to get my opinion on this matter. Plus it could be used against me later in a fabricated case against me by scum later as directing the scum or something like that.
Battousai wrote:
I think that Mirth is refering to why Farside was killed over me and her. If I was newb scum I would have killed Mirth first, unless she was my partner
Perhaps they were wary of the possibility of a doctor?
Battousai wrote:
I think that Mirth is refering to why Farside was killed over me and her. If I was newb scum I would have killed Mirth first, unless she was my partner
Perhaps they were wary of the possibility of a doctor?
I can tell you they were quite weary of the possibility of a doctor. Smart scum always are.
Battosai wrote:As I could not find any tells, the only way they would have known there to be a doctor or a cop is if there are two goons and no roleblocker.
This is not taking into account the 50% chance of both if they had a roleblocker. I think you should know better to ignore that.
