OK, continuing where I left off.
Hadh 208: The part of this post where you are arguing about your cop claim is scummy. If you are town, there is no need for sentences like "for all you know I could be scum who has just made that hypothesis to make it seem like I am town." Everyone else will decide whether they suspect you or not. A townie doesn't have any reason to say why he could be suspected himself.
Netlava 212: When exactly did you see Mac doing this? It doesn't look to me like he ever did agree with you that LG's post was a veiled attack.
Camn 216: While I don't agree with a "lets all focus on one person" plan, I think Camn really thought this as a good idea in her mind. I disagree with the plan, but don't find proposing the plan scummy.
I originally mentioned Netlava's vote (against me) seeming OMGUS to me, and a few different people have had mixed opinions on whether it was or not. To be clear, I don't think his cases themselves are what's OMGUS. He's been making them from the start regardless of what I do. But what I pointed out was they were all only questions and comments to me the entire game, but then
after
I mention suspicion of Netlava,
then
he decides to switch his vote to me. Maybe OMGUS isn't the right term to describe this, but it feels like Netlava was giving me excess pressure hoping someone else would run with it or I would make a bad play, then there could be a case against me while he still had his vote on Charter. While I was defending myself or questioning other people, all I got was pressure. When I question Netlava, that's when I got the vote.
Netlava 229: At one point, right in the middle of all your multiple attacks against me, you said "I've actually been leaning town on Riot until now." Where does that fall into you pursuing me so aggressively for thinking I'm scum?
Netlava 232: Major BS. Are you actually saying "What if I'm lying?" as a defense??
Charter 235: Huh? Why was the order people voted Hadhfang interesting but not information giving? That excuse seems bogus.
Tinsley 242: I haven't felt like you were lurking this whole game but now that I think about it you don't really have many opinions in on what's going on in the game atm. Anxious to know your updated thoughts.
Netlava 244: No, that's not inconsistent at all. You have him on your number 2 spot of your LoS (at this point in the game), Mac assumes you think he's scum. What about that could be inconsistent?
How is not defending yourself foiling LG's plans? (Which I don't believe exist.)
The way you single me out is scummy because for the whole first half of the game you do it while keeping your vote on Charter and making comments like, "I've been leaning town on him," but once I challenge you for suspecting me now you're sure enough of me to vote me. You also not only question my actions, you question ME about OTHER people's actions, instead of asking them about it.
That's just it, I don't think you have any grounds to suspect LG on. I'm not seeing his post as a veiled attack in any way. If anything, saying your pursuit of me is a vendetta gives the idea that you're not scum trying to get me lynched, you're just a townie with bad blood. I also don't believe he was demanding you respond, I think he was saying, "This is a good point, but I won't let it dictate my vote until Netlava has a fair chance to explain." I know you've given reasons for voting Mac, but (sorry for being harsh) they're all dumb reasons. You also pull them out after he suspects you, thus OMGUS.
My disappearance from the LoS confuses me as much as Walnut being added. Everyone's already asked for explanation so I guess I'll just wait.
Walnut 248: If you think Netlava is being mislynched, speak out against it. If you think he is being justly lynched, don't give disclaimers for being a part of it. This post feels like distancing without actually being a part of the case.
==========
Finally, caught up. Netlava's actions before my breakdown of his play were questionable, but now that he's under some pressure he's started throwing mud in every direction. Most of his accusations are either unexplained or beyond stretching. I'm not sure how to interpret me leaving his list. I didn't feel I should be on there in the first place, but that doesn't justify me going from #1 to gone. My only guess is that he felt his case against me wouldn't hold, so he had to try and throw suspicion elsewhere to avoid too much building on himself.
Walnut is continuing to set off my scumdar, but always with small enough blips to question myself. Still, he's nowhere near as scummy as Netlava.
**Mod:
ShadowGirl has asked for a replacement in another game I'm in. I don't know if she was just wanting out of that specific game, or if she's too busy for MS in general. Can we
Prod ShadowGirl
please?