Newbie 594: (Game Over!)

[Atticus]

Then you are wrong.

[silence]

Then you are wrong.

What I said is trivially true. What information you think magically appears if gnwf is observed to be town?

[silence]

Ok, the night kill would be new but I don't believe much conclusions can be drawn from that.

[Nocmen]

We can always garner information regarding the possible alignments of people as how they respond to a wagon and such.

Therefore, I propose trying

Vote: Game and Watch Forever

[zu_Faul]

Vote: Game and watch forever

[nonny]

Vote Count:
Game and Watch Forever (3): Atticus, Nocmen, zu_faul

Not voting (2): Game and Watch Forever, silence

With 5 alive it is 3 to lynch.

That is a lynch. You string up Game and Watch Forever, and find he is just a simple townie.

It is now night, please get choices in to me.

(also I don't have the power to lock the thread, so just don't post till I announce day or I'll ask Mr Flay to lock it)

Locked -Flay

[bird1111]

If you do not have mod powers when you are ready to start day, PM me and I will unlock the thread for you. Thanks for looking after the game while I am away

[bird1111]

Nocmen died. He was a townie. 3 of you left leaves 2 to lynch.

[Atticus]

Well then, if no one's talking, I'll start us off.
If I were to pick someone to lynch just based on my gut today, I would say silence. He was adamantly against lynching GNWF, which to me said that he knew he was town. He continually tried to stop it, claiming that there was no information to be gained.

I mean, I realise that he's town, and that I was wrong. let's kill scum this time, though. I'm gonna go start looking for connections to BW.

[silence]

Lost internet access, back on Sunday.

[Atticus]

Well, the only thing I see as a connection from blackwolf to silence (haven't checked the other way) is that near the end of day1, BW is asked to vote the person he finds scummiest. He almost randomly selects silence, someone he barely mentions in earlier posts.

[zu_Faul]

Well, if I look at the list I made yesterday the choice seems easy. I'll think about it though.

[silence]

Ok. Returned from vacation and thus have Internet access now.

zu_Faul, why did you hammer yesterday?

[zu_Faul]

It was hammertime.

We had a majority wanting him lynched rather than replaced.

[zu_Faul]

Just want you to know that I'll be on vacation starting the 9th of August. We should be long finisshed till then.

[Atticus]

Silence, why

didn't

you hammer yesterday?

[silence]

If I were to pick someone to lynch just based on my gut today, I would say silence. He was adamantly against lynching GNWF, which to me said that he knew he was town. He continually tried to stop it, claiming that there was no information to be gained.

Whaat.
- Let's lynch player X
- Player Y opposed lynching X, he must be scum.

If it worked this way, you could have forced any lynch you want as anyone opposing is scummy based on aforementioned lynch.

Silence, why

didn't

you hammer yesterday?

Why would I? I did not consider him to be most likely to be scum, I would rather have continued the day and tried to lynch either my previous top suspect zu_Faul or Atticus for pushing the GnWF lynch.

We had a majority wanting him lynched rather than replaced.

But why did you want to lynch him rather than, e.g., try to get a majority to support lynching Atticus?

[Atticus]

The fact that you called out two innocents and have labeled the remaining two as scum before we were the remaining two seems pretty convincing. And pretty convenient.

[zu_Faul]

We had a majority wanting him lynched rather than replaced.

But why did you want to lynch him rather than, e.g., try to get a majority to support lynching Atticus?

I could not get a read on him because he didn't post that much, therefore he was very possbile scum.

[bird1111]

Lack of activity is displeasing. Do I need to deadline you all?

[Atticus]

sha-dizzle, is a post every 48 hours no longer enough? we can crank it up to around every 36 if you like.

But zu has been pretty townie all day, as I see it. So I'll see what I can get for you, silence, later. And silence has been looking pretty scummy, so zu, I'll go look for something later.

[silence]

The fact that you called out two innocents and have labeled the remaining two as scum before we were the remaining two seems pretty convincing. And pretty convenient.

Not quite sure what you are implying here. Are yuo aware that I labeled you and zu_Faul the most likely to be scum already day 3?

I could not get a read on him because he didn't post that much, therefore he was very possbile scum.

More possible than Atticus? When and why did you change your opinion about this?

[zu_Faul]

You said nocmen was more scummy than either of us.

I don't know exactly when I changed my mind. I was also a bit annoyed that he disappeared. I have rather scum win than lurker scum win, and I may take this into account into close decisions.

[silence]

You said nocmen was more scummy than either of us.

Argh. This is correct. Somehow I misremembered my own suspicions.

However, the point of my explanation of not wanting to hammer gnwf still stands - he was last on my list so I would have wanted to lynch anyone else rather than him.

[Atticus]

Fair enough.